Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoJoey
They didn't give you further reasoning on why they suspected someone else was using your account??
Industry standard is to not give out evidential information to the player.
More detailed information will be provided to legal representatives if that route is taken.
In my experience as an integrity agent 99% of people who post like this on 2+2 are not accurate about their circumstances or behaviour.
IF OP legitimately played the tournament:
then he should engage a lawyer and make a complaint to the relevant dispute resolution authority, at this point Party will be obligated to justify their decision with internal information that would not be released to the player.
A confiscation of this size will have to have been signed off at a high level in any company run by competent adults, for this to have been signed off they clearly thought that they had the requisite proof to withstand a legal complaint. Understand that Party really don't benefit nor are they incentivised to take such actions, they don't keep the funds, and have to inform players a fraudulent player was active on their site and they only caught them after they had binked big.
Quote:
Originally Posted by deuceblocker
When they disqualify the 1st place winner, do they give the 2nd place winner 1st place money and so on or do they just keep the money?
Theoretically the money should be paid out as if the player hadn't existed, so 2nd goes 1st etc etc. However given the scale of the payout and the likelihood of complaint or dispute, it would be foolish for them to action any form of prize pool adjustment until such time as the confiscated player had time to go through all reasonable legal avenues and the case was fully resolved.