Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread

07-13-2019 , 07:18 AM
Age of consent is a good example of a law we often don't want enforced. Prosecuting two underage people would be ludicrous and so would prosecuting someone who's a few days over for having sex with someone who's a few days under. There's no perfect way to frame this law so we have an age of consent and use some judgement on when it should be enforced.

Immigration is more complicated but if we are having laws then I suspect the best answer is laws that are often not enforced. It's trickier because illegal status leaves you open to exploitation/abuse and creates conditions that trump/etc can exploit. The only good solutions are very welcoming once.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 08:25 AM
Meh I think merely looking at "should we be flexible in enforcing these laws?" is a narrow way of looking at it.

Currently, the naivitist hardliner Trump, in spite of all this talk about foreigners, keeps asking for visas for foreigners to work for him, because they're cheaper than Americans. ICE raids happen mostly in liberal urban enclaves, not in the Midwest where huge swaths of the farm workers are illegal immigrants because it would devastate the mostly white conservatives who are advocating for mass deportations of immigrants.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 09:56 AM
Are huge swaths of farm workers in the midwest undocumented? I know chicken farms require lots of labor but corn, soybean, wheat production is all mechanized. When you drive past those fields you never see anyone...or it is one guy driving a tractor.
It's California that requires lots of labor because they have things to pick that can't be harvested mechanically.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 10:01 AM
I think the ideal is clearly that we have good laws on the books and that they are enforced fairly and consistently. This is not a practical reality, for a variety of reasons, and therefore some flouting of the law is desirable in society.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskalator
I think the ideal is clearly that we have good laws on the books and that they are enforced fairly and consistently. This is not a practical reality, for a variety of reasons, and therefore some flouting of the law is desirable in society.
But when the status quo is cities/states passing their own laws to block the federal government from enforcing its laws, That is probably a sign the current working solution isn’t working at all.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
Are huge swaths of farm workers in the midwest undocumented? I know chicken farms require lots of labor but corn, soybean, wheat production is all mechanized. When you drive past those fields you never see anyone...or it is one guy driving a tractor.
It's California that requires lots of labor because they have things to pick that can't be harvested mechanically.
think dairy farms and slaughterhouses.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 12:20 PM
Sometimes no one is driving the tractor.

The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 12:35 PM
Enforcement is a fairly nebulous term as it can mean different behaviors in an array of situational context.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
think dairy farms and slaughterhouses.
Makes sense. My part of the midwest (central Missouri) has none or few of those and that aspect of midwest agriculture is foriegn to me.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus999
Well, in fairness the article actually says this concerning Amazon, "Uber Technologies Inc. and Amazon have been looking for large office space at the Farley Building, say people briefed on the matter," which isn't really the same thing as suggesting they have already committed.

Also, the article states most of the new tech expansion seems to be in Manhattan, where the subsidized H2Q was going to be in Queens. I admit I don't know NY that well, but maybe that should matter? Is more corporate wealth being concentrated in Manhattan even a good thing?
It's inevitable Amazon will have a presence in NYC. Amazon going from a few million sqft of space as an anchor tenant that can transform a neighborhood to a few hundred k sqft in a neighborhood that's already overdeveloped is still a huge loss for NYC.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 05:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus999
But when the status quo is cities/states passing their own laws to block the federal government from enforcing its laws, That is probably a sign the current working solution isn’t working at all.
Kelhus, in the past, have you learned anything about how accurate your "guesses" are?

Also, what the **** are you talking about? Is this what you think "Sanctuary Cities" are? Jesus Christ.

(the weird undercurrent through all of this is the xenophobia allegedly caused by immigration which is the reason to curb immigration is represented here by.... Kelhus himself. Just cut that **** out? How about that as Plan A)
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-13-2019 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizy
It's inevitable Amazon will have a presence in NYC.
Yeah, no kidding. That is precisely why giving them a billion dollars to set up shop was an incredibly stupid idea.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-16-2019 , 08:01 AM
Why we should have pre filled tax returns and cut out tax software companies entirely. Intuit wants to take their cut regardless of how simple you make taxes and they'll continously find ways to get it

Quote:
Because the new law almost doubled the standard deduction, Intuit faced a loss of users of its Deluxe edition. Most of the millions of Americans who would no longer be itemizing their deductions are relatively affluent — making more than $75,000 a year — but they would now potentially be eligible to use the Free Edition.

