Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
So how many mods are being proposed here to take over? I'm just wondering if there will be strong enough unity amongst them in terms of a moderating style to give a clear enough direction on what is allowed and not allowed moving into the post Well named politics moderation. I say this as you have generally seen consistent moderating because it is the one person pulling the strings and we get used to a moderating style (a very effective one at that it has been) but if you have several you may tend to lose sight of what you should be doing. Any ideas from the new mod team about how that is to be addressed? Would you for example seek feedback from Well named in a month or two's time about what could be improved?
I honestly don't understand takes like this, suggesting we had a consistently moderated forum here. I think even WN would admit he got pretty exhausted from moderating it and basically gave up on moderating personal attacks or attempts to separate good-faith from bad-faith posting. Does anyone think the rules written in the
forum sticky resemble the forum that this place is now, compared to a year ago?
Are you advocating for the current P&S forum, or for the forum with rules described in that link? Because they definitely aren't the same thing. I'm also curious what the new moderators think, but it generally sounds like they're not that into the written rules either.