So here is a video of Pierre talking about the high cost of housing. This is were Uke is critical of Pierre as he does not tell us how he will do it
So yes I think he is lying here. I am just so glad that Justin Trudeau has never promised to deliver on affordable housing for years and years with no plan or even promise to build 1.4 million affordable houses with no plan .
Lets also not forget the cost of Property Taxes on owning a home
Um, housing is one of the things Pierre HAS offered a number of solutions on. It isn't like the things he ducks and dodges and refuses to answer. Sure, his plan is incompetently bad and won't accomplish much of anything (and is pretty far from conservative values) but at least it is an articulable plan.
Um, housing is one of the things Pierre HAS offered a number of solutions on. It isn't like the things he ducks and dodges and refuses to answer. Sure, his plan is incompetently bad and won't accomplish much of anything (and is pretty far from conservative values) but at least it is an articulable plan.
You do realize that whole post was total sarcasm as Justin had no plan Now his response is from his Deputy PM Its hard and his reply is not a federal priority
Though I do agree Pierre's Plan will not work either.
Um, trudeau has also done quite a bit on the housing front. There are obviously extremely significant macroeconomic forces at play here and no government is going to be able to magically make those pressures go away. But there are important distinctions between policies that are implimented nonetheless. You don't seem at all interested in what housing policies trudeau has or has not implimented, whether poilievre has or has not proposed similar or different policies, it seems you are only here for "housing expensive blame trudeau" games.
Um, trudeau has also done quite a bit on the housing front. There are obviously extremely significant macroeconomic forces at play here and no government is going to be able to magically make those pressures go away. But there are important distinctions between policies that are implimented nonetheless. You don't seem at all interested in what housing policies trudeau has or has not implimented, whether poilievre has or has not proposed similar or different policies, it seems you are only here for "housing expensive blame trudeau" games.
Sad.
Please tell me the policies that have had a significant or any impact on making housing more affordable in Canada by JT.
Great to see The Toronto Mayor's new priorities are renaming Dundas Street . Good Luck Toronto your gonna go broke to be woke
Sure. There is quite a long suite of policies in this portfolio. I'd probably start with the 10-year 82 billion dollar national housing strategy launched in 2017, and it contains all sorts of stuff like the national housing co-investment fund, rapid housing initative, canada housing benefit, community housing initiative, first time home buyer programs, etc. Part of the issue is that there is an important distinction between how people use "affordable housing", as in I think you are primarily thinking about something like the average cost of a single family home in major markets, or something of this sort, but a lot of policies on "affordable housing" are transferring billions into supporting the creation of below-market stuff, things that you would probably never be related to. The latest thing brought on that many will have heard of was the first time home buyer's incentive which some of my younger contemporaries are taking advantage of.
It's actually quite non-trivial to evaluate a lot of these initiatives on their own, but you can really get down into the weeds on them if you care. Basically the way I would think about it is that no, the liberals haven't magically erased the major macro trends, but they have done a lot of important work particularly for lower-income housing that is very laudible even if proven insufficient in the face of those macro trends.
Sure. There is quite a long suite of policies in this portfolio. I'd probably start with the 10-year 82 billion dollar national housing strategy launched in 2017, and it contains all sorts of stuff like the national housing co-investment fund, rapid housing initative, canada housing benefit, community housing initiative, first time home buyer programs, etc. Part of the issue is that there is an important distinction between how people use "affordable housing", as in I think you are primarily thinking about something like the average cost of a single family home in major markets, or something of this sort, but a lot of policies on "affordable housing" are transferring billions into supporting the creation of below-market stuff, things that you would probably never be related to. The latest thing brought on that many will have heard of was the first time home buyer's incentive which some of my younger contemporaries are taking advantage of.
It's actually quite non-trivial to evaluate a lot of these initiatives on their own, but you can really get down into the weeds on them if you care. Basically the way I would think about it is that no, the liberals haven't magically erased the major macro trends, but they have done a lot of important work particularly for lower-income housing that is very laudible even if proven insufficient in the face of those macro trends.
Housing just will not get more affordable under PP, because what actually needs to be done to achieve that is totally counter the conservative way of doing things.
Yes reducing red tape is going to help some. But it won't make up for the fact that in the end, corporations are just going to make a bigger boatload on housing, and the individual will not get cheaper housing, full stop. Doug Ford destroyed renters in Ontario, and people are crying Trudeau. It's amazing. The "well you voted Trudeau" on the Ontario housing crisis is one of my favorite responses. But like I said before, in 2029 we'll see what PP got done in housing. I'd bet anything on it getting worse.
