Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
. You clearly didn't know that Crowdstrike, the org hired by the DNC to make tha determination, said they couldn't make that determination.
They never get close to saying the above, the above is total utter falsehood.
You seem to be suffering from some kind of cognitive dissonance that prevents you from parsing English properly.
Let me paraphrase what Crowd strike actually said so maybe the penny drops. Whilst it is a paraphrase, the meaning is 100% accurate reflection of what CS actually said.
"What evidence we have seen though not concrete but circumstantial is enough for us to determine 100% with total and utter confidence, with no room for doubt or ambiguity, that Russian agents hacked the DNC."
They make the above claim repeatedly.
What ever evidence they found, they never express ambiguity about the hack, when asked they reply "Yes Russia hacked the DNC 100%"
Another thing you seem to suffer from is not being able to parse cite quality.
1:CS had access to DNC Binney did not.
2:CS is a non partisan third party organisation. Binney is a self confessed partisan Trump voter.
3:CS based their conclusion (100% confidence of Russian hack off DNC) on access to the DNC. Binney based
all his work on claims made buy Guccifer 2.0. These claims turned out to be fake.
You are wrong and it could not be being made more clear to you how absolutely clearly and obviously wrong you are. You have been led to the water but delusion wont let you drink.