Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
From such activity they assert fully and with utmost confidence that Russian agents acted to breach DNC data storage and indexes.
Why do you think anonymous sources from the intelligence community mean anything than that whatever they are saying is probably a lie?
More semantics. Maybe I should have said they didn't even assert they had proof. That doesn't change the meaning of what they said.
If you read the Intelligence Committee transcripts of the interview and come away with any other opinion than that Crowdstrike has no evidence that Russia actually stole any data then you are an utter moron beyond help. There is no hard proof. There is only circumstantial "evidence" which doesn't mean crap.
What they are saying is on the level of "had the suspect committed the murder there would have been a dead body, so what we observed was consistent with the suspect being the perpetrator". Look at how you lower yourself into pure, shameless lying. Why? Are you a fascist? I feel like we are looking at two ends of a fascist body politic between people like you and the Trumpers.
Bill Binney says it was physically impossible to have been a remote hack. He tried to warn us about the unconstitutional actions being undertaken by our government spying on us. Little did he know this country has been incubating a fresh batch of utter cowards who will volunteer to have their brains bleached by MSNBC and FOX news every night and don't care about truth or justice, only plugging into the consumer rewards feedback loops and not ever thinking. Little did he knows these sniveling little craven muppets wouldn't care in the least.
That transcript was suppressed by Schiff because he didn't want the truth to get out. If he actually thought he had the goods the evidence would be touted far and wide.
And you're trying to represent Crowdstrike as objective because they also take republican money? That's really lame on a lot of levels. It's all the same state-corporate complex.The company president was a former FBI executive assistant director (under Mueller). One of the co-founders is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. These are neoliberal scumbag liars, and they have parsed their language here. They are using language which is vague and general so it can be misinterpreted in favorable ways but at the same time has to say that they have no proof. When they say the "saw activity that we believed was consistent with activity weÂ’d seen previously and had associated with the Russian Government." That could mean anything. On the only issue that matters they had to admit they don't have the goods because so many other technologists have already made that point.