Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Riggie containment thread Riggie containment thread

01-11-2021 , 03:58 PM
Nice. The catch and release program by Bobo and Rococo may have worked in this instance. Though I still hope he doesn’t procreate.
01-11-2021 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er

Also to the other emotional posters on here .... calm down it’s called a debate you get excidet because I attack an idea you have but your not properly equipped with required equipment to defend the idea , hence your anger . Lol I’m done Rocco and boba definitely have good points did change slight perception on some instances for me but over all I’m gonna say it’s definitely over for trump but I think without a doubt there was voter fraud .... enough to turn the election we will never know ....
LOL
01-11-2021 , 04:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFlushDiamonds
LOL
It's like they go out of their way to parody themselves.
01-11-2021 , 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
Another one? You mean the only misquote I had answering 20 different questions from 20 different people on 4 different social media platforms...( hyperbole , before “ actually it’s 5 ....... “or whatever ) all the while 4 tabling acr. ..... yeah . One minor slip but they still didn’t deny the case so that must mean there is some merit ....

Also to the other emotional posters on here .... calm down it’s called a debate you get excidet because I attack an idea you have but your not properly equipped with required equipment to defend the idea , hence your anger . Lol I’m done Rocco and boba definitely have good points did change slight perception on some instances for me but over all I’m gonna say it’s definitely over for trump but I think without a doubt there was voter fraud .... enough to turn the election we will never know ....
To be blunt, all this sentence does is show you are completely ignorant of what happened with the SC case. The argument from Thomas/Alito was was nothing more than them saying that they believed that the SC was obliged to allow the filing. The statement (it wasn't even technically a dissent) is purely a legal disagreement on the role of the SC with regard to state disputes and quite explicitly says nothing about the merits of the case.

For all you claim that people are being deceived by the media and they need to look at the direct evidence, the bolded sentence could not be a more perfect example of having a pre-conceived opinion and trying to fit the facts to it, regardless of whether the facts actually provide any evidence in support of the conclusion.
01-11-2021 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
Another one? You mean the only misquote I had answering 20 different questions from 20 different people on 4 different social media platforms...( hyperbole , before “ actually it’s 5 ....... “or whatever ) all the while 4 tabling acr. ..... yeah . One minor slip but they still didn’t deny the case so that must mean there is some merit ....

Also to the other emotional posters on here .... calm down it’s called a debate you get excidet because I attack an idea you have but your not properly equipped with required equipment to defend the idea , hence your anger . Lol I’m done Rocco and boba definitely have good points did change slight perception on some instances for me but over all I’m gonna say it’s definitely over for trump but I think without a doubt there was voter fraud .... enough to turn the election we will never know ....
False.

Your claims that Trump's claims have only been brought by others is a lie. Rudy has taken cases into court, and then promptly told the judge 'no fraud to see here' when explaining what the cases were alleging.

You lie on both those fronts.
01-11-2021 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
Another one? You mean the only misquote I had answering 20 different questions from 20 different people on 4 different social media platforms...( hyperbole , before “ actually it’s 5 ....... “or whatever ) all the while 4 tabling acr. ..... yeah . One minor slip but they still didn’t deny the case so that must mean there is some merit ....
Bolded is risible.

You lack even a rudimentary understanding of the law.
01-11-2021 , 05:09 PM
Yup. Fishfood, like many Trumpsters is opining on a subject he has child level comprehension of.

I can literally file a lawsuit against anyone right now for any reason.

I could see one person steal something from another and I could sue the thief.

A court will look at it, and one of the findings they may dismiss under is that I simply have no standing to bring it, thus dismissed.

That does not mean my suit had any merit. It is not suggested in any way.

And the SC judges knew or guessed some might try to pretend that was within their answer and as such made specific reference to say that was not the case. And yet Trumpsters still pretend it was.
01-12-2021 , 01:05 AM
01-12-2021 , 01:36 AM


Solid words to live by.
01-12-2021 , 03:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99


Solid words to live by.
Worth repeating!
01-12-2021 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
Bolded is risible.

You lack even a rudimentary understanding of the law.
i bet you dont want to go toe to toe on bird law .... cool profession debating what the word "is" is . i guess ill have to settle for an engineering degree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
Yup. Fishfood, like many Trumpsters is opining on a subject he has child level comprehension of.

I can literally file a lawsuit against anyone right now for any reason.

I could see one person steal something from another and I could sue the thief.

A court will look at it, and one of the findings they may dismiss under is that I simply have no standing to bring it, thus dismissed.

That does not mean my suit had any merit. It is not suggested in any way.

