Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Cuepee,
I think rugby is a much better example than volleyball.
I was speaking to your underlying logic.
Sports like Volleyball and Rugby were both played historically and rightly according to a biological sex differences and safety was a big component of that.
Now as we see gender considerations over take biological ones, the 'safety' issues return to the fore.
If your point is 'I don't have much sympathy for any female suffering an injury because in SOME instances in these sports they play them in 'mixed sex' play', then it is hard to see how your logic and lack of sympathy would not apply to rugby or soccer or any sport, where historically men can and do use increased physicality to try and beat competitors they feel have a weakness to that.
For instance, if a team is known is known to be full of finesse and skilled players who are not that tough, the opposition will often create a game plan to paly them in the most punishing and physical way possible. To hurt them, to slow them, to make their best players head to the bench and not return.
I struggle to see how you would distinguish your position as we move between sports other than some very arbitrary 'ok, fine, now soccer (or rugby) is doing enough harm to women that I think it should stop'. It's almost as if your position is ok with 'X' injuries but not ok with 'Y' as opposed to just addressing the premise for the injuries and addressing that??