Opinion here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...8-587_5ifl.pdf
CNN:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/18/polit...urt/index.html
It seems like there's a lot of legal nuance here, with the decision really being several different decisions, with justices concurring or dissenting in different groups on different parts. One thing I've always been a little confused about is just what the core legal argument is, since one would naïvely assume that a program created by executive order could be ended by one.
From scrolling through some of the chat on
SCOTUSBlog, my impression is that the decision is basically procedural. It's not arguing that Trump absolutely can't rescind DACA, but more or less that they did it incompetently -- "arbitrary and capricious, under the Administrative Procedures Act" is how SCOTUSBlog describes it.
So, basically they just send it back to DHS and they try again? I would love some opinions from the lawyers. I haven't had time yet to understand what aspects of the decision were found to be arbitrary and capricious. It seems like the first section of the ruling is pretty narrowly about deficiencies in the explanation offered by the administration for ending the program.