And the SC judges knew or guessed some might try to pretend that was within their answer and as such made specific reference to say that was not the case. And yet Trumpsters still pretend it was.
actually it said he had standing , and didnt express an opinon merit but who fkn cares man if you want to believe all these people are willing to lie underoath then go ahead but its just your fkn opinon. i think 75 million people believing the election is fraudulent is merit enough. so many instances of fraud you cant take this away , you can say its not true and hold your breath until your blue but you moral authoritarians didnt win in court thats all that matters to the rest of us. if it was such an easy win they should have taken in .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habman
Worth repeating!
Hmmm racist like joe biden saying hes going to priorities " black , latino , and women business owners over the rest" like this example of literal racism?

or the principle councel of PBS micheal beller saying they should take trumpers kids away and put maga people in camps lol like literally doing what the nazis did? now we can debate the hypocrisy of the left this will be much easier than defending fat donny.
01-12-2021 , 06:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
actually it said he had standing , and didnt express an opinon merit but who fkn cares man if you want to believe all these people are willing to lie underoath then go ahead but its just your fkn opinon.
Holy **** dude, just take the L and move on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
i think 75 million people believing the election is fraudulent is merit enough.
Making things up really doesn't help your case.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
so many instances of fraud you cant take this away , you can say its not true and hold your breath until your blue but you moral authoritarians didnt win in court thats all that matters to the rest of us. if it was such an easy win they should have taken in . .
I'm trying to figure out what this means. None of us were in court; what is it you're referring to? It can't be the court cases about election fraud, because those were all lost by Trump's lawyers and supporters, so...what are you on about?
01-12-2021 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
i bet you dont want to go toe to toe on bird law .... cool profession debating what the word "is" is . i guess ill have to settle for an engineering degree.
Bird law? As in "law related to birds"?

That's a somewhat esoteric area of the law. And you are correct. I don't know much about bird law.

I feel so foolish talking to you about litigation now. You really got me.
01-12-2021 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
Bird law? As in "law related to birds"?

That's a somewhat esoteric area of the law. And you are correct. I don't know much about bird law.

I feel so foolish talking to you about litigation now. You really got me.
Bahahahaha Omfg I haven’t laughed that hard in a while, it’s just a bit from the show always sunny in Philadelphia( I thought everyone watched that show) I highly recommend you watch it as-well you will probably do the same.
01-12-2021 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood69er
Bahahahaha Omfg I haven’t laughed that hard in a while, it’s just a bit from the show always sunny in Philadelphia( I thought everyone watched that show) I highly recommend you watch it as-well you will probably do the same.
Ah. You can't watch everything. I haven't seen even one episode.
01-12-2021 , 10:01 PM
60 court cases and in everyone Trumps own representative went in they either quickly said 'no your honor, we are not claiming. Nope not us. That is not what we are saying here' and/or they got their asses laughed out of court.

That is what matters. Full access to all the courts at all levels, many with Trump appointees literally mocking the cases brought forth as pure garbage.


If you claim a major crime, and petition courts and get your days in court at all levels with your own appointees and you then go in and say 'I got nothing' to only return to twitter and say 'so much evidence!!!' that is on you.

You are a dupe, plain and simple.
01-12-2021 , 10:22 PM
I'm sure anyone who created an SN ending in 69 is a serious debater.
01-12-2021 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habman
Worth repeating!
It really doesn't get any more clear or simple
01-13-2021 , 02:14 AM
As I have a bad habit of doing once a week or so, I hopped over to my FB friend of a FB friend conspiracy theorist's page tonight to see what she is posting. It's usually mostly Covid stuff, but she dabbles in a lot of other conspiracies as well, of course, including election fraud nonsense.

I went down the rabbit hole a little and watched a couple of videos - wow! I hope it's OK to share a really short one, because the insanity is just amazing.

https://phibetaiota.net/2021/01/unri...ud-commission/

In just 3 minutes you learn that no president will be sworn in until April 1st...yes, April Fool's Day. Trump will be using the Emergency Broadcast System and forcing all networks to play his broadcast under threat of losing their FCC license, criminal action, and possibly a military takeover. JFK Jr. is alive, but NOT slated to be vice president. Wow, I didn't even know that was a thing, and it's already over. I need to keep up! Very educational 3 minutes.
01-13-2021 , 02:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I'm sure anyone who created an SN ending in 69 is a serious debater.
I'm suzzer99 because suzzer69 looked too stupid, even though I was born in 69.
01-13-2021 , 02:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
As I have a bad habit of doing once a week or so, I hopped over to my FB friend of a FB friend conspiracy theorist's page tonight to see what she is posting. It's usually mostly Covid stuff, but she dabbles in a lot of other conspiracies as well, of course, including election fraud nonsense.

