Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Nit
Have the auditors clearly submitted there findings? A submitted report. OAN has made some claims but is there a report with these numbers submitted to say the state senate, when are they going to submit to a court?
Their, not there.
Not submitted yet as far as I know. It appears Mary Fanning is a key source for Lindells data packets theory.
Data packets contain:
Timestamp of the access
The IP address source
The incoming network source
The Computer ID source
Target ID (State level)
Target entry point (County level)
ID target (address of the target computer)
Method of intrusion (firewall breach or admin credentialed access)
Successful (intrusion)?
Log trace?
Votes changed?
You can see an example of the intrusion table in the first 4 minutes in
this video.
They claim to have thousands of pages of these records. Mostly from Chinese intrusions, but not exclusively, in 2995 counties in the US.
She says that cyber security experts "in the cyber security battle space" (so the intelligence community or military?) built the tools that recorded the election data in real time.
This all makes sense. I don't think it's a mystery to most people that the NSA is recording most internet traffic.
This was one of Edward Snowdens key reveals. This capability isn't news to me now, but it was at the time for sure...but may shock some people who think the US government isn't recording their internet activity, either directly or through the 5 eyes.
Heres the Intercept (Glenn Greenwalds old rag) talking about it.
Almost all internet traffic flowing over AT&Ts network (which carries traffic for most other networks) is recorded. VPN's don't work against the sophisticated tracing operations of the NSA btw, just incase you were wondering why Chinese hackers didn't use Virtual Shield
They layered a (very nice) GUI on top of the raw data which shows video of the flow of data packets starting at 8 minutes.
These data packet flows would be on the routers in Maricopa county. This is precisely what they are supposed to record.
The question Im asking is...Is this why the MCBOE is willing to risk jail time for contempt by not releasing the routers? Covering up a foreign intrusion comes with much stiffer penalties than contempt.
I'm not sure of the answer, but the question needs to be asked and they need to answer it.
Last edited by bingobazza; 07-19-2021 at 10:28 AM.