Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
The questions I asked is very simple. I can't defend my post when you won't even tell me which pat of my post you don't agree with.
LOL. Well if they made movies about something then it must be real. Let me guess you think a delorean can go back in the future?
There are some policies that when enacted have an immediate impact on things while others make take months or even years to feel the real effects of them (FYI - this is common sense for most).
For example, increasing the amount of money the government prints by 3x for 2 years, giving that money away and shutting the economy we all saw had a very positive short term effect but now we now know is having some terrible long-term effects.
No matter if we are talking about the rate at which money was printed, given out and how long the economy was shut down post covid, the act passed under clinton or a doctor that continues to give a car wreck victim morphine for 3 month straight instead of actually fixing his broken arm at some point you have the pay the piper.
- All your post was wrong , not just part of it .
U want me to go back and repost all the data’s showing that your post is nonsense for like the fifth time ?
- Are u claiming all movies are science fiction ?
- Tell me which policy takes 7-10 years to take effect ending up blaming Clinton while by passing 2 full terms of buddy ?
And if by some miracle one policy would work like that (which they don’t) , why didn’t bush stop it if it was so damaging ?
U giving a pass to bush for being inactive of banning a legislation for 8 years ?
And the funny thing in all of this is u even admit monetary policy have big effect in house prices and other area inside of a 2-3 years period and yet …..
U claim bush era wasn’t responsible for 2008 crisis but Clinton was while HUGE monetary changes happened during bush term ?…
So monetary policies have significant effect on the economy but exceptionally not during 1 time all the history under bush ?
U make a lot of sense champ !