Such as ?

A GOP court would accept that as precedent.

I think that was his list. "Statistical anomalies" like "Democrats are being harangued on foreign trips by people who believe they stole the election" and "F**k Biden signs and Trump Won signs are popping up like dandelions after a spring rain", although he seems to lack much in the coherency department, so hard to be sure.

Yeah, I was wondering if that was the list.
I think Nick sent his dad to school us.

Except for these explanations from Stanford scholars:

— Joe Biden won more votes than Trump even though he carried far fewer counties. (A meaningless statistic. Biden cleaned up in big cities while Trump carried more rural areas and, thus, more counties.)

— Trump won more bellwether counties. (Another meaningless statistic. Bellwethers reflect past performance and don’t determine election outcomes.)

— There was a big difference between votes that were counted early and those that were counted late. (That doesn’t indicate fraud. Republicans were more likely to vote on election day and more Democrats mailed in their ballots. So they were tabulated at different times.)

— Differences between voting patterns in 2016 and 2020 suggest voting irregularities. (Election results aren’t stamped out on an assembly line. Things invariably change from one campaign to the next.)


The political scholars then move onto “facts” that aren’t really facts at all.

— More votes were cast in 2020 than there are voters. (It didn’t happen. That falsehood grew out of a faulty analysis that took the turnout rate for eligible voters — those 18 and older — and applied it to the smaller number of registered voters.)

— Machines run by Dominion Voting Systems switched votes from Trump to Biden. (A statistical analysis shows no significant difference in Biden’s performance in counties using Dominion machines compared to those using other means to tabulate their ballots. The software and voting machine company has sued the right-wing propaganda networks Newsmax and One America News, among others, for defamation for widely promoting the misinformation.)

The claims keeps focus apart from some very inconvenient issues:

1. The fact that a mob that mixed right-wing extremist elements and "conservatives" pushed into congress as a democratic election was being formally declared, many of them straight from a rally held by the then sitting US president and his circle.
2. That the then sitting US president when asked in September 2020 refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power.
3. That the then sitting US president has made a habit of claims of election fraud.
4. That the then sitting US president made several calls and used the power of the office and his political power in what seems to be a clear case of pressure against state election officials to subvert the election process.
5. That the sitting US president gave his personal attorney the means to use US diplomatic power to demand that a foreign power (Ukraine) damage his opponent politically prior to an incoming election.

The above points to a critical rot in both government apparatus and political apparatus. In my personal opinion that US can not and should not afford to merely assume that "better people" will be elected. Better people means squat if there is no system to weed out rotten behavior.

Unfortunately the process to process to investigate this and rectify this would likely mean the ends of many careers and cause significant upheaval, it would be anything but pretty. I'm not one to suspect "active conspiracies", but I'm sure there are a lot of people who are just happy with this current and raging debate on nonsense issues.

Is there any word that riggies love to throw around more that "forensic?"

It's almost as if they believe that anything they themselves.describe as forensic must be accpeted as legitimate and scientific. Why aren't we taking this audit seriously? For ****'s sake, they told us the audit was "forensic."

Reminds me of how apparently nobody ever lies if whatever they said is "under penalty of felony".

Help this old guy with you kids and your internet speech.

FMP?

Urban dictionary says "F*ck me Pumps" or "F*ck me Please". Which of those did you mean?

(I am hoping the former FWIW) (see how I can adapt too?)

I just meant it as FYP but I was fixing my own post. Sorry to disappoint.

Is it really too much to ask for an update on when the next date the Pope will be arrested? The latest Qderps are such slackers.

Yeah, but a paragraph above claims Friday too! Should be an exciting weekend!

I love this point as this is something that also went Trump's way.

It totally went his way in 2016 were many were calling it for Hillary early but Trump just slowly kept coming back as the later votes were counted.

Trumpster were literally demanding the "Keep the Count Going" in AZ as the late votes were tilting towards Trump and they were hoping for a comeback.

I think it was Ohio and Texas that both looked very competitive for Biden early before later votes pushed it to Trump.

Why do Trumpsters not consider those fraud? Why is a State swinging late OK if for Trump but fraud if for Biden?

Dammit I have to learn TikTok speech now?

What does "For your Page" mean in this context?

You trolling bro? It means "fixed your post" when you quote someone but change the contents of the quoted text, usually for ironic or humorous value. Kind of like "I think this is what you really meant to say".

If it is either of those, please take it to PM guys.

No, no trolling. I almost always have to quick google the internet short forms. I do actually know the 'fixed that for you' (FTFY) now that you remind me, but am not as familiar with it as FYP and the google top hits say it is TikTok speak, so I think they are taking it over. Anyway disappointed it was not about the Pumps.

That's all they really want
Some fun
When the working day is done
Oh, mods, they wanna have fun
Oh, mods just wanna have fun

Pretty sure I first saw it myself on these 'ere forums, but it was easily over 10 years ago, way before the TikTok was a thing.

It's a euphemism for masturbation.

He's 'fixing his own post'.

Dirty bugger.

You yanking my chain?

Just imagine a Tuff Fish Tik Tok

FYP

Ya ever wonder why all the post-election court appearances to overthrow the results failed? Logic is the word that comes to mind

(mind you, I could have quoted the entire bb post but chose to only include these three gems)

Yes....I mean....no, ilk.

get a room....

Back on topic and adding to the above...


THE EMMYS

In September 2012, Trump, in a Twitter tirade, claimed that the Emmys were rigged, after his reality TV show "The Apprentice" failed to win any awards.

The Emmys are all politics, that's why, despite nominations, The Apprentice never won--even though it should have many times over.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 24, 2012
"Amazing Race" winning an Emmy again is a total joke. The Emmys have no credibility--no wonder the ratings are at record lows.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 24, 2012
"The Emmys are all politics, that's why, despite nominations, The Apprentice never won-- even though it should have many times over," he tweeted.

"'Amazing Race' winning an Emmy again is a total joke. The Emmys have no credibility--no wonder the ratings are at record lows."