Covid killing at 5% was the only realistic out. Thankfully it didn't come to be. But THAT would have done it.
You keep bolding opinion piece as if it is snark because I kept mentioning that when you presented opinion pieces as news when it was not news (because it is not). If it bothers you that much then just present your junk as news again, it is not like any other poster cares about it or gives your stuff any value, so go with whatever makes you happier in the end. Present your own little opinions as news if you prefer, though you have few as you opt to just regurgitate the alt-right content you consume. Not sure if you are aware of your role, but those that create content for you definitely know your role.
You keep bolding opinion piece as if it is snark because I kept mentioning that when you presented opinion pieces as news when it was not news (because it is not). If it bothers you that much then just present your junk as news again, it is not like any other poster cares about it or gives your stuff any value, so go with whatever makes you happier in the end. Present your own little opinions as news if you prefer, though you have few as you opt to just regurgitate the alt-right content you consume. Not sure if you are aware of your role, but those that create content for you definitely know your role.
I totally applaud you going on team Lucky with that duplicate of his post to me earlier this week. Let me know when you, like him, start believing the governments are releasing mind control gasses without paying the extra few bucks to make them invisible. You are really making interesting choices with whom you choose to mimic! Hopefully, unlike him, you believe the Holocaust actually took place and also the kids in school shootings are not actually actors. Some things are best for you not to mimic from the people you choose to consume and duplicate.
I totally applaud you going on team Lucky with that duplicate of his post to me earlier this week. Let me know when you, like him, start believing the governments are releasing mind control gasses without paying the extra few bucks to make them invisible. You are really making interesting choices with whom you choose to mimic! Hopefully unlike him, you believe the Holocaust actually took place and also the kids in school shootings are not actually actors. Some things are best for you not to mimic from the people you choose to copy.
Lol
If that is what polievre count on to win .
No arguments , no solutions, just complains .
One of those woman was hilarious .
She win 34$ an hour and can’t function ?
Jfc give here 50$ an hour it will be the same thing for her lol .
Well at least they don’t live in Europe , they would probably killed themselves if they were .
Still over 5% with much higher energy and house prices in Europe.
Canadians just have no idea how actually Canada isn’t that bad when compared to the rest of the world .
We did actually ok just like in 2008 crisis .
Lol
If that is what polievre count on to win .
No arguments , no solutions, just complains .
One of those woman was hilarious .
She win 34$ an hour and can’t function ?
Jfc give here 50$ an hour it will be the same thing for her lol .
Well at least they don’t live in Europe , they would probably killed themselves if they were .
Still over 5% with much higher energy and house prices in Europe.
Canadians just have no idea how actually Canada isn’t that bad when compared to the rest of the world .
We did actually ok just like in 2008 crisis .
Canada is fricking expensive compared to many other countries
If she was smart she would become an MP were you earn $195,000 a year and get a raise every year under the liberals
If she was single $34 hour should be livable unless she lives in Vancouver were a I saw a 200 sq ft apartment on Hastings Street for $2000 a month . $65,000 a year at $34 hour
Very slightly better than when anti-vaxxers here tried pitching "vaccine fundamentalists" as a term, but it is still weak because at first read it reads like cleemitard due to the m being followed by an i instead of an a. Also, tard - ie: short for a word that gets censored here is a pretty bad/retro term, so I suppose this new word has the required derp ingredients. Overall, not that great, though I have seen worse,but hard to see it really catch on. I can safely assume you did not think of it.
Very slightly better than when anti-vaxxers here tried pitching "vaccine fundamentalists" as a term, but it is still weak because at first read it reads like cleemitard due to the m being followed by an i instead of an a. Also, tard - ie: short for a word that gets censored here is a pretty bad/retro term, so I suppose this new word has the required derp ingredients. Overall, not that great, though I have seen worse,but hard to see it really catch on. I can safely assume you did not think of it.
All the best.
I’m not smart enough to make up words like this . I received it from my alt right deep deep deep media source
I'm still confused. Do you think g7 countries should have a price on carbon or not? They can obviously also do other things like poilievre's talking point of "technology" in addition.
I'm still confused. Do you think g7 countries should have a price on carbon or not? They can obviously also do other things like poilievre's talking point of "technology" in addition.