I remember in 2013 when the conservatives first starting doling out this line. You'd think a decade later they'd remember a specific policy or two they can use as a new criticism, but I guess not.

Weird every time JT talks lately it's to trash Pierre

7-8 years and I'm not better off so why should a vote for a man that wraps up ethics violations, doesn't seem to be briefed on anything and has achieved very little #climatephony

You'd think you would know I've had plenty of criticisms of his policies. But you were referring to Pollivere's character in your post. What type of character do you think someone has that believes they can run a G7 country because of their last name?

Oh wow, you actually thought that was a good enough line to double down on it? Well, the line has failed for the last decade, but I guess here's hoping it finally sticks?

It's not a line. It's a question about someones character, which you refuse to answer.

Lol, of course it's a line. A pathetic one. One that was tried and failed a decade ago. There is nothing to answer, nobody actually think that his singular belief about his qualifications is because of his last name. Sure, that likely played a partial role in his 2013 leadership win, but so did his policy agenda and messaging and values etc, and regardless of any of that now a decade later his record and accomplishes speak for themselves - either for or against. So to keep bringing up his name is ridiculous.

It isn't like Poilievre has any additional justification to lead a G7 country, he spent his life in conservative politics circles in his youth and then has just been an MP for a little longer than Trudeau.

The problem isn’t trudeau character .
No one dispute jt isn’t a great pm .
It’s the opposition that is even worst ….

Are we to believe on how polievre talk and the arguments he uses , he would be great as a leader as well in international stage ?
Come on ….

Polievre is a reform Party narrative , that is a regional view , not a Canadian view .
Good luck staying in the opposition for the next 4 years .

Accomplishments ??? WTF

What accomplishments. His failures are 10 fold and the scandals

So danielle smith won , good for her.

isnt there like a dissonance in one of her policy she wants to implements?

https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/alberta-u...cted-1.6399367

So in one instance they call JT a dictator ,anti freedom, etc. for "forcing people" to vaccine themselves to work to protect the population and its bad,
but here forcing against their will those people its ok ?

As long its something they agree with, its ok to force people against their own will and nvm freedom of choice , even tho the risk for others exist.

How strange...

The question is do they have the space for these people. The drug problem just gets worse and worse . Not sure what the solution is

Surprised the election wasn't closer . Had a few friends that had voted Notley or Kenney last election that stayed home didn't like either candidate.

Hum so u think forcing people isn’t the isssue but lack of space is huh ?

To be honest I have never had a family member or friend that has been caught up in this Fentanyl addiction thing that seems to be getting worse and worse. Though I would tend to think that if it was a family member or friend I would be OK with forced drug rehab or jail. Isnt that what Portugal is doing with great success with legalizing drugs.
Do you know how much of a drain on our health system is this drug addiction crisis

What Vancouver seems to be testing does not seem to be working either

Though I would guess some lawyer would challenge it

Comparing forcing a vaccine to forced rehab are two entirely different issues.

No, Portugal do not use cohesion !
Yes i know and it is far less then covid !
They are identical in the issues behind liberty of choice....

No ones committing crimes to get a fix of the Covid Vaccine. You keep forgetting I have yet to say vaccine mandates were wrong my only comment for the 5th time is that they were not voluntary but forced and JT is lying when he said he forced no one to get a vaccine

I know and that is why I’m surprise in alberta no one complaining on people being forced by the government to get medical treatment from drug abuses ….

Like I said when the narrative goes on the side of the conservative , strangely liberty of choice takes another turn ….

When I hear from Canada as a whole , , or trudeau as a prime minister , do not do enough for alberta and it’s oil it piss me off ….

“Ottawa backs $3-billion of debt for Trans Mountain pipeline”

“In March, Trans Mountain Corp. reported the estimated costs for its expansion had ballooned to $30.9-billion, an increase of more than 300 per cent from the initial $7.4-billion that former owner Kinder Morgan Canada forecast in 2017.

“The expansion project, which is due to be completed early next year, will nearly triple the pipeline’s throughput to 890,000 barrels a day. Eighty per cent of the capacity of the expanded pipeline has been allocated to 11 Canadian and international producers and refiners, under 15- and 20-year transport contracts.”

Trudeau is doing more than almost any other PM ever for alberta and people hates him over because his anti oil lol .
Jfc …

Oh yes that carbon tax cost a lot of money lol.
Let’s not talk about that 30 billions ….

So your blaming Alberta for Trudeau buying a pipeline that was to cost 7 billion and now sits at 31 billion ? Guess what I know folks working on this thing and it will hit 40 billion .

Agreed, Trudeau should have let the project die and kept Albertan oil in the ground. If Albertans aren't going to give Trudeau massive - MASSIVE - credit for bending over backwards to subsidize their oil industry for them, then they can keep that oil right where it is.

No what the government needs to do is create a better system for approving these projects. I never supported the government buying a pipeline and do not support 15 billion to get battery plants . The VW one is just plain crazy

The problem is when it takes 5 years to get a project approved and your a company and gone through all the approval process and have the green light and than you have a government that takes 2 years to think about it and than says lets wait a bit longer what company will invest the time and $$$$

The oil money has gone to other countries instead of Canada and is phony climate policies that do nothing but kill Alberta and Saskatchewan jobs

Though at least we agree it was a bad purchase by the government

If there isn't a business case to build pipelines in Canada because of the cost of doing proper environmental reviews and following our legal duty to consult with first nations peoples, then it shouldn't be built. Keep the oil in the ground.

But when your buddy thinks it is so so so important that Albertan oil gets to market that he is willing to subsidize the cost by the taxpayers across the country above and beyond what the market would sustain so Alberta can get its oil to market, you should be genuflecting, not piling on.

Though you agree that if the company has gone through all the environmental reviews and consulted with first nations it should be approved by the federal government if they met the standards?

If it is in the interest of the country, it isn't unconditional. In this case, the government DID approve trans mountain expansion. I don't think they should have. I think the oil should stay in the ground. I don't think it is in the best interests of the country. But the trudeau government did the thing you want, you should applaud!

Is that really what u took from my post o0 ?????

Like I said I’m Tired to hear the BS alberta and people of the west says about Canada , JT , etc. Being against oil and do nothing from them .
That stupid lied narrative they keep saying while obv everything lean th either way .

+1
But instead they despise him .
Go figure .

I have not said he is against oil I have called him a climate phony for buying the pipeline, not halting coal exports from the US through CDN ports immediately. Making decisions on projects based on how that province or area votes. And the big one no chance at meeting Paris Climate Goals or even reducing emissions all the while why crushing development and investment in the oil sector.

AS well I do not support 15 billion for battery factories in Ontario. You do realize that the country as a whole benefits from all those oil royalties

Yes and those batteries factories will wane money as well and gives good job too I suppose?
What’s your point ?

Alberta keep saying they pay too much money to Canada while they always forget they do get huge help as well many times for their oil ….