Not so shockingly, "maybe not" was served yet again.

Anyway, onto the next irrelevant Trumpderp "important date!"

All the best.

Dr Navarro has published the Immaculate Deception:

https://www.thethinkingconservative....ate-deception/

https://www.thethinkingconservative....12.15.20-1.pdf

You are correct about one thing Mr 70,000 postman...I did vote for Trump. It was the first vote I cast since voting for Mc Govern in 1972.

I hope the man who received the most legally cast votes in states/DC/CD's that totals 270 EV's is the new President 1/20 as I assume most of you also do.

Let's just say I am a little suspicious of the out come as listed currently.

Well, you should contact the kraken lady to get her back on the case to do everything she can to alleviate your suspicions, since after going 1-100 or so you still think your guy won for some reason. Not sure why a couple of people doing a meaningless song and dance for Trump for their own political reasons on the 6th will change anything for you.

On January 20th the person who got millions of more votes and got quite a few more electoral college votes will be sworn in as President. Trump will probably be in Florida that day, so be sure to follow his twitter feed and buy a new logo hat and dream of more "wait for it" dates that will never happen. As well, if you are still interested in betting that Trump will win let me know and I will point out a lot of areas where you can bet your beliefs.

All the best.

MOTO.... the tea leaves are pretty easy to read. The only "question" is whether the drooler got 43,000 more legally cast votes in WI,AZ and GA

This explains a lot.

Can you pinpoint the moment you turned into a Nixon etc guy or was it more of a gradual thing?

Do you think that 'suspicion' is in any way hinged to reality? Were you suspicious in all elections considering the types of issues (not fraud) that team Trump has presented in court are all just normal election problems that happened in smaller proportions this election, than any other?

I mean, his lawyers admit in court 'this is not about fraud' but then his spokespersons come out of court and yell 'FRAUD'. Does that not make you suspicious?

Does it make you suspicious that even before Trump first ran in 2016 he was already claiming that if he ran and lost it would have to be rigged and fraud and all thru the Republican Primaries he was claiming rigged and fraud?

Does the concept of 'crying wolf' have any resonance with you and impact who you might consider credible in that regard.

Ultimately I guess my question is 'are you not far more suspicious of the man crying fraud?'

He's not actually suspicious.

Not sure why you are now calling Trump a drooler. He is more a spitter, and no he did not get more votes there. They counted, re-counted, re-counted, certified etc.

I personally enjoy that you and other Trumpderps want to continue losing, so when I ask when someone like you when you will be satisfied with the results, I kind of hope the answer is never, because only then will you lose in perpetuity. You avoiding answering is acceptable as well, as that is essentially you saying never without the courage to actually say it.

Be sure to buy some of the new Trump merch when it is available, as a big part of your role is to allow Trump to drain you of your funds.

All the best.

I'm very suspicious of Florida and Ohio too, not to mention Iowa and Texas. Trump was polling behind Biden consistently and somehow because of a bunch of ballots they 'found' in each of those states managed to eek out a win. Total travesty and these results should 100% be challenged!

Texas didn't even follow their own election laws, just like Wisconsin, and the same thing happened in Missouri. Total garbage in state after state and it's likely that Biden won over 400 EC seats. Stop the steal!

**** your censorship, learn facts:

https://hereistheevidence.com/

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/

https://www.revolver.news/

https://populist.press/

https://thenationalpulse.com/

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

https://votefraud.news/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-voter-fraud

https://pandemic.warroom.org/

https://thetentacle.com/2020/12/amis...nce-and-fraud/

https://got-freedom.org/wp-content/u...ace-121420.pdf

https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-conten...12.15.20-1.pdf

https://wethepeopleconvention.org/ar...mpilation-Page

https://wpcdn.zenger.news/wp-content...ENGER-NEWS.pdf

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....act_id=3756988

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...g-excess-votes

https://thedailycoin.org/2020/12/31/...n-fraud-video/

overwhelming fraud that continues to be censored by the technocrats attempting a coup...liberals brainwashed from five years of cnn/msdnc/wapo opinions lulz

RIP ameriKa

The most tempting of those links is bannonswarroom.com.

Knowing that people like that were often the ones I was on the other side of on the betting sites the past year makes winning that much more enjoyable. Shame he got banned as I enjoy their whining as the equivalent of a dessert. 2+2 is quickly running out of Trumpderp entertainment!

i love that the go to "smart conservative" argument is to now try and do a "study" that shows that mail in voting was lower than usual for Trump so this must be fraud, fully ignoring the fact that trump screamed to everyone constantly for four months that voting by mail wasn't safe and that your vote would be stolen, and his sycophants actually listened to him..

Learn, sheep

Do you live in a state that reinstated a felon’s right to vote or did you get drawn into the racist agenda pushed by Trump?

Bolded is complete and utter fantasy. Are you under the impression that, but for the riots, the House would have voted in support of Cruz's objection and his proposed remedy of an audit? That was never going to happen. No chance at all.

i think they would have had to if they ever wanted legitamacy. the polls showed a good portion of americans did non believe this election was fair including myself. obv.

another thing is if trumps claims were so easy to deny then WHY not own him in court. it does not add up.

I'd love to know what evidence you have in support of this harebrained theory.

sworn affidavits that never had there day in court ( the truck driver who under penalty of purgery said he drove a semi truck of ballots from ny or pa ), these needed to be said under oath in court. people came out and put there freedom on the line. statistical anomalys especially matt brainards and the voter integrity fund , Allegheny County had 100k more votes than voters ( from memory could be off) , dominion never got audited , as gamblers you all know that every anomaly coming up in joes favor is rediculous...... youd play in that poker game lol? obv. not. theres more too i mean this is off the top of my head.

and my spelling is really bad but im not fixing it. lol

I don't know what to say to this. It's simply a delusion. Regardless of whether you thought the House members stood to lose legitimacy, there was never even a .01% chance that the House was going to vote in the way you imagine.

What in the world are you talking about? He got owned in court approximately five dozen times.

You're just full of ****.

see this is media dis info , 60 some cases were not trumps the were other cases in his favor. he had 3 with juliani and then there was the state of texas case which all never saw the light of day in court , they were dismissed on standing. basically saying they didnt have the right to sue.

googles your friend and if not them duckduckgo

also responding to 6 different people is exhausting you can look all this **** up yourselves if you dont REEEEEEE everytime you start to read something that challenges your thinking.