Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
That seems meant to comply with the law, or do mean it goes beyond that?
I do. So we are also asking if private AI should be different, should the government have more control over AI than twitter etc.
First of all, "we" are not asking, you are. Secondly, can you clarify whether this is something you think is happening now (government having control over ChatGPT), or something you're worried about in the future? Earlier, you alluded to controversy around OpenAI, but never clarified what that was. I don't know if you meant the Sam Altman vs the Board silliness, or if this is something about Biden's Executive Order regarding AI, or something else. But in your OP you mention ChatGPT censoring you, which doesn't seem to line up with either of those things. Some clarity would be good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metod Tinuviel
To me the biggest difference is ChatGpt is a tool, it is not a website used to communicate. I hate not having control of how I run programs. If I want it to rewrite Mein Kampf in the style of dr seus or write an erotic story about a toaster falling in love with a dishwasher I want to have that freedom. To me it is like if my pen refused to move if I tried to draw a pair of titties. Now if I repost this new rhyming Mein Kampf on 2+2 in order to indoctrinate middle age poker players and the mods take it down, I have no issue with that.
Well, that is a difference, but I don't think it changes anything. If someone wants to create a tool, they can put restrictions in if they want to, and you can choose whether or not to use it.