Whats your Donkey Test IQ? - Poker News

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion News, Views, and Gossip

Whats your Donkey Test IQ?

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1 of 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 11

Page 1 of 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 11

07-21-2008 , 10:56 PM

tarath

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,225

I did about the same on both tests, but this test is much better than that other one imo.

Their testimonials are actually from good players.

135
gogogo

Last edited by gregorio; 08-10-2008 at 08:39 AM.

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:02 PM

royce

adept

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,147

what was the deduction for not even bein able to spell donkey correctly?? had to be pretty hefty imo

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:11 PM

tarath

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,225

lolol I am a tard

luckily for me spelling isn't part of poker

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:29 PM

The_Taj

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 4,117

thanks for including a link

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:33 PM

timmay28

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,845

has the test changed since a yr ago?

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:34 PM

tarath

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,225

http://www.donkeytest.com/index.html

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:45 PM

Keyser.

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 11,711

131 iirc. And a big LOL in anticipation of most NVGtards' scores if they don't lie.

Quote

07-21-2008 , 11:45 PM

gregorio

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 39,313

Another thread about this
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...d.php?t=113321

Quote

07-22-2008 , 12:32 AM

Keystoned

enthusiast

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 61

122. I've done this before, you get better results the nittier you play. Can you fold middle set to a reraise? POKER GENIUS!!!

Quote

07-22-2008 , 12:36 AM

#10

Jalman1

adept

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 741

im 113 which makes sense cuz im a pro sng player

Quote

07-22-2008 , 12:38 AM

#11

Ce1ska

banned

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,598

Meh, kind of long, didn't really put to much effort into it.
**Sighhh**117 Pretty rigged IMO.

Quote:

"This is actually quite a neat little test. Definitely biased towards NL Cash, but I like how the test was written, it requires some critical thinking for sure."

--Chris, medium stakes tournament player

+1

Mostly play MTT's FWIW.

LOL

Quote:

"Really stupid test poker is situational not structured this test gives no insight into what a good player is there is no way I'm only a 89 its just stupid."

--Sean, call Station

Quote

07-22-2008 , 01:47 AM

#12

CincyLady

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,934

Yeah, I really don't play cash games, especially at the NL level, just tourney stuff. I'm not sure what is considered a 'good score' and they won't give you a breakdown unless you pay them.

FWIW ... if 87 is a good score, then it was me who took the test ... if not ... well I guess my evil twin sibling Donkella, must of escaped her cage once again.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 03:33 AM

#13

BULLLLDOZZZZZERRRR

banned

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 578

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keystoned

122. I've done this before, you get better results the nittier you play.

This.

According to this website, Gus Hanson just might be the worst player in America.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 03:37 AM

#14

tarath

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,225

Quote:

Originally Posted by BULLLLDOZZZZZERRRR

This.

According to this website, Gus Hanson just might be the worst player in America.

in defense to the test it usually informs you that your image is very TA when its relevant and keep in mind the people your playing tend to be like 13/5 so folding any time they give a lot of action is generally correct.

But I agree the more you nit it up the better you do.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 03:41 AM

#15

GiantWalleye

worst TR ever

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 8,543

i must suck when in half asleep or other people are lying.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 04:54 AM

#16

CaptainRocknRoll

grinder

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 469

119, hurrah.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 07:22 AM

#17

Ricky_Bobby

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,827

A long time ago i think I scored a 118, I'd like to think I'd do better now cuz I know I play better than I did when I took it, but who knows.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 08:10 AM

#18

CharlieBeagle2

adept

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,053

110

isnt a real indication of how good you are though

Quote

07-22-2008 , 09:40 AM

#19

Johnny FlopBoot

journeyman

Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 297

I scored 105. Apparently I am expected to lose slowly in raked games and win in home games.

The reality is actually more like, I win very slowly in raked games, and win with regularity in home games. But, yeah.. not far off.

I think it would be more valid if there was a cash game version, and a tourney version. I don't play tourneys at all, so I don't think I did too well on those questions, but I probably did better than 105 on cash questions.

Who knows..

Last edited by Johnny FlopBoot; 07-22-2008 at 09:41 AM. Reason: emphasis on very slowly... meh...

Quote

07-22-2008 , 10:21 AM

#20

Clayton

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 32,226

Your PokerIQ is: 130

I would have scored higher had the entire test not been full ring

Quote

07-22-2008 , 10:28 AM

#21

Wolitzer

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 1,515

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keyser.

And a big LOL in anticipation of most NVGtards' scores if they don't lie.

That's a huge "if". It's more probable that they will than they won't imo.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 10:57 AM

#22

OneBoredGuy

stranger

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clayton

Your PokerIQ is: 130

I would have scored higher had the entire test not been full ring

It wasn't.

Quote

07-22-2008 , 11:01 AM

#23

unlucky4me

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 4,079

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keystoned

122. I've done this before, you get better results the nittier you play. Can you fold middle set to a reraise? POKER GENIUS!!!

Its a lot different to say what you think the answers should be and what you would actually do. I don't see many people in the highest stakes folding 3 of a kind very often either.