Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Um, OK.
Although it may not seem like it sometimes, I lack your interest in engaging in long arguments about pretty much anything, so I'll let it go at that.
Oh you have interest but it is very specific who you will call out.
Again, a standard of 'Verified Talk.. no rumours if anyone is part of 'protected group'' is just a ridiculous, unworkable standard. Hopefully you see the error in that and why the criticism of me on this issue was bullox, as chez might say.
Again the Maga Kids and that indigenous protestor drummer are the best example. And CNN getting the story very wrong to begin with and sued successfully for that.
Are we allowed to discuss it here while its topical... in the headlines?? Does one person being indigenous (protected) mean we cannot?
It would be nice if people on this forum would admit to the reactionary nature of some due to a few people here who tend to scream 'fire', 'hurl a bunch of lies and innuendo as if truth', all in an attempt to slander anyone seen as darign to discussing a 'forbidden' topic, while using the tactics of lies and innuendo to try and 'cancel any discussion' and for people to be more aware the next time.
As it absolutely is a tactic. The lying, the slander, the screaming as if someone just said the NWord in the forum, is an attempt to whip up drama, where a truthful accounting of the situation would not work, in an attempt to silence any current or future such discussions.
It is a core cancel culture technique to let others know, things will get escalated and out of hand quickly if you dare tread into this area and you will find yourself defending against the worst accusations we can label you with.