Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
I raised the question about whether people thought your claims about ID were transphobic and Master answered in the affirmative.
Ill wait on his testimony and not your perspective on your interchange before moving on from that affirmative because your testimony is not worth ****.
Which is the exact reason here we are stuck in u said no he said, which just does not happen with any poster but you.
Incorrect, you raised the assumption that the reason they think I'm transphobic is because of my off the wall proposed potential solution as ID designation and also put an "ETC"
Then master came in and said "yeah i told him what I was mad about, and its this: *something that had nothing to do with ID*" and now you are using that to declare victory.
You INTERPRETED masters words incorrectly, it's also easy to see you did because of the content of their posts and previous posts.
Master probably thinks the ID idea is transphobic, but if you asked them why they think I'm transphobic, it would certainly be the thing they have stated over 5 times, not something they've never said FFS.
It also just so happens the ID thing is a loaded thing, if nobody was transphobic the id designation would be fine, but the transphobes abuse it. Most people who want the trans designation want it so they can abuse it.
You don't need my testimony to prove you wrong because you can look at the dated posts and see when their objections were raised, and what they said their objections were. Not so shockingly you won't find ID!
You literally had similar disagreements with LOLLOL, so stop this "just you" stuff.