Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
QP - posts video of Putin saying "yes we wanted Trump'
Deuces McKracken - Oh he said it but is does not count because I have reasons.
Finally you have a half accurate summary after some editing.
But overall you keep doing this thing where you focus on some insignificant aspect, like what Putin wanted, and then you make the case for it so poorly that I feel the need to correct you. Then we go back and forth on said insignificant aspect. It's kind of like the Iraq WMDs debate. Everyone got caught up on whether they had them or not and simply conceded the premise, the utterly ridiculous premise, that if they had them then the war was justified. We shouldn't have been in Iraq whether they had WMDs or not.
Why are you so focused on aspects that don't matter? In fact how the investigation started really doesn't matter either. Like let's take what clearly happened and assume it's true. Let's assume that Brennan just decided Trump and Flynn were not going to uproot what the defense sector has going no matter what and concocted some sham investigation to take Trump and Flynn down on obstruction and, in the meantime, create an anti-Trump rumor mill to run negative ads against Trump. If we were to just drop the charade we all know that's what really happened. Were that true but, by accident, they actually caught Trump in legitimate impeachable offenses I wouldn't really give a damn that it started crooked. It's how the investigation was conducted- disinformation warfare of the type now being waged by the other side. Phantom ballots and phantom Russian state ties to troll farms are just different lies with the same purpose. Where does this lead?