I went down the rabbit hole a little and watched a couple of videos - wow! I hope it's OK to share a really short one, because the insanity is just amazing.

https://phibetaiota.net/2021/01/unri...ud-commission/

In just 3 minutes you learn that no president will be sworn in until April 1st...yes, April Fool's Day. Trump will be using the Emergency Broadcast System and forcing all networks to play his broadcast under threat of losing their FCC license, criminal action, and possibly a military takeover. JFK Jr. is alive, but NOT slated to be vice president. Wow, I didn't even know that was a thing, and it's already over. I need to keep up! Very educational 3 minutes.
It never seems to matter to these people that none of their nonsense ever comes true. There are some of them on chiefsplanet. They just keep plowing ahead, completely undeterred.

It will be interesting to see what the Q crowd comes up with when Trump is out of office. I suspect it will just more of the same 5D chess nonsense - Trump needed to step down to get Dems to expose themselves, arrests are coming any day now, Trump will be reinstated.
01-13-2021 , 02:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
I'm suzzer99 because suzzer69 looked too stupid, even though I was born in 69.
Pretty sure the best 2+2 posters were all born in '69.

Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
It never seems to matter to these people that none of their nonsense ever comes true. There are some of them on chiefsplanet. They just keep plowing ahead, completely undeterred.

It will be interesting to see what the Q crowd comes up with when Trump is out of office. I suspect it will just more of the same 5D chess nonsense - Trump needed to step down to get Dems to expose themselves, arrests are coming any day now, Trump will be reinstated.
Yeah, I was commenting on some of her posts every week, and a while ago finally stopped and said I would come back on the 20th and see how all her projections had turned out. My only plan is just to check in and see if she has reconsidered any of the sources she follows now that everything they "predicted" turned out to be wrong, over and over again. I already know what the answer will be, and then I'll try to stop even checking on her page.
01-13-2021 , 04:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
I'm suzzer99 because suzzer69 looked too stupid, even though I was born in 69.
OK, grandad, we'll turn up your oxygen when we need you to pipe up.
01-13-2021 , 04:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Pretty sure the best 2+2 posters were all born in '57.
FYP
01-13-2021 , 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
As I have a bad habit of doing once a week or so, I hopped over to my FB friend of a FB friend conspiracy theorist's page tonight to see what she is posting. It's usually mostly Covid stuff, but she dabbles in a lot of other conspiracies as well, of course, including election fraud nonsense.

I went down the rabbit hole a little and watched a couple of videos - wow! I hope it's OK to share a really short one, because the insanity is just amazing.

https://phibetaiota.net/2021/01/unri...ud-commission/

In just 3 minutes you learn that no president will be sworn in until April 1st...yes, April Fool's Day. Trump will be using the Emergency Broadcast System and forcing all networks to play his broadcast under threat of losing their FCC license, criminal action, and possibly a military takeover. JFK Jr. is alive, but NOT slated to be vice president. Wow, I didn't even know that was a thing, and it's already over. I need to keep up! Very educational 3 minutes.
This is Q stuff which is just utterly insane people writing fan fiction , what most of these p-nut gallery , throw a vote at anything with the color blue on it voters do is the EXACT opposite end of the spectrum of Q people. " trumps hitler/nazi/stalin / facist" " you have to vote biden or your a neo nazi" " plotting to take over america" its literally Q anon's liberal counterparts in a ******ed battle for larp supremacy.

do you think that everyone who voted for trump is Q anon ? if so i might have some bad news for you.....

i voted trump because his foreign policy and putting america first in a time that politicians sell us out at every opportunity . joe biden will start wars , your rights will be taken away ( free speech) ( 2nd amendment) ( general freedom) if you think they will let this power gained from the pandemic go you are sadly mistaken , if you think this wasnt orchestrated your naive , the left thinks they won with this presidency but it went against everything being liberal used to stand for. you cheered for censorship mark my words it will be used against blm and antifa ( commies) and basically anyone who tries to run a populist campaign again. tulsi gabbard was the best option the dnc had at winning a fair election and they baselessly called her a russian spy.... debbie shultz rigged the elections against bernie sanders , i know people who were active in the campaigning who have great stories about it , they also rigged the election against tim canova for debbie shultz after she had to resign from dnc chair


"On July 28, 2016, Wasserman Schultz resigned from her position after WikiLeaks released a collection of stolen emails indicating that Wasserman Schultz and other members of the DNC staff had favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primaries." ( this is treason btw the same thing that they told james comey he would be convicted with if he investigated hillaries emails and came up short in court , judges are bias ( need proof , look up court packing) hillary is the dnc she would not be convicted this is why comey didnt try to go after hillary)

see ive been paying attention this whole time while you all have been skimming headlines and when trumped claimed fraud it didnt even shock me in the slightest. anyone who whole heartedly thinks otherwise is what the dnc loves , the willfully ignorant.

Last edited by fishfood69er; 01-13-2021 at 10:44 PM.

      
m