Why AI information and advice is often less than the best or even reasonably better advice or counsel.
To the extents of an internet browser's provide artificial intelligence, (AI) is reluctant to displease, or find fault with, or shock,or disagree with me or with anyone else, that AI's less of use to me and likely is less of use to anyone else.

Regardless of their competence or expertise, to the extents of our counselors' not entirely revealing what they believe is true or the best of likely alternatives, our advisors are not properly advising us. Respectfully, Supposn

Did an AI write this?

Maybe he was enthused with the opportunity to use AI, but turned out disappointed. Son, I am disappoint

D2e4, no, but I appreciate the compliment, I suppose current versions of browser's AIs can and do produce prose superior to my capabilities. My youngest son's writing is usually far superior to my essays.

The problem is that AI is too arrogant.

Luckbox Inc, please further explain your post.

User: You are now going to be an expert in the game 2-7 ofc pineapple. In the this game the middle hand must be ten or lower, without a straight or flush. A wheel (23457) in the middle is worth 8 points and takes you to fantasy land. a pair of aces or kings on top also gets you fantasy. I will give you the cards and you will post what you think the best play is every time.

ChatGPT: Sure, I'll do my best to assist you in finding the best play for each hand in 2-7 OFC Pineapple. Please provide the cards and I will give you my analysis.

User:
When I gave you the cards list them as
Top:
Middle:
Bottom:
So if I give Ah Ac Kc Kd 2c you would probably want to post

"Top: Kc Kd
Middle: 2c
Bottom: Ah Ac"

ChatGPT
Understood, I will list the cards in that format. Please provide the cards and I'll give my analysis on the best play.

User
First to act, heads up: I have 5d 4d 3c Th 4h
ChatGPT
Here's my recommended play for this hand:

Top: 5d 4d
Middle: 4h
Bottom: 3c Th

Chat GPT: The top hand should be split between the middle and bottom to make sure the middle hand is a ten or lower. The 4h and 4d can be played in the middle with the highest card being a 4, and the 3c and 5d can be played in the bottom. This will give you a middle hand of 4h 4d, which is less than ten, and a chance to make a better bottom hand on the next draw.

User: That is completely wrong

If it doesn't know something it'll just start spouting out some random bullshit.

"I don't know" is never an acceptable answer for Chat GPT

We did create it in our likeness after all.

Luckbox Inc posted:The problem is that AI is too arrogant.
xxx
Supposn posted:Luckbox Inc, please further explain your post.
xxx
Luckbox Inc posted:
. User: “You are now going to be an expert in the game 2-7 ofc pineapple. In the this game the middle hand must be ten or lower, without a straight or flush … blha blha nonsense … I will give you the cards and you will post what you think the best play is every time.

. ChatGPT: Sure, I'll do my best to assist you in finding the best play for each hand in 2-7 OFC Pineapple. Please provide the cards and I will give you my analysis.

. User: When I gave you the cards list them as Top:Middle: Bottom: So if I give Ah Ac Kc Kd 2c you would probably want to post "Top: Kc Kd, Middle: 2c, Bottom: Ah Ac"

. ChatGPT: Understood, I will list the cards in that format. Please provide the cards and I'll give my analysis on the best play.

. User: First to act, heads up: I have 5d 4d 3c Th 4h.

. ChatGPT: Here's my recommended play for this hand; Top: 5d 4d;Middle: 4h;Bottom: 3c Th; The top hand should be split between the middle and bottom to make sure the middle hand is a ten or lower. The 4h and 4d can be played in the middle with the highest card being a 4, and the 3c and 5d can be played in the bottom. This will give you a middle hand of 4h 4d, which is less than ten, and a chance to make a better bottom hand on the next draw.

. User: That is completely wrong.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Luckbox Inc and D2_e4, Luckbox has created an innovative response to my request for further explanation. But within Luckbox's explanation, I'm unable to decide if it's User, or ChatGTP, or both of them who are actually arrogant?

Dude, you post like a (very) early attempt at AI.

D2_e4, as I previously responded to you: QUOTE=Supposn;58514192]D2e4, no, but I appreciate the compliment, I suppose current versions of browser's AIs can and do produce prose superior to my capabilities. My youngest son's writing is usually far superior to my essays.[/QUOTE]

I definitely know enough to know that you'd absolutely never play a hand of OFC 2-7/p that way. It seems pretty clear that GPT doesn't understand the game at all

Luckbox Inc, obviously I was wrong. It's you, Luckbox who's arrogant.

Are you trying to argue that there is a chance that Chat GPT is correct about how that hand should be played?

-----
There is none. It's pure insanity and is basically throwing all objectives about the game out of the window. You really want to be going to fantasy and you do that by making a wheel in the middle or AA or KK on top, and the chat GPT play abandons both of those.

5d 4d 3c Th 4h.

The options are

345
T4hh
Or
--
35
44T
Or even possibly just putting a 4 on top like

4h
345
T, but that seems bad even if a 4 is dead since it's suited to the 10. I would probably play the 2nd option where you're sort of abandoning hope for a wheel but giving yourself the ability to make strong hands elsewhere.

But what ChatGPT suggested is just insane.

Counselor??!

Luckbnox inc, no, I never claimed to understand anything about “2-7 ofc pineapple”. I supposed it might be something similar to the story of the “flypaper report”.

I suspected 2-7 ofc pineapple may be a name or a game you've created, and possibly there are no rules to the game other than what may be in your own mind. Possibly there is no reasonable strategy to play the game.
Of course, I may still be wrong regarding your posts on this matter. You can be lying to all of us. My being less than correct is not a rare occurrence. Respectfully, Supposn

Have you tried googling about it?