In response, the company bumped a number of forms typically used by lower-income filers, which were previously available in the Free Edition, into paying editions. “They were always supposed to be customer focused, customer first,” one former staffer said. But the income levels of the groups that were being driven to paid products “was never really considered.”

Thirty TurboTax customers told ProPublica that they were charged as a result of needing to use one of the forms that used to be free.

One of these forms was for a tax credit that goes exclusively to poor taxpayers who are elderly or get disability benefits. Another is used by low- to middle-income households that receive a credit for putting money in a retirement account. A third is used by taxpayers who collected unemployment benefits.

https://www.propublica.org/article/t...ampaign=buffer
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-17-2019 , 01:31 PM
Yeah, Intuit got me this year. I didn't want to pay, but I'd already put the time into it and saving a few bucks wasn't worth it
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-17-2019 , 03:13 PM
The Atlantic has an interesting profile of Raj Chetty, a Harvard economist who has done a lot of work on mapping intergenerational mobility, some of which I've linked in the past. Pretty good read.

Quote:
or all he’s learned about where opportunity resides in America, Chetty knows surprisingly little about what makes one place better than another. He and Hendren have gathered a range of social-science data sets and looked for correlations to the atlas. The high-opportunity places, they’ve found, tend to share five qualities: good schools, greater levels of social cohesion, many two-parent families, low levels of income inequality, and little residential segregation, by either class or race. The list is suggestive, but hard to interpret.

For example, the strongest correlation is the number of intact families. The explanation seems obvious: A second parent usually means higher family income as well as more stability, a broader social network, additional emotional support, and many other intangibles. Yet children’s upward mobility was strongly correlated with two-parent families only in the neighborhood, not necessarily in their home. There are so many things the data might be trying to say. Maybe fathers in a neighborhood serve as mentors and role models? Or maybe there is no causal connection at all. Perhaps, for example, places with strong church communities help kids while also fostering strong marriages. The same kinds of questions flow from every correlation; each one may mean many things. What is cause, what is effect, and what are we missing? Chetty’s microscope has revealed a new world, but not what animates it—or how to change it.

Chetty has found that opportunity does not correlate with many traditional economic measures, such as employment or wage growth. In the search for opportunity’s cause, he is instead focusing on an idea borrowed from sociology: social capital. The term refers broadly to the set of connections that ease a person’s way through the world, providing support and inspiration and opening doors.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-17-2019 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
In a panel on immigration, University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax claimed that immigrants are too loud and responsible for an increase in “litter.” She explicitly advocated an immigration policy that would favor immigrants from Western countries over non-Western ones; “the position,” as she put it, “that our country will be better off with more whites and fewer nonwhites.” (She claims this is not racist because her problem with nonwhite immigrants is cultural rather than biological.)

This is the problem with any attempt to build conservative nationalism in a nutshell. At a very abstract level, it’s possible to make non-racist arguments for a more restrictive immigration policy and a more broadly nationalist ethos. But when you get to the level of actual policy and politics, these ideas nearly inevitably end up devolving into attacks on minority groups.
Goes to my theory that a lot of people know you can't use race so they just use "culture" as a stand in.

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/17/206965...nce-2019-trump

Last edited by Huehuecoyotl; 07-17-2019 at 07:12 PM.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-17-2019 , 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Goes to my theory that a lot of people know you can't use race so they just use "culture" as a stand in.

https://www.vox.com/2019/7/17/206965...nce-2019-trump
The left has no issue painting racism as largely a white american flaw that has, and continues to plague that particular demographic, with the implicit understanding that flaw is not inherent. It's not an unreasonable position.

The issue comes in when you start to address things unique to minorities, especially negatives ones. The left almost always classify such concern with those issues as racist. By and large, unless it has to do with, or the affects of the racism perpetrated by white people, those other issues never get passed "that's racist to say that". The left almost always considers such issues as an attempt to attribute an inherent negative characteristic, when it most cases it's clearly not meant as an inherent characteristic, but rather extrinsic. So, those issues never get discussed.

Why is that?

PS: I'm not proponent of what Wax said in that article

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 07-17-2019 at 09:15 PM.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-18-2019 , 12:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
The Atlantic has an interesting profile of Raj Chetty, a Harvard economist who has done a lot of work on mapping intergenerational mobility, some of which I've linked in the past. Pretty good read.
The high-opportunity places, they’ve found, tend to share five qualities: good schools, greater levels of social cohesion, many two-parent families, low levels of income inequality, and little residential segregation, by either class or race. The list is suggestive, but hard to interpret.

