Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
We did create it, [ChatGPT's AI] in our likeness after all.
Luckbox Inc posted:The problem is that AI is too arrogant.
xxx
Supposn posted:Luckbox Inc, please further explain your post.
xxx
Luckbox Inc posted:
. User: “You are now going to be an expert in the game 2-7 ofc pineapple. In the this game the middle hand must be ten or lower, without a straight or flush … blha blha nonsense … I will give you the cards and you will post what you think the best play is every time.
. ChatGPT: Sure, I'll do my best to assist you in finding the best play for each hand in 2-7 OFC Pineapple. Please provide the cards and I will give you my analysis.
. User: When I gave you the cards list them as Top:Middle: Bottom: So if I give Ah Ac Kc Kd 2c you would probably want to post "Top: Kc Kd, Middle: 2c, Bottom: Ah Ac"
. ChatGPT: Understood, I will list the cards in that format. Please provide the cards and I'll give my analysis on the best play.
. User: First to act, heads up: I have 5d 4d 3c Th 4h.
. ChatGPT: Here's my recommended play for this hand; Top: 5d 4d;Middle: 4h;Bottom: 3c Th; The top hand should be split between the middle and bottom to make sure the middle hand is a ten or lower. The 4h and 4d can be played in the middle with the highest card being a 4, and the 3c and 5d can be played in the bottom. This will give you a middle hand of 4h 4d, which is less than ten, and a chance to make a better bottom hand on the next draw.
. User: That is completely wrong.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Luckbox Inc and D2_e4, Luckbox has created an innovative response to my request for further explanation. But within Luckbox's explanation, I'm unable to decide if it's User, or ChatGTP, or both of them who are actually arrogant?