Can you be any more pathetic? Saying there is reasonable doubt to a crime being committed is not justifying anything.

But Chauvin's actions did constitute a crime being committed. I think that's pretty clear cut and I'll be surprised if the defence manages reasonable doubt here. Even the cops are testifying against him.

Hi, Coopster. When were you made a Moderator?

By the way, I like it when you refer to me as Laggy. How do you like Coopster?

“Lagtit” os a better appellation.

I would suggest "The Coopmeister" for that retro feel since he, myself and you are all relics to a sense.

As to the other claims - Lucky is not a dummy - he is just a conspiracyderp that is semi aware of how conspiracyderps like him come across, so he tweaks his messaging a bit as a result, but in the end he basically sucks. IHIV is a dummy. You are not one, and I respect you are comfortable with yourself even if many of your beliefs are fairly outdated and awful. That is to an extent a byprodct of your demographic, but you are at least aware of that dynamic. Many of your age (quite different than mine) do not share your self awareness traits, and they tend to be among the best targets for fleecing that exist as a result.

Cueanon.

He's actually correct though it is ephebophilia not paedophilia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebo...20chronophilia.
Paedophilia is a sexual interest in pre pubescent children.
Ephebophilia is still pervy wrt Gaetz though, no question

I'm gonna presume that's a typo. Otherwise, too funny.

Hi laggy.

I was made a Mod right after you were when you said this to me...

My comment was a very sublte jab about you acting like a Mod. One named Karen. I guess it was too subtle as it seemed to have went over your head, or so this comment above by you, shows.


I like laggy. It just rolls off the tongue easily.

"Coopster" is just ok but I will take it rather than a play on the other part of my user name such as Pee'ster.


Edit : "The Coopmeister" does have a very cool ring to it. Would make me feel like I was in an old movie or tv show.

Edit 2 : "Cueanon" ... lol, no, just no.

On Rotten Tomatoes Cuepee just became QP to everyone who replied to me. Brevity and all that.

And that is actually where the name evolved from. Signing up to sites with the QPZM corners of the keyboard for ease of User Name, similar to using the 'password' as your password. The very first forum signups I did i entered the user name as QPZM which eventually became QP, which then became 'Cuepee', which ironically then got shortened by user to QP.

The circle of life.

So nice of you, out of all the organisations out there, you are suddenly concerned by this one.
I guess you were MIA the last 4 years.
HIV, just a concerned citizen.

Do you have something against those who suffer from HIV or their families?
If not then you shouldn't be using the term as an insult it's extraordinarily insensitive.

Actually, I think you would be a good moderator in this Forum.


By the way, it doesn't take much for something to be "over my head", given what's left of my brain after 22+ years of being on psych meds. (Been off of them for a couple years now.)

True.

How about just Coop (like the former Laker Michael Cooper.)?

Probably a typo. Itshotinvegas is often abbreviated IHIV in this Forum.

Yeah I know and it's absolutely despicable behaviour on the part of some of the posters here. If others disagree with the guy then that's absolutely fair enough- I disagree with him re Chauvin and that LT who got pulled over for example.

But to use a virus that's killed probably millions- many victims who live in poverty- as some form of ad hominem is disgusting and makes me suspect the veracity of their outrage over other issues.

at least we agree that people who refuse to get vaccinated are mentally disabled

What happens when the dog bites someone who is "peacefully protesting", i.e. destroying and stealing police property?

What happened to "just comply with orders and you won't get shot"? Have the boot lickers given up on that fiction?

Must have been sick that day in school and missed the lesson.

No. I posted a Greenwald article that doesn't mention Hunter at all. Slighted brought up Hunter Biden, and I posted GG's response to that criticism. There was no 'whataboutism' in the article.

Sure but to consider Greenwalds comments in that tweet while ignoring the very public and know position he had prior on Hunter would make it useless.

If I said in one post now 'every thing Luckbox says is BS'.

But then a few posts later I am quoting Luckbox agreeing with me to try and substantiate my position, people need to call that out and it is not just misdirect type 'whataboutism' that people properly use that term for.

Quite frankly Greenwalds comments and that tweet should just be deleted. It has zero debate value. Full stop.

If you want to ask why then anyone can expose the logic of why with his stance re Hunter.

What the what are you smoking?
I posted a Glenn Greenwald article talking about Gaetz because we have a Gaetz thread. Then slighted commented, and Greenwald had a tweet that addressed Slighted's comment-- and I posted it.
That's how message boards work sometimes.

Maybe I am missing something in the exchange.

What I am specifically referring to is the tweet YOU posted by Greenwald.

That tweet has no value in this discussion.

It is an example of something rightly nullified and showed as a BS position by him and exposing that via showing his prior stance (whataboutism) is absolutely appropriate in this case. Most whataboutism is nothing but diversion, but in this it is absolutely illustrative of the hypocrisy in his position and showing it is solely political partisanship.


So if you think the tweet belongs (how forums work) then absolutely expect the whataboutism counter rightly which then nullifies making the tweet worth nothing in support of a position.

Or, as I said, just don't post something that is so obviously political partisanship.

It would be like using a statement by Trump to prove up a position and suggesting it is simply whataboutism to show he had exactly the opposite stance in his comments before taking office.

That is not empty whataboutism and is needed to destroy the credibility of the one making the statement.

You're definitely missing something in the exchange.

Unless I missed an update I think technically we're also still under--giving the cops a handjob is the new punk rock.

Was that at me ?

I'm just lazy. I shortened It's Hot In Vegas to Hot In Vegas and then HIV.

But I guess, in the context of arguing here I can find things against HIV and his family. At least the ones who raised him.......