Quote:
Originally Posted by checkraisdraw
I’m just imagining this proverbial woman that gets an abortion in the third trimester for any reason except health of herself or the fetus.
But I imagine the best way to reduce third trimester abortions is to make prenatal care and abortions available as early on in the pregnancy as possible, as well as to offer more contraceptives, plan b, sex education, family planning services, and pregnancy tests. Just like they do in Europe
If the bold doesn't happen, then why are people against banning it as a legal possibility lol.
Why does Oregon allow for it, given they have contraceptives, plan b, sex education, easy abortion first trimester (and second...) and so on.
this is identical to the "surgery to minors with gender disphoria". If it never happens why are you against making it explicitly illegal.
If it happens, why do you deny it does?
It's simply indefensible to argue like that.
You understand that people in favour of no question asked abortion till birth actually claim that until birth the fetus has 0 rights ok? and the woman should be able to decide with 0 consideration for the fetus itself.
Defend that claim which is the claim used lol, if you can (not even roe defended that nonsense), not the "ehhh it doesn't happen anyway it's a strawman"