Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
It seems that you are using a different definition for the words than some others are. When I say my "mother", I don't mean "my parent who identifies as a female". I mean "the person who gave birth to me". Even if that person changes gender, he is still "the person who gave birth to me". I would suspect that more people identify with my definition of mother than of yours.
And if I did use your terminology, I would now have two fathers and no mothers, so if I refer to in conversation to "my father", it would no longer refer to a specific person. I guess I would have to begin referring to them as "my birthing parent" and "my inseminating parent". Is that actually what you want?
I just had to make up "inseminating parent", but it seems the most logical thing. Is there actually a term that some people are using to refer to the person who contributed the sperm to replace "father"?
You are really, really, really overthinking this.
If it happened in my family, I expect we'd settle on some way my "new" father wanted to be referred to, and roll with that. And depending on what it was, it might make for some fun explanations, which I'd be just fine with.
That's not to say it wouldn't be really ****ing weird for me and many others, and something that would take a lot of getting used to. But it wouldn't be about me. I'm not the one going through the change, and I'm not the one who may have been holding this in for the last 50+ years, so it's on me to deal with it. Or not. I could just keep talking to everyone about my mother as if nothing had changed, but if that wasn't what they wanted, then I think that would be a pretty big dick move on my part and I expect it would harm our relationship.
But if you're really concerned, you could probably check in with someone who has two dads and doesn't know who gave birth to them. It could be that they've found a way through this ever-so-tricky conundrum of what to call everyone.