Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
People taking over 6 city blocks, having armed guards patrol it, while limiting movement and restricting the press's access, is not a protest. It's an occupation. What ****ing world do you live?
Hmm armed people standing guard to protect and sanction lawlessness is anti-democratic? If only there were other instances of this we can look to in recent months that half the country supported...
btw, the article you cited: "During our six-hour afternoon visit, we did not see any examples of what police are talking about, but that doesn’t mean it’s not happening." Do you have evidence that this is happening besides the fact that Seattle PD, surely unbiased in this matter, told you it is? Why is having armed guards prima facie undemocratic, do you hate the second amendment?
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
The argument is not that people are hypocrites, it's that if you support or condone this activity, it's illiberal.
So was intentionally violating segregation laws in the 60s instead of appealing to elected representatives for change. Being like "oh no, you support something
illiberal" is sooooo boring, is that the only point you came here to make?