Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
There is not a general thread for the election but I wanted to discuss what I think might be an important issue.
Do you think Trump is getting hammered because there is just much less influence attack from foreign interests via social media etc, and that social media whilst still a long way from perfect has matured slightly in terms of defending against such?
Even on this forum itself there seems a lot less newposterlowpostcountobvioustrollhouse posting going on in general.
Just putting it out there, because I am sure in the last election the Hunter thing would have got more legs given how entrenched and persistent but her emails became.
I think the voters are more wise to the 'influence attacks'.
There was no real defense to the Hilary one and when the only one truly defending is the accused you are behind the 8 ball. Hilary was forced to defend across the board from Fox type outlets to CNN and MSNBC. While 'explain this...' may seem like a neutral question, we know it is not perceived that way by many. The more thou doth protest, the guiltier one appears to many.
Also this one was so painfully obvious and poorly executed. Trump was really counting on Barr to give him the predicate for the investigation to then build upon. Instead he had to settle for Rudy being the one to force it into the dialogue.
Considering everyone knew Trump was screaming for this to happen for so long, it obviously looked very convenient that suddenly Rudy had the goods to deliver now.
And while i do think the prior poster pointing to Joe 'favorability somewhat accurate, I still think had Hilary not happened last year, and society not prepared for this type of attack, and if this was the first one ever, it likely would have taken Biden down too.
Pretty amazing really considering if both sides were equally scrutinized it would be the Trump family who would be exposed as the true First Family of Crime.