[QUOTE=jjjou812;57295430] I certainly don't care what a group of pedestrians have to say.

Rococo, good catch but fix your post because it was my error not lagtight.

This actually is surprising fwiw. There is certainly no reason to assume it based on it the name alone and every reason to assume that they're just a standard professional group-- but I see that they are a distinct group from the American Academy of Pediatricians.

Also interesting is that American Acedemy of Pediatricians has 67,000 members and The American College of Pediatricians has only 500 members (only half of which are pedestrians).

I agree with this. But I think that there more diabolical reasons behind the whole right to life movement. I think it's also a way to keep minorities and poor people in general poor. They prevent people from getting an abortion but provide absolutely no assistance to those people. Young mothers are forced to stay home and care for the child, all the meanwhile they can't go out and get a job or to school because they're home taking care of a baby.
And poverty is also a form of segregation. Poor people are forced to live in poor neighborhoods.

This doesn’t make sense when those same churches are providing food, assistance with housing and job placement in their local communities

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2roWLzrqOjQ

I understand your scepticism. It's totally natural. And I don't accuse conservatives solely for these issues. What is explained in this video was a widespread general policy across the political spectrum. Watch it until the end to get the whole picture. It's not that long.
Knowledge is power they say but maybe sometimes it's easier to know less. But once you learn some things, and there's so much we don't know, you can't be the same.

If we're lucky maybe we'll have some of our pragerU grads pop in for some analysis.

It's funny to see Republicans complain about Taliban taking over Afghanistan when they are going full Taliban themselves in Texas.

Funny how King Spew understood right away and you still can’t seem to figure it out. Says a lot about you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That video is about racist fha policy from the 50s/60s. Your contention is modern day churches are trying to keep POC poor but there are churches giving POC asylum and money; for example:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dis...emplate=ampart

My view on Christianity (from an atheist perspective) is there are those who take bible seriously and try and follow parts of it that mean most to them and those who identify as Christian but in practice don’t do anything serious to help others. It’s not hard to take the true believers at face value when they say they believe the unborn have souls. I don’t have to agree with them to understand that perspective.

I was probably a bit flippant in commenting how obvious it can be.

This is sadly a common tactic in the US, as I have found when looking for statistics and articles; lobbying groups or advocacy groups often adopt neutral sounding names, or names that are easy to confuse with existing and recognized organizations. The publications can then vary in quality from outright fabrication to using a lot of half-truths.

It is not limited to one side of the political spectrum. It is not unique to the US, but I will say that it is particularly prevalent there. I have found that in recent years it has actually become harder and harder to find neutral data or to verify that articles or data is good.

My tip is generally to check out the general website on any article, and do some basic research on the group that publishes it. That doesn't automatically imply that people should disagree with the piece, but I'd say as a general rule of thumb that groups that try to misrepresent what they are should be taken with a grain of salt.

How do ‘birthing people’ and ‘men with uteruses’ feel about this?

This is about as true as the "news" in America gets. It's not really news: it's political propaganda.

The party of science:

What is that outfit? Their mainpage is asking for donations immediately

Looks like some refuge for parents of kids who didn't make the cut for gate--but were still Certain their little squirts were special--so it's off to the strip mall school

[QUOTE=jjjou812;57295430] My current position is that abortion is wrong at least 99.9999% of the time.

Yay Texas!!!

I Science!

As expected lagtight is unable to answer a direct question.

I won't answer questions that commit the Complex Question Fallacy. DUCY?

Laggy?

+1

From Gotquestions.org:

https://www.gotquestions.org/abortion-Bible.html


The Bible never specifically addresses the issue of abortion. However, there are numerous teachings in Scripture that make it abundantly clear what God’s view of abortion is. Jeremiah 1:5 tells us that God knows us before He forms us in the womb. Psalm 139:13-16 speaks of God’s active role in our creation and formation in the womb. Exodus 21:22-25 prescribes the same penalty—death—for someone who causes the death of a baby in the womb as for someone who commits murder. This clearly indicates that God considers a baby in the womb to be just as much of a human being as a full-grown adult. For the Christian, abortion is not a matter of a woman’s right to choose. It is a matter of the life or death of a human being made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-27; 9:6).

Nothing wrong taking the 5th …..