Sorry missed it here or elsewhere but why does Lindell need to wait until August for his big reveal? Why not get it out as quickly as possible?

I mean I know why but what is Lindell telling people as to the reason for the delay?

He released the video already where his cyber security guy presented the evidence. It got censored by Big Tech immediately (just like lab origins, Ivermectin "consipracy theories" initially got banned until they had to be walked back as more people woke up to the possibility of a different reality). I think these events take time to coordinate with these cyber security experts who are flying in from all over the world. It's happening in SD starting August 10th until the 12th.

...or could be a grift to milk Trump supporters. A lot of people who haven't even looked at the video are already convinced this is the reason. I have looked, so I'm holding off on judging until I see if these hackers can debunk his data.

In other news...

A tale of 2 crises

Hundreds of thousands pour across the Southern border with COVID during a near nationwide lockdown to prevent COVID

Kamala - I’ll take a run down near there in a few months for optics…keep it wide open

Republicans announce a forensic election audit in PA, then overrule the PA SoS and Attorney General who tried to usurp the Senates authority in what appears to be a panicked move

The Big Guys handlers:
#1 - Republicans aren’t falling for it. How soon can we get the big guy wheels up on AF1 to Philly to talk about protecting the sacred right to vote while we coordinate with the team on the ground to stop this audit?

Dr Jill - Tuesday

#1 - Joe, you’re getting another ride on AF1 and there’ll be ice cream!

The Big Guy:
Sweet

The Big Guys handlers:
#1 - Get me everybody at Perkins Coie

Kamala - Everybody?

#1 - EVERYYYYYYYBODDY.

—

PA is a State Trump won by 1.2% in 2016 and where new Republican voter registrations outnumbered new Democrat voter registrations by @3/1 since 2016, with virtually no population growth.

This is what panic mode looks like.

In other news, nobody is in a state of panic about whatever fantasy theory you are babbling on about, but you might want to present your latest Covid findings in this other thread found here (dedicated to that topic) where you may find more people who will give your ideas a chance. Read the thread some and give it a try!

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/3...virus-1763354/

Anyways, do you think Trump will be reinstated in August? Would you like to bet on whether Trump won in 2020?

All the best.

From post above I got some stats wrong. Red net new voter regs were 20x Blue in PA, not 3x. Trump won by 0.71% in 2016, not 1.2%.

Thats all.

Do you think anyone cares about your stats as you try to present them? Anyway, I linked you a thread where your approach and thinking will be a much better fit, so consider posting there and you may find the interactions you have in that thread are far more enjoyable for your posting experience in general.

All the best.

Did I just hear something squeak? Meh, must be nothing important.

Add GA to AZ and PA now. Forensic audit incoming.

Hard physical evidence of fraud (the only type that actually matters) has been found in GA. Fabricated vote totals. Fabricated. Let that sink in.

The VoterGA team found 7 falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals for their respective batches. For example, a batch containing 59 actual ballot images for Joe Biden, 42 for Donald Trump and 0 for Jo Jorgenson was reported as 100 for Biden and 0 for Trump. The seven batches of ballot images with 554 votes for Joe Biden, 140 votes for Donald Trump and 11 votes for Jo Jorgenson had tally sheets in the audit falsified to show 850 votes for Biden, 0 votes for Trump and 0 votes for Jorgenson.

Here is a PDF with the fabricated vote totals.

https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploa...lly-sheets.pdf

The big guy will be wheels down in AF1 in Philly shortly.

Containment thread? Breach imminent.

bingobazza,

What do you believe the true odds are that Trump will be POTUS on January 1, 2022?

So I guess bingo is no longer looking for help debunking claims someone sent him?

Correct. We have moved on from the "just asking questions" phase of the program.

At least he correctly assesses that his stuff is nothing important, so there is that.

This bingo guy is OK, I guess, but I still miss PlayBig2000.

Here is a video of the guy presenting the PDF and some other physical evidence goodies. https://rumble.com/vjsyl3-fulton-cou...e-ballots.html

AZ Senator says the audit totals in Maricopa don't match the election night certified totals. The exact quantity of the mismatch is unknown at this stage but will likely come out in about 10 days.

No idea and don't really care.

If you asked me what are the odds that physical evidence of systemic election fraud will be uncovered that will convince a majority of independents that there was cheating from somewhere that favoured the DNC...I'd say 100%...because they already believe it.

Seventy-one percent (71%) of Republican voters support forensic election audits like the one in Arizona, as do 38% of Democrats and 57% of voters not affiliated with either major party.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...lection_audits

Happy now?

LOL @ citing a Rasmussen Reports poll, especially on this topic.

One the one hand you complain about vote tallies & fraud.

On the other you quote poll data as evidence in an argument.

Highlighting isn't complaining

As a component used to compile my assessment of an outcomes probability isn't claiming evidentiary status about anything.

Thanks for playing.

Which part of that do you think was false?

This 2 minute video should educate those who don't understand the difference between a recount and an a forensic audit and the types of errors an audit catches which a recount misses.

Did you ask the people who made that video if they can help debunk things you heard about? Did you tell them about your silly fraud stuff you like to do? These things help give context to your manifestos that nobody reads or clicks. Thanks!

All the best.

Your not highlighting it, you are pushing it as an agenda. If its not complaining its something else.

You bolded 38%- so you did. You are using numbers for affect.

Did you analyse the sources of your data? Are you confident the 38% is right?

95% CI and +-3% error margin, they say. They're well regarded. Do you have any evidence they're wrong? If so, I'll listen, because they're a staple of the polling landscape.

Correct yourself then. Be accurate and I'll listen.

You're nobody? Finally, we agree.

Those are ways to express magnitudes of sampling error, not bias, as anyone who's taken an intro stats course could tell you.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

But hey, I'm sure your views on the complex legal and technical issues you've raised are well thought out and absolutely not a giant firestorm of confirmation bias. Can you work some stuff about chemtrails or Area 51 into your next one?