In his "For You"...you know, the **** a person just tends to scroll through if they're so inclined to look at that? I'm not even remotely surprised he can't cite one off the top of his head. I mean, I'd question why someone would even want to read the "For You" tab, but everyone uses Twitter their own way.

But again, if the reporter gives him one example, or ten, or fifty, how will that enable Musk to answer the question in a way that he can't without it?

So after as many methods as they can come up with the Liberals stalled Katie Telford from testifying and I am not sure why as she basically pled the fifth on most questions citing national intelligence.

Only a public inquiry at this point will reveal the truth that Justin Trudeau knew about election interference and did nothing because the Chinese were helping the liberals

I like how you prejudge that this is the truth despite there being zero evidence to suspect this is true. It might prove true that the situation was mishandled, but there is no reason to think it was mishandled because the liberals wanted to keep some electoral benefit from the Chinese.

Zero evidence the government was warned by CSIS and you know when a person has a history of lying you tend to stop believing them and our PM has distorted the truth on a few items

You keep doing that routine of saying an opinion (often quite biased) and pretending it is an agreed upon fact.

The CSIS or Trudeau has a history of lying ?

Was commenting on how you mix opinions on things with agreed upon facts. Then you usually try to double down on it like you just did. You do that all the time, so I would say those agencies are not the ones that are being creative with things.

Feel free to provide all the verifiable evidence you have that as you put it "the Chinese were helping the liberals" and that it was essentially covered up. You state this like it is some agreed upon fact, so this should be easy for you to do. Try to show actual evidence to back your beliefs instead of cited biased opinion pieces. Thanks in advance.

You are doing that thing again where you make outlandish claims, and when this is pointed out you treat back into safe territory. If you had spoken about CSIS warnings, then sure, I might agree there is some smoke there. But you claimed they "did nothing because the Chinese were helping the liberals". This is just vapid speculation with zero evidence.

Elon is currently public enemy #1 in your media echo chamber. It's why you are going to such great lengths to defend some shitty reporter who sucks at his job (Elon obviously doesn't).

The dude cited one derpy interaction with a reporter as a basis for evaluating media as a whole. I get it is messaging his passive followers like to hear, but seems the math of that theory is a bit weak. No doubt you disagree since it is a message you want to be told, hence now you build on it with spooky media echo chamber comments and such. I always have to give Musk and others who create content for their passive followers credit - it is a great business model in general, even if that dude eventually runs Twitter into the ground after overpaying for it. His followers will not care if that happens, because it will be packaged to them as a sign of success and they will believe it. Then they can blame the media or perhaps immigrants.

All the best.

Well if that was true why all the tricks to stop a public inquiry? Or all the tricks to keep Telford from testifying?

I guess you could be right as it's not like Justin has lied in the past or even this week and we know how transparent he is

Because he's worried an investigation will make them look bad. Because he doesn't want to take the chance it will. Or it could be that the Chinese were helping the Liberals and he knows it.

The point isn't that anyone is telling you that didn't happen. The point is you state it as a fact:

I think Trudeau and the Liberals have handled this like buffoons from the beginning. And I've been tired of the Liberals for quite a while now for the same reason it always seems to happen for me - they get in power for a while and get increasingly arrogant. But I'll wait for evidence before I decide that the Chinese were definitely helping the Liberals. That said, the more Trudeau does to make it difficult to investigate, the more I will lean to that being likely.

I almost fell off the couch as I didn't see the posters name and thought this was shifty

Take that as an indication that if you present things without tacking on your obsessive anti-Trudeau baggage then you may find that your posts are taken more seriously. However if you keep tossing in crazy non-facts as facts then it just makes your post look like a Grandpa Simpsons yelling at Trudeau clouds. Yeah, we know most moments of your day are spent being angry about Trudeau, but try to fake that away in your posts if you want them to get a bit more traction, and that is not being said because I like Trudeau. Insert any other name and it is the same thing, it is the reason why I place zero value on the MSNBC spammer here as well.

+1

The problem is the best replacement for trudeau is in the liberal party itself .

Fwiw the problem with lozen theory is the relation between Canada and China is pretty low due trudeau actions (regardless if he was right or not in those actions ) .
I have big difficulty seeing China supporting trudeau ….

LOL.

I imagine there are plenty of middle/middle-left people that have had enough of Trudeau, but don't feel there are a lot of good alternatives. We just don't bother hammering Trudeau at every turn because there's not a lot of point, and we have you and shifty to do that for us. And because the Liberals, in very general terms, line up closest with my vision of Canada. Montrealcorp. said it well - "The problem is the best replacement for trudeau is in the liberal party itself." Although it might need another good housecleaning first, because the entitlement/arrogance runs deeper than JT, of course. There are some local Liberal MPs that I meet with from time to time that I think do a good job; my own riding is fairly conservative because we're on a bit of a rural/urban border, so it likely won't matter much how I vote anyway.

I kinda of agree that best replacement for Trudeau may be in the liberal party itself
I'm willing to give Pierre Polliviere a chance though

The liberals have no chance as a party to win a majority. When this occurs you think the party would dump him when they have a bunch of better candidates that could fill the role as a leader

And u think polievre , with the discourse he got he could find a majority ???
As if the reason the Canadian didn’t vote for conservative before polievre because it wasn’t enough on the right ??

Fwiw I don’t think will ever see a prime minister like Maxime Bernier over trudeau unless trudeau become a Russian or North Korean …..

U won’t have an increase of common ground in canada by going further down the path of far right movement and conspiracies….

Maxime Bernier should give u hint about that .

In his defense, he did say he didn't think the Liberals could win a majority, so both can be true - another minority government.

Unfortunately, the Liberals have a couple more years and with the path they're on, they may well give the Conservatives control.

Yes but I don’t see the reform party being able to win a minority by itself either .
That is how harper came in power right ?
The unification of the right by leaving behind the Maxime Bernier wannabe is the way to go , certainly not the opposite imo .
Quebec would probably take care of the falling of liberals by going bloc , certainly not polievre …
Ontario already got ford , I don’t think they would lean even more on polievre instead of npd , but I could be wrong tho I’m willing to make a substantial bet on it

I wouldn't count Poilievre out for a minority, especially with the Liberals doing everything they can to help him.

Yeah I do I never thought he was the best choice for leader I preferred Peter McKay but the Conservatives don't always pick the person that they can win with .

I'm voting conservative as I just can not vote for someone I think is corrupt and dishonest . If the liberals replaced Justin I might consider voting that way .

If the federal workers strike Trudeau will have more problems

And 6 months ago I would say the conservatives never get a majority but now ....

So this happened today.

A Musk/Jordan Peterson combo. No surprise that you were one of the first to fist pump about it. Be sure to follow them and buy their merch, they earned it from you.

All the best.

That's fine. The whole "government-funded media" label is a bit silly for a few reasons, but sure. However, this is not fine:


It is utterly despicable that your guy is completely conflating "government-funded" which of course is true (and true of many of our for-profit media too) with being "Trudeau propaganda, not news". One can complain about whatever minor bias CBC may or may not have, but this of course is a disgusting lie.

This isn't just a one-off. He early calls it " disinformation and manipulation by state media."



Disgusting.