It's proly. Loser to equal but lol Dems as usual

cite anything

I mean, come on. Wtf?

Obviously 160% of Democrats deny that Trump was legitimately elected.

I’ll give you some hints:

It was recent. It was a presidential election. A massive number of dems questioned the election - many of whom publicly questioned the legitimacy of the election throughout the 4 years following the election. The dems spent a sick amount of money investigating the integrity of the election and a sick amount of time publicizing the investigation to make sure every American would learn that our elections weren’t safe. This was the first major questioning of the integrity of an election in recent US history and likely inspired trump to question the integrity of the election he lost.

This is like asking someone to site the score of this past Thursday night’s nfl score. There is no need to site such a widely reported fact. It was one of the most talked about topics over the 4 years trump was president.

Google or YouTube “dems calling trump illegitimate” and the first article or video will likely show you 20 different dems questioning the integrity of the election - if it doesn’t then click on the next one.

yeah stick it to them Mickey.

Mickey has just pointed out one of your many inconsistencies and hypocracies.

why can't the reps say the election was rigged and then they are crazies and totally wrong but you can for 4 years??? on what planet is that fair?

He cited something saying about 80% of Republicans are election deniers. He meant to cite something with a percentage like that. If there is any study showing that, it certainly wasn't widely reported.

20 people is not anywhere near 80% of Democrats, and you said twice as many Democrats were election deniers, which is impossible.

Also, the 2016 election was certainly not the most questioned election ever, or even in my adult lifetime. The 2000 election had a state's counting procedure going to the Supreme Court.

What are u talking about …..
The 2016 election results never been in question by dems !
When did dems question the results ????

No democrats ever disputed the 2016 election results !
There is a distinction between trump actions during its presidency and how he manages his own campaign but not democrats ever dispute the democratic process or election results .

But I’m not surprise u can’t distinguish the 2 ……

they were.


https://www.torontosun.com/opinion/c...d7e9d350b/amp/


https://www.amazon.com/Rigged-Media-.../dp/168451259X


https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/f...ge/3770232001/

Trump took dozens upon dozens of his election grievances to various Courts and everyone accepted that is a fine path. No one has to agree with things that happened in an election. People are allowed to disagree.

But that is entirely different, then not conceding the election and using tactics to try and disrupt and stop the peaceful transfer of power. There are a lot of people going to jail for the later and rightly so. So your whatabout is just nonsense as always.

I just debunked some bs narrative from Toronto sun in the Canada thread about coal .
Hillary accepted the election results right away .
The results are never in questions .
Some politician lost their election because not all voters can voters because of law as nothing to do with the election process and saying it was cheated or rigged …



Then u quote a book .

I mean if u can’t see distinction between the 2 , I just can’t help you there .

she says the election was stolen:

How many court cases did she file contesting the results?

Jfc…. U really are at a first degree level …

That is comparable to trump and having millions of citizens claiming the elections was stolen .

A word catch out of a phrase with many possible meaning ?
Wtf .

Well your general posting is really comprehensible to me now ….

jesus washoe just owned you guys. pretty pathetic.

Lol
Ok ….

If 16 was stolen so was 20. If 20 was stolen so was 16. It’s literally that easy


And the dems did say the 16 election was a scam. Also Hillary lied and manipulated the DNC to get the nomination. So it clearly was not legit although not for the reasons people think


Just like in 2008 republicans let McCain run even though he wasn’t born in the US and is therefore ineligible to run for president.

Both were investigated. The Trump campaign could not be given a clean bill of health despite the federal government itself running the investigation. For 2020 numerous states were not able to find anything despite the fact they were investigating political opponents. Though to be fair I'm sympathetic toi the idea that Trumpy Republicans are so dumb they wouldn't be able to properly run an investigation. But that just means nobody that knows anything actually thinks Trump somehow got more votes in GA, AZ etc than Biden. 2020.

Google or YouTube “republicans calling biden illegitimate” and the first article or video will likely show you 20 different republicans questioning the integrity of the election - if it doesn’t then click on the next one

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna26241

“ At least 23 people who deny the results of the 2020 election are running for secretary of state in 19 states across the U.S., according to the group — a number that has alarmed voting and elections experts. ”

The hypothetical 2016 equivalent of 2020 would of course be if then sitting president Barack Obama and his administration refused to commit to a peaceful transition of power and used the power of his office and his political influence to pressure members of congress and state officials to toss the election outcome and declare a different winner.

I am not denying that some repubs think the 2020 election was rigged. I’m only saying trump used the dem playbook from when he won when they claimed his election was not fair.

Bahbamamms

What's a bigger number 30 or 147?

That's the difference between democratic members of congress who objected to Ohio's electoral results (which Kerry said he would have no part in because he conceded) and the number of republican members of congress who objected to the entire electoral process and were actively encouraged by the losing candidate. And they still puss and moan.

What's a bigger number 0 or 1.

0 is the number of democratic presidents who encouraged a storm of the capital and continued baseless accusations of voter fraud. 1 is the number of Republican presidents who did encourage all that.

Again go **** yourself. My hands are itching doing a lot of squeezing exercises.

You aren’t suggesting that claims of Biden’s win being illegitimate were more widely supported than trumps win being illegitimate are you?

Trump said people should storm the capital or they should go to the capital peacefully?

You think there is 0 voter fraud in the US? That is certainly an interesting take.

I don’t understand what you mean by wanting to squeeze stuff.