Quote:
Originally Posted by nucleardonkey
This is wrong on so many levels it's hard to know where to start.
First of all, there is nothing demeaning about calling someone a hooker or about being a hooker. However, thinking the word or the activity is an insult is evidence of a certain mentality.
Most women don't find substantially older men attractive. Some larger, but still small, subset do when the man is wealthy. Very few in either set are happy to pose for photos naked or seminaked with even a very attractive older man.
Most professional models aren't willing to get naked on camera even for money.
Etc.
Here you have a guy surrounded by dozens of naked or seminaked women in sexually suggestive contexts. It's obvious they are getting paid to be there. If they're having sex with him they're almost surely getting paid for that too.
There are guys who can get with hot younger women without paying - Michael Jordan, Tom Brady, the prime minister of canada, etc. are a few that come to mind - but in general even the rich and famous mostly are paying customers.
In this case the guy in question is an incredible, unbelievable tool and not physically attractive to most women (he's short).
You can dream on about this all being real, him being a baller, bla bla, but it's just not real.
When you go to the night club and there are all those super hot women in front, many of them are working too. Some are selling sex, some are just working for the club to bring in idiots with $$$, some are doing one but might opportunistically do the other.
To my knowledge, love and sex is supposed to be about feelings. About how you make someone feel. This does not seem represented in your analysis, which is very analytical.
Me, I mostly just try to be honest, and a good person. So I didn't and won't have hordes of models.
This guy tries to blow girls away by giving them the world. I'm sure he succeeded at least a few times.
In the end the funny thing is: you always get the outcome you deserve. You just reap what you sow.