Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Politics and Society Moderation Discussion Only Fans Thread Politics and Society Moderation Discussion Only Fans Thread

01-21-2024 , 04:30 AM
I guess it's possible to want something you don't enjoy but that's an edge case, here's another example imo:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
remember when you got mad when I said you wanted to murder babies? well, looks like you found your way to admit it. sad but we all knew who you were months ago.
So not only does he accuse someone of wanting babies to be murdered, but he references another time he accused this poster of wanting babies to be murdered.


And here is a mod defending the other poster because he believes Victor is accusing him of wanting babies to be murdered:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Nowhere in there does he say he wants to murder babies. Maybe if you read what people said and gave them the benefit of the doubt instead of assuming they're the caricatures you've created, the discussion could be somehow productive.


Would the more reasonable way to read the arguments be that someone believes the bombing is necessary, but they do not desire, want, or enjoy the murdering of babies? A mod here seems to believe so.

Last edited by Bluegrassplayer; 01-21-2024 at 04:36 AM.
01-21-2024 , 04:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
Thanks for that quote. Are you aware of any examples were he said that a particular poster was said to enjoy (or love, etc) babies being killed as metsfin stated?
Sorry, no, I think I misunderstood your question. My experience has been that Victor tends to most frequently paint a very broad brush with his insults.
01-21-2024 , 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
well I know you are going to dismiss all the crimes of Israel and I know why. what I dont understand is why you are still posting about it. we get it. you enjoy dead Palestinian children.
.
01-21-2024 , 05:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
Let me be clear. I am not suggesting in any way that Vic's position is a correct one or a likely one. But I am saying that given his (disputed) opinion that Israel is targeting babies rather than Hamas with the bombing, there is a conclusion that flows that someone who advocates for resuming bombings of Hamas is defacto advocating for resuming bombing babies.
think about it

now, on reflection do you or the holocaust 2 supporting poster named victor see any problems with this line of thinking
01-21-2024 , 05:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
think about it

now, on reflection do you or the holocaust 2 supporting poster named victor see any problems with this line of thinking
If by line of thinking you mean victors position, sure there are problems with that chain of thought. But as I said it's up to other posters to either engage with him or ignore him. I'm not going to mod it away.
01-21-2024 , 05:53 AM
Victor since everything about this issue has played out publicly I'll post this publicly as well. While you can see from this discussion I am not going to take mod action on your posts that suggest that the act of supporting Israel in the war de facto means supporting the bombing that is unquestionably resulting in dead civilians and babies.

But having seen some example posts where you go beyond that to personally attacking a poster or groups of posters as enjoying, loving, desiring, etc babies being killed is a bridge too far and needs to stop immediately. So please refrain from such remarks in the future.

Thanks.
01-21-2024 , 07:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluegrassplayer

Would the more reasonable way to read the arguments be that someone believes the bombing is necessary, but they do not desire, want, or enjoy the murdering of babies? A mod here seems to believe so.
best I will allow is that this might be the case only bc people are cowards that lie to themselves or embrace cognitive dissonance.

again, you cant support the bombing and not support the results.
01-21-2024 , 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
Victor since everything about this issue has played out publicly I'll post this publicly as well. While you can see from this discussion I am not going to take mod action on your posts that suggest that the act of supporting Israel in the war de facto means supporting the bombing that is unquestionably resulting in dead civilians and babies.

But having seen some example posts where you go beyond that to personally attacking a poster or groups of posters as enjoying, loving, desiring, etc babies being killed is a bridge too far and needs to stop immediately. So please refrain from such remarks in the future.

Thanks.
I will just say they support it then since its less inflammatory.
01-21-2024 , 08:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
I will just say they support it then since its less inflammatory.
Thanks.
01-21-2024 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Israel doesn't target babies
Not one person in this thread has said they want dead babies
Not one
But victor is allowed to say i enjoy dead babies because i don't have the strength to write a 2 page dissertation saying i do. Just because im a zionist i like dead babies.

Sounds legit
I mean, you have no problem saying feminists like dead babies whenever you get involved in an abortion discussion. How do you like it?
01-21-2024 , 12:01 PM
Lol mets. Owned.
01-21-2024 , 12:36 PM
I just assume Victor is juiced in or whatever and can't be moderated.
01-21-2024 , 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
I just assume Victor is juiced in or whatever and can't be moderated.
Bad assumption.
01-21-2024 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
Bad assumption.
I know, but it gives me a framework to make sense of things.
01-21-2024 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
I know, but it gives me a framework to make sense of things.
LOL. OK.
01-21-2024 , 02:02 PM
Victor must have nudes of browser
01-21-2024 , 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
Victor must have nudes of browser
Let me check the sales log from my only fans page.
01-21-2024 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
As to the racist term, Palestinians are not a race. Arab is not a race..
As I feared - you seem to be ignorant of the broad definition of racism, which doesn't apply only to people of the same ethnicity because race is a social construct.

So making derogatory comments about the Portuguese or about Arabs is racism.
01-21-2024 , 02:24 PM
Just say bigoted toward, problem solved.
01-21-2024 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpus vile
Just say bigoted toward, problem solved.
But then, what we have to argue about for pages and weeks on end?
01-21-2024 , 02:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
As I feared - you seem to be ignorant of the broad definition of racism, which doesn't apply only to people of the same ethnicity because race is a social construct.

So making derogatory comments about the Portuguese or about Arabs is racism.
You are welcome to choose any definition you like for racism and then apply it to any group you like. My comment used the primary definition as listed in multiple dictionaries and I applied it as such.

So Im not going to go down another rabbit hole of word definitions with you.
01-21-2024 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
But then, what we have to argue about for pages and weeks on end?
Iunno. What constitutes a bigot and whether the comments meet the criteria for bigotry maybe. I'm sure we can get a few pages outa that. Or Browser nudegate. Especially if it involves...tumescence.
01-21-2024 , 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
You are welcome to choose any definition you like for racism and then apply it to any group you like. My comment used the primary definition as listed in multiple dictionaries and I applied it as such.

So Im not going to go down another rabbit hole of word definitions with you.
Yeah but racism and bigotry make good bedfellows so maybe it's a semantics argument?
01-21-2024 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
But then, what we have to argue about for pages and weeks on end?
Next up we will finally settle the happy versus glad debate. And I for one will be happy we did.
01-21-2024 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
You are welcome to choose any definition you like for racism and then apply it to any group you like. My comment used the primary definition as listed in multiple dictionaries and I applied it as such.

So Im not going to go down another rabbit hole of word definitions with you.
You are not able to properly apply the fuzzy, observer dependent concept of race to the present conversation. Broad concepts like race or communism or civilization cannot be fully defined in a few sentences. That you fell down s rabbit hole that a person who understands these better can easily avoid is nobody's fault but yours.

      
m