For example, the strongest correlation is the number of intact families.

It seems pretty evident that identity politics negatively impacts all of these measures of social cohesion; so it probably shouldn't be too much of a surprise social mobility is at an all time low and income inequality an all time high.

I doubt a sitting President holding rallies to attack his political opponents along identity politics lines is helping very much.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-18-2019 , 08:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
The left has no issue painting racism as largely a white american flaw that has, and continues to plague that particular demographic, with the implicit understanding that flaw is not inherent. It's not an unreasonable position.

The issue comes in when you start to address things unique to minorities, especially negatives ones. The left almost always classify such concern with those issues as racist. By and large, unless it has to do with, or the affects of the racism perpetrated by white people, those other issues never get passed "that's racist to say that". The left almost always considers such issues as an attempt to attribute an inherent negative characteristic, when it most cases it's clearly not meant as an inherent characteristic, but rather extrinsic. So, those issues never get discussed.

Why is that?

PS: I'm not proponent of what Wax said in that article
Culture is an easy example because 'culture' is a difficult thing to study, especially when it comes to how people act, are acted on, and react to. It takes a lot of surveying, ethnographic study, etc. But it's used in a lot of 'just so' stories.

Someone will pick some perceived fact for something and then blame the culture with no studying and declare that until they fix that issue they're never live up to what society expects.

It's certainly possible to be concerned about culture or whatever in minority populations but you have to show that you're going to actually put the in the work. It won't stop every malintended comment obviously but at least someone might take that person seriously and not dismiss them.

Last edited by Huehuecoyotl; 07-18-2019 at 08:42 AM.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-19-2019 , 03:02 PM
wtf have I missed?
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-19-2019 , 04:10 PM
brexit sorted?

Nope not that, but just about everything else.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-20-2019 , 03:42 PM
any book recommendations on corruption in modern day government? I want to learn how the various pay to play schemes work.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-21-2019 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostmypw
any book recommendations on corruption in modern day government? I want to learn how the various pay to play schemes work.
https://www.amazon.com/Corruption-Am.../dp/0674659988
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-21-2019 , 12:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostmypw
any book recommendations on corruption in modern day government? I want to learn how the various pay to play schemes work.
A little older now, but Plunkitt of Tammany Hall is still a classic worth reading.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/a.../tammany-hall/
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote
07-21-2019 , 08:50 AM

CALIFORNIA CITIES STRUGGLE WITH SEVERE RAT INFESTATION

Quote:
DEAR CALIFORNIA RESIDENT:
California is being overrun by rodents. Without immediate emergency action by state and local government, we face significant economic costs and risk a public health crisis.
Over the past six months, there have been numerous, shocking accounts of city workers being bitten by rodents, police officers diagnosed with Typhus, and even a rat falling from the ceiling of a restaurant onto the menu of a patron. These incidents all signaled an undeniable problem with the population of rodents in our state.
As a result of these incidents, Reform California commissioned this study, assembled a study team, and surveyed pest control professionals, city workers, and public health experts.
The results are quite concerning. Both in terms of measurement and observation, it is clear that California’s rodent population is exploding.
Worse, as this crisis is just now coming to public light, California politicians are poised to do the worst possible thing: pass a law (AB 1788) to ban the most effective rodent control tools we have!
Without these proven rodent control tools in our arsenal, we may see rodent infestations spread.
While the economic costs to Californians of widespread rodent infestations is significant, the public health risk is even worse.
It is time for state and local government officials to acknowledge this problem and take immediate action to control on the rodent population. Failure to do so will result in severe consequences to residents of our state.
Sincerely,
Carl DeMaio
Chairman
Reform California

SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS
• California is experiencing a massive spike in its rodent population that is both measured by available data sets and observed by field personnel
• Pest control professionals and sanitation workers have observed an alarming increase in
Norway rats moving around during the day which is highly abnormal behavior for these species of rodents
• Increase in California’s rodent population is not explained by environmental factors – but is directly related to the elimination of effective rodent control methods and a spike in the homeless population
• Rodent infestations will impose a massive economic cost on California homeowners, businesses, and communities
• Winter is coming: California residents will see increased rodent impacts as weather cools
• Rodent infestations fueling an increase in dangerous diseases such as Typhus – current rate of increase in cases raises concern regarding possible public health epidemic
So sad to see this happening in such a great place.
The (ostensibly) Low Content Thread Quote

      
m