Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I'm not going to take it again just now, but I've probably posted my chart from this test a half dozen times across various forums, including probably even this version of 2+2 politics (just slightly to the right of wiiziwiig in the left/libertarian box).
I have two complaints with it:
1) It's been around a long time and as far as I can tell has never been updated. I think the questions were topical at the time it was put together, and the topicality made it somewhat useful. But the further removed the test gets from contemporary politics the more I think it just misses a lot by not asking relevant questions
2) It's always been obvious that the test is designed in part to promote the correctness of left/libertarian views. Not that I mind, I share those views. But I'm very certain that results tend to cluster towards the bottom left in a way that is misleading. Similarly, I recall the site posting charts where they plot where well known political figures are supposed to be, and I'm pretty sure their positioning is just entirely fabricated.
See also: the Pew Political Typology quiz I posted a while back (results here). That has its own issues, of course.
I got -5.75 / -7.03 but yeah this is garbage. My problems with it are very different from yours though. These types of questionaires tend to miss much more relevant questions entirely;
1) How much you care about any given issue and which issues are important to you and which ones you don't care about, but happen to know what the right thing to say about them. The vast majority of people don't care about more than a few issues and a large majority don't care that much about any issue. This is true even of lots of "well-informed" partisans - most of their views aren't deeply held convictions, but surface-level identification based on their social needs.
2) Pragmatism vs idealism - the willingness to compromise to get things done. This tends to be weakly correlated with how much you care. Contrary to what people might think, for most normal people on most normal things, the more you care, typically the more you're willing to compromise. It's much easier to be inflexibly ideological when your beliefs aren't motivated by the desire to see concrete change. With that said, politics is driven by extremes so those that are both inflexibly single-minded and care to an extreme extent about an issue could disproportionately alter the course of history.