Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Riggie containment thread Riggie containment thread

11-19-2020 , 01:49 PM
all this evidence of election fraud is absolutely overwhelming and the associated state legislatures will be left with no choice but to throw this election into the House of Congress. check back in january...
11-19-2020 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleriver
all this evidence of election fraud is absolutely overwhelming and the associated state legislatures will be left with no choice but to throw this election into the House of Congress. check back in january...


Story checks out.
11-19-2020 , 01:53 PM
overwhelming is any number greater than 0.000000000001% is it?
11-19-2020 , 02:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleriver
all this evidence of election fraud is absolutely overwhelming and the associated state legislatures will be left with no choice but to throw this election into the House of Congress. check back in january...
Would you please post a single piece of evidence?
12-04-2020 , 08:29 AM
Bobo, a sad day for democracy (or a Democratic Republic since we’re not a democracy) is allowing the constitution to be trampled on and massive fraud to decide the president. Also, keep in mind the beloved Obama won his first race getting 3 people kicked off of the ballot in 1996 for fraudulent signatures, so spare me.
12-04-2020 , 08:55 AM
The dominion stuff is very real but it will take far too long to change the election.
12-04-2020 , 09:03 AM
Rigged election posts goes here. Cite or ban can very much apply.

Last edited by tame_deuces; 12-09-2020 at 06:07 PM.
12-04-2020 , 09:08 AM
A cite or ban condition really hinders the creativity of riggies. They do not exist to prove anything, rather they exist to entertain others with their wild and silly beliefs, so I suggest that a riggie containment thread should have a looser approach for the citation requirements for riggie wacky whatevers.
12-04-2020 , 09:10 AM
Filing bogus lawsuits isn't an indication of wrong doing.

But Trump has been doing this his whole life, so it is what it is.
12-04-2020 , 09:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneShotToLive
The dominion stuff is very real but it will take far too long to change the election.
The Dominion stuff is very real. The real paper ballots that provide the basis for a hand recount that matched the voting machines count. WTF is wrong with people that can't do a 10 second google search?
12-04-2020 , 10:22 AM
I actually interviewed with Dominion several years ago. I don't remember exactly, but I think it was like 2012 or 2013, definitely before the 2016 election. I asked them about security figuring that was probably a key requirement for them, and the lady looked at me like I had 2 heads. Security wasn't even a consideration for them. They struck me as kind of a garage shop that made some pretty simple and boring products. At least that was how they seemed to roll in their Denver office. It was a long time ago and the company may have evolved since then but I doubt they are this group of evil masterminds pulling off insane conspiracies to swing US presidential elections.
12-04-2020 , 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
...... but I doubt they are this group of evil masterminds pulling off insane conspiracies to swing US presidential elections.
.....whilst leaving the Congressional votes to swing in the wind, unaided.
12-09-2020 , 10:08 AM
It's pretty clear Trump won the election.

You people can't even stop talking about him, even though Biden is "President Elect"

This thread is still many magnitudes more popular than Biden's thread, and will continue to be so through Trump's 2nd term starting Jan 21, 2021

Boy, you people are entertaining. Thank you for that
12-09-2020 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zplusz
It's pretty clear Trump won the election.

You people can't even stop talking about him, even though Biden is "President Elect"

This thread is still many magnitudes more popular than Biden's thread, and will continue to be so through Trump's 2nd term starting Jan 21, 2021

Boy, you people are entertaining. Thank you for that
Edgy...
12-09-2020 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zplusz
It's pretty clear Trump won the election.

You people can't even stop talking about him, even though Biden is "President Elect"

This thread is still many magnitudes more popular than Biden's thread, and will continue to be so through Trump's 2nd term starting Jan 21, 2021

Boy, you people are entertaining. Thank you for that
Ya shock that someone in courts currently trying to overturn an election and screaming on tv constantly 'theft' is getting more news compared to someone who believes gov't is not a reality tv show seeking ratings and should be boring administrative work on behalf of the people. Big shock.

Trumptard idiots think the 3 ring circus Trump runs with stadiums full of sheepish fans is proof he is POTUS and won.

They have no understanding of history and what the 'bread not circuses' statement meant at it heart as they rush into the stands at the expense of their own safety, and think all that matters is the 'show'.
12-16-2020 , 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shifty86
Convicted of what?

