I mean, it sure looks like you are making the thread about me. you can stop any time.

.

thats not what sealioning is btw. not that it really matters. its kinda the opposite in that I really dont want to engage substantively with you on your opinions about well...me. if you want to talk about the war and the motivations and actions of the main players, I will be happy to engage. but I dont really want to talk about myself as much as you do.

sealioning is when you ask a bunch of bad faith questions trying to get a rise out of a person while feigning civility. I am not asking for any evidence or citations from you.

Are you kidding me right now or has sealioning become so second nature to you that you don't even recognize it anymore?







When you give this clearly bad faith attempt at describing how I've dealt with you over the past year, the logical way to disprove what you're saying is to provide the evidence which disproves it. You've asked the bunch of bad faith questions, they've been addressed. You've posted the bunch of bad faith arguments which have been refuted. Over a year ago I called you out on this: you will say something, be shown clear evidence how it is false, disappear, and then come back a little while later with the same argument as if it hadn't been debunked.

You are now, once again in bad faith, saying that I haven't done these things so I should supply the bunches of evidence. Well here they are, these are just the ones from the past month. I think anyone ITT will attest to the fact that I've addressed them multiple times in the previous thread and likely several more times in this thread. I find it hard to believe that you forgot all of these, so it is absolutely sea lioning.

I literally havent asked you any questions other than a simple request to stop making this thread about me.

seriously, look up what sealioning is.

wait...

lol

There was no war with Russia.

Why would have Russia taken less land if talked with lol.

We want a weaker Russia which absolutely means we don't want Russia to get it's hand to more farmland and natural resources. Still nothing to do with not taking Ukraine side every time.

This has all been addressed. Focusing on the semantics of "question", which is from your own definition and not the actual definition is especially lol. Actual definition:


You are 100% doing this, read my post on it to see how! You are also continually making the thread about you then complaining it's about you and blaming me for your own actions.

Before you get into the semantics of what "request" means. By calling me a liar and intentionally misrepresenting the past year you are absolutely requesting evidence.

I last lived in China in 2015 (I think), I just never update my profile. What point were you making though?

anyway you have like a third of the posts itt, without victor it'd be 41%. you really want a thread to just jack yourself off, why? i mean in addition than that blog thread where you do the exact same thing... weird

bruv, Im not asking you for any evidence. I just posted to say that I do not support Putin or Russia. you have been relentlessly attacking me ever since. I dont even bother to refute your twisting of facts anymore. I just kindly ask that you stop doing it.

Without Victor ITT then other posters would begin to participate again and it would no longer be a thread "to just jack yourself off".


Without Victor my post count ITT would go down, not up.

When you falsely claim that I have not addressed your arguments, then that is a request for evidence.


You can say you don't support Putin or Russia all you want, that's a request for evidence too, and it's been provided. If you recall, it resulted in your calling your own arguments illogical and spreading lies that you were not allowed to address your own logic.

so long as those posters steadfastly toed the party line.

you are twisting words a lot. and you are trying to get me to talk about Palestine when it has been deemed verboten for the moment. even insulting me and calling me a liar when sir I assure you that I am correct that it is illegal for most of us to discuss that topic at this very moment.

Another bad faith argument. I have conversed with plenty of posters who do not agree with me and if they are willing to post in faith I am willing to address their arguments. The problem is when they do not post in good faith, the way that you are doing now.

no, I am posting in good faith. I am asking once again, to stop making this thread about me. you can stop any time.

You are twisting words here and also making a bad faith assumption of what I am trying to discuss, even after I have corrected you several times (kind of a pattern). The argument has nothing to do with Palestine even if it was posted in the Palestine thread. The thing I am drawing attention to is the logic of the post, we can completely remove the specific details if you wish.








Address that.

This:




is the direct opposite of this:

how can I address that without discussing the specifics of the situation that I am not supposed to discuss?

The point is the specifics of the situations do not matter: either the logic works or it doesn't. Does it work or does it not?

I mean if you are going to troll me and call me a liar about an easily provable fact then yes I am going to keep going. crossnerd made her request clear. I am abiding by it. you are not.

I am abiding by it. You are using it as an excuse to not address your hypocrisy.

I have no idea what I've trolled you about or when I have called you a liar when you are not.

I think the specifics matter. I think they are very important.

Thank you, that is all I wanted to hear. "Rules for thee but not for me."

If a non-Victor poster goes into a thread and criticizes both sides, Victor can deem that person to be on one side but not the other.

If Victor goes into a thread and criticizes only one side for over a year, then it is not ok to accuse Victor of being on one side over the other.