Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
You ask me a question about illegal votes and the when I present>3,000 obviously illegal votes in a prima facie case I get "crickets" from you?
Yeah, because you are hardly one who should be taken seriously and if I said - ok, toss in those 3,000 votes - no difference all you will do is yammer on about 50 more nonsense things.
Guess I would ask - why is the Kraken team not winning any of their cases if the evidence is as slam dunk as you think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
As someone who made 90% of his money gambling through my entire life Biden is a very strong favorite to be President on 1/20 at noon.
Well, getting harder to find Trumpderps who will still bet on Trump, but there are still a few ways they can, and I encourage you to continue betting on Trump. You should also read the article that goofy linked here about how much the sports books were laughing directly at Trumpderps for continuing to bet on a known result the wrong way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
Whether he legally won NV, WI, PA, MI, GA or AZ may go down in history as a question like did Kennedy actually win Illinois/Tx/Hawaii in 1960.
See, all you had to say was that you will never accept a Biden win. Stop trying to pawn it off on "others." These are your beliefs
. Yes or no, when Biden is sworn in on January 20th, will you accept that he won fairly? Yes or no. Simple one word answer will do, and I say that knowing you cannot actually do it of course!.
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
However it falls I will certainly acknowledge the winner as the of the legal process, because unlike many of you i believe in process and without it we have anarchy. I am unlike the universe, I abhor disorder. But I respect freedom more than I abhor disorder.
What is still being done as the "legal process" in your mind. Your kraken lost over and over. Pretty much no more cases are being filed. Why don't you simply say "it will never end" to allow you to believe what you need to believe forever. You can even get a T-Shirt with "Wait for It!" as a logo. Get a few so you have spares when the first one wears out before the "it" happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by np1235711
The insurrection act should only be invoked in the presence of an actual insurrection:
Used to enforce Federal laws on recalcitrant juris dictions
Used to quell riots such as in LA in 1992.
I don't see any rational reason for the strawman insurrection act excepting an unfounded/illegal insurrection. If the President follows the law and for some reason there is an insurrection he has the duty to deal with it.
If in your fantasy he supersedes the process illegally, I'll be on the top of the ramparts with my pitchfork and rifle to get him out.
You did not answer the simple yes or no question. Do you think Trump should use this right here and right now? Yes or no? Come on, don't be afraid to answer the question. Thanks!
All the best.
P.S. You also never said what the next hair on fire day will be when today (the 23rd) sets no hair on fire. What is that date? Thanks again!