There are thousands of signed affidavits of people saying they witnessed fraud. Whether they just saw what they thought was fraud but actually wasn't, are lying or actually saw fraud what is the harm in investigating it? If you care about democracy you should want fair election. If you are a democrat you get to laugh at republicans for wasting time and resources on a phony investigation. If there was no fraud I don't get why democrats don't want republicans to run with the "election was stolen" narrative.
^ this sums it up. If you believe an election cannot be cheated then you're naive. It's 2020, it's possible , anything is possible. What's more concerning is a lot of people who vote Democrat seem to think its stupid or silly to believe this. What if it was the other way around, those same democrats would be very upset. That said we should all want a fair election, so if there is proof or anomalies happening you would think most people would prefer to see the end result no, or is it ok because your pick won. It's a slippery slope of no coming back if you think it's ok that Trump was cheated because he is out of office(I say this if the end result showed this)

They are all politicians at the end of the day. Both sides will tell you what you want to hear.
12-16-2020 , 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baitperformance
^ this sums it up. If you believe an election cannot be cheated then you're naive.
Of course it can be. But that's a very, very different claim than claiming this election was "cheated", which is of course something only idiots believe.
12-17-2020 , 07:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baitperformance
^ this sums it up. If you believe an election cannot be cheated then you're naive. It's 2020, it's possible , anything is possible. What's more concerning is a lot of people who vote Democrat seem to think its stupid or silly to believe this. What if it was the other way around, those same democrats would be very upset. That said we should all want a fair election, so if there is proof or anomalies happening you would think most people would prefer to see the end result no, or is it ok because your pick won. It's a slippery slope of no coming back if you think it's ok that Trump was cheated because he is out of office(I say this if the end result showed this)

They are all politicians at the end of the day. Both sides will tell you what you want to hear.

Where is proof that anomalies occurred ?

So far the courts have thrown every suit out, which means so far there is no proof.

Why are you conflating lack of proof with a double standard you claim is held by democrats ?
12-17-2020 , 08:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baitperformance
It's 2020, it's possible , anything is possible.
I look forward to you and others finally pushing the Lizard People case here and elsewhere in a proper "anything is possible" manner. Remember to ask others to prove that everything is not possible to support your beliefs, as that is a powerful debating tool. Drop the kraken and go lizard!

All the best.
12-17-2020 , 12:05 PM
Since this tread is actually supposed to be about "was the election stolen" and not tiki torches and statues for you reading pleasure/education I present:

https://www.scribd.com/document/4884...ort#from_embed
12-17-2020 , 12:08 PM
No, that's not what this thread is about. You're looking for the riggie thread. That is where your farcical bullshit link belongs.
12-23-2020 , 09:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monteroy
What else do you expect of the legal process at this point? Kraken and friends are about 1-60+ with the 1 "win" being something like a person can stand a foot closer somewhere.

Also, you probably need to explain your personal belief of what a legally counted vote is and what is not one.


All the best.
The legal process need to be run through its conclusion. Dec. 23 is an interesting date. Maybe by this afternoon your hair will be on fire.... maybe not.

I'll give you one example of a "legal" vote that isn't. In federal elections only US Citizens are allowed to vote. In Nevada anyone who receives a Nevada driver's licence is automatically registered to vote. Non citizen holders of valid driver's licenses may choose to vote if they do not fear retribution from the government. 6,136 non-citizens are currently on the active voter rolls in Nevada and 3,987 actually voted in this cycle. That is voter fraud.
12-23-2020 , 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monteroy
Well, December 23 will come and go just as every other "just wait and see" date has come and gone for those trying to pitch what you fantasize will happen. What will be the date after that that will be your next hair fire date?

How about this? When Biden is actually sworn in on January 20th - will you accept he won the race fair and square at that time? You can save everyone time and say you will never accept it, and that way you can be put in the same category of people who predict the end of the world in a specific year and then simply change the year forward when their prediction does not come true. You can do that for as long as you like, isn't that fun!

Side question - do you think Trump should declare martial law and do that insurrection act thing? Thanks!

All the best.
You ask me a question about illegal votes and the when I present>3,000 obviously illegal votes in a prima facie case I get "crickets" from you?

Do you want to engage in a discussion or have "gotcha" moments?

As someone who made 90% of his money gambling through my entire life Biden is a very strong favorite to be President on 1/20 at noon.

Whether he legally won NV, WI, PA, MI, GA or AZ may go down in history as a question like did Kennedy actually win Illinois/Tx/Hawaii in 1960.

However it falls I will certainly acknowledge the winner as the of the legal process, because unlike many of you i believe in process and without it we have anarchy. I am unlike the universe, I abhor disorder. But I respect freedom more than I abhor disorder.

The insurrection act should only be invoked in the presence of an actual insurrection:

Used to enforce Federal laws on recalcitrant juris dictions

Used to quell riots such as in LA in 1992.

I don't see any rational reason for the strawman insurrection act excepting an unfounded/illegal insurrection. If the President follows the law and for some reason there is an insurrection he has the duty to deal with it.

If in your fantasy he supersedes the process illegally, I'll be on the top of the ramparts with my pitchfork and rifle to get him out.
12-23-2020 , 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711



I'll give you one example of a "legal" vote that isn't. In federal elections only US Citizens are allowed to vote. In Nevada anyone who receives a Nevada driver's licence is automatically registered to vote. Non citizen holders of valid driver's licenses may choose to vote if they do not fear retribution from the government. 6,136 non-citizens are currently on the active voter rolls in Nevada and 3,987 actually voted in this cycle. That is voter fraud.

Quote:
It also addresses additional unfounded claims by Trump — who yesterday tweeted that “many thousands of noncitizens voted in Nevada” — in stating that the office has not been presented with any evidence of non-citizens voting in the 2020 election as of Friday.

That claim originates from a declaration submitted by the Trump campaign as part of an ultimately unsuccessful election contest lawsuit, which claimed it had evidence that 3,987 noncitizens voted in the 2020 election through comparing of voter rolls with subpoenaed documents from the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles of individuals with driver authorization cards, which are offered to noncitizens as a way to legally drive on state roads.

A DMV spokesman said in an email on Thursday evening that it provided the Trump campaign with a list of the names and addresses of individuals who over the last five years had obtained a driver authorization card or driver’s license using immigration paperwork, such as a permanent resident card, U.S. Visa or other immigration related documents. But the office said that the list was not definitive proof of citizenship or noncitizenship, as individuals could obtain citizenship and legally vote after obtaining a driver authorization card.

“The mere fact that a person presented such a document when applying at the DMV is not conclusive proof of their citizenship status,” DMV spokesman Kevin Malone said in an email. “These residents may well have gained citizenship but have not updated their driver’s license or ID.”

Michael Kagan, Director of the UNLV Immigration Clinic, said that the categories of immigration documents requested by the Trump campaign were documents that could have been used by individuals eligible to become U.S. citizens.

“Immigration status and citizenship change during people's lives, and driver's licenses last many years,” he said in a message. “Someone might have been a non-citizen three years ago when they got their driver's license, and they then got citizenship, voted legally, and haven't renewed their license with a new document yet.”
https://thenevadaindependent.com/art...-2020-election
12-23-2020 , 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
You ask me a question about illegal votes and the when I present>3,000 obviously illegal votes in a prima facie case I get "crickets" from you?
Yeah, because you are hardly one who should be taken seriously and if I said - ok, toss in those 3,000 votes - no difference all you will do is yammer on about 50 more nonsense things.

Guess I would ask - why is the Kraken team not winning any of their cases if the evidence is as slam dunk as you think?


Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
As someone who made 90% of his money gambling through my entire life Biden is a very strong favorite to be President on 1/20 at noon.
Well, getting harder to find Trumpderps who will still bet on Trump, but there are still a few ways they can, and I encourage you to continue betting on Trump. You should also read the article that goofy linked here about how much the sports books were laughing directly at Trumpderps for continuing to bet on a known result the wrong way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
Whether he legally won NV, WI, PA, MI, GA or AZ may go down in history as a question like did Kennedy actually win Illinois/Tx/Hawaii in 1960.
See, all you had to say was that you will never accept a Biden win. Stop trying to pawn it off on "others." These are your beliefs . Yes or no, when Biden is sworn in on January 20th, will you accept that he won fairly? Yes or no. Simple one word answer will do, and I say that knowing you cannot actually do it of course!.



Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
However it falls I will certainly acknowledge the winner as the of the legal process, because unlike many of you i believe in process and without it we have anarchy. I am unlike the universe, I abhor disorder. But I respect freedom more than I abhor disorder.
What is still being done as the "legal process" in your mind. Your kraken lost over and over. Pretty much no more cases are being filed. Why don't you simply say "it will never end" to allow you to believe what you need to believe forever. You can even get a T-Shirt with "Wait for It!" as a logo. Get a few so you have spares when the first one wears out before the "it" happens.


Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
The insurrection act should only be invoked in the presence of an actual insurrection:

Used to enforce Federal laws on recalcitrant juris dictions

Used to quell riots such as in LA in 1992.

I don't see any rational reason for the strawman insurrection act excepting an unfounded/illegal insurrection. If the President follows the law and for some reason there is an insurrection he has the duty to deal with it.

If in your fantasy he supersedes the process illegally, I'll be on the top of the ramparts with my pitchfork and rifle to get him out.
You did not answer the simple yes or no question. Do you think Trump should use this right here and right now? Yes or no? Come on, don't be afraid to answer the question. Thanks!

All the best.

P.S. You also never said what the next hair on fire day will be when today (the 23rd) sets no hair on fire. What is that date? Thanks again!

      
m