Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Police brutality and police reform (US) Police brutality and police reform (US)

09-24-2020 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wet work
I've had a high ranking police officer point blank/dead serious tell me he thinks making buds legal means stoners will start stealing cars etc--because they're just 'criminals'. So, ya a little out of touch with reality Overall the drug biz is so big(and also drives a lot of other crime) that it's kinda hard to see any of the other plausible avenues being close to a 1:1 replacement. Many of those more org groups are already diversified as it is too. Even if other types of crime increased property theft etc--it's still kinda hard to imagine the violence etc sticking around with it. There are some immediate positives that would most likely be more long lasting imo anyway.

While I can see more org. groups potentially focusing on some other form of crime I also think there's a fair bit of bs tossed into that hypothesis as well. Making those arguments are more about job security imo--because they come from a mindset of basically well you'll still need us. And at this point--they're just about the only people left on the other side of the argument
Said with a drink in hand and steroids pulsing through his veins no doubt.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5 south
Well the boyfriend that shot a cop during the home invasion was released the next day with no charges filed. That points to the police conducting the home invasion improperly and while they were conducting this improperly there was at the least a wonderful death.
There is no consequence when you do your job improperly and someone dies because of your negligence?
I don’t think it points to that. If you look at the history of no knock incidents sometimes people are charged and sometimes not. The boyfriend’s behavior made it seem he didn’t know; was woken up/didn’t hear police, fired just a single shot, called 911 himself right after.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-knock_warrant
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpus vile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlant...t#Demographics
Male: 82%
Female: 18%
African American/Black: 58%
Caucasian/ White: 37%
Hispanic: 4%
Asian: 1%
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7349662/reference
Cops aren't black or white. They're blue, and they put that race above any other.

But don't let it be a black and a white one
'Cause they'll slam ya down to the street top
Black police showing out for the white cop
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
What these cops did was not proportional, in any sense. It started with an erroneous warrant they never should have got, and turned into an execution of a bystander when another person rightly used self defense when faced with an impossible situation.

At every step, compounding police errors caused this death and the charges end up being laughable.
Why was the warrant erroneous? They had lots of video surveillance and audio recordings to show the judge who gave the warrant. The warrant wasn’t erroneous IMO the execution of it was. It’s high risk to break down someone’s door while they are likely sleeping or awoken confused to the banging. They knew the drug dealer was at one of the drop houses that was going to be simultaneously raided. However the warrant was legal and the police are allowed to bang in the door. Once they were fired upon its proportionate for the police to return fire. (I should say the police being fired upon, the terminated officer was in a different location and should be charged the same as any civilian who fired into a building randomly. If his bullets had hit Breonna he could have had additional charges.) What the police did and the boyfriend did were both reasonable. The no knock warrant is what put both parties in this position.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
Without a doubt, I would say government is the more dangerous entity in the balance between Government as regulator and Business as well driver.

Business may wish changes and protections and advantages but it is gov't that gives them the power to grab and keep those things.

Gov't ultimately is the whore and Corporations the rich client. And the whore main item of sale to enrich themselves is the transference of power from citizens to the corporations.
With the information in the previous link in mind, check this out:

Quote:
Social Security: In 2019, 23 percent of the budget, or $1 trillion, paid for Social Security, which provided monthly retirement benefits averaging $1,503 to 45 million retired workers in December 2019. Social Security also provided benefits to 3 million spouses and children of retired workers, 6 million surviving children and spouses of deceased workers, and 10 million disabled workers and their eligible dependents in December 2019.

https://www.cbpp.org/research/federa...tax-dollars-go

Quote:
Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and marketplace subsidies: Four health insurance programs — Medicare, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace subsidies — together accounted for 25 percent of the budget in 2019, or $1.1 trillion. Nearly three-fifths of this amount, or $651 billion, went to Medicare, which provides health coverage to around 61 million people who are over age 65 or have disabilities. The rest of this category funds Medicaid, CHIP, and ACA subsidy and marketplace costs. In a typical month, Medicaid and CHIP provide health care or long-term care to about 82 million low-income children, parents, elderly people, and people with disabilities. (Both Medicaid and CHIP require matching payments from the states.) In 2019, 9.6 million of the 11.4 million people enrolled in health insurance through the ACA marketplace received subsidies that lower premiums and out-of-pocket costs, at an estimated cost of about $56 billion.

Quote:
Safety net programs: About 8 percent of the federal budget in 2019, or $361 billion, supported programs that provide aid (other than health insurance or Social Security benefits) to individuals and families facing hardship. Safety net programs include: the refundable portions of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit, which assist low- and moderate-income working families; programs that provide cash payments to eligible individuals or households, including Supplemental Security Income for the elderly or disabled poor and unemployment insurance; various forms of in-kind assistance for low-income people, including SNAP (food stamps), school meals, low-income housing assistance, child care assistance, and help meeting home energy bills; and various other programs such as those that aid abused or neglected children. Such programs keep millions of people out of poverty each year. A CBPP analysis using Census’ Supplemental Poverty Measure shows that government safety net programs kept 37 million people out of poverty in calendar year 2018. Without any government income assistance, either from safety net programs or other income supports like Social Security, the poverty rate would have been 24.0 percent in 2018, nearly double the actual 12.8 percent. And these programs reduced the depth of poverty for millions more, even when not bringing them above the poverty line.


The federal government dramatically increased spending on those at the bottom, starting in the 40's and continuing today, and the article you cited says economic inequality increased during that time. How is that possible? Not only that, the left wants to tax and spend more to "redistribute wealth"


I'm all for a safety net, but I'm under no illusion it's going to make the bottom richer, but will improve their standard/quality of life. I also know almost every dollar you give a poor person, they are eventually going to trade it to a rich person/company for a good or service, willingly and ethically, in almost all cases.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 09-24-2020 at 02:29 PM.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFlushDiamonds
Said with a drink in hand and steroids pulsing through his veins no doubt.
lol nope just a true believer. Plus like other jobs when you're the boss there's really no such thing as real time off. On a random Sunday hanging out watching football his phone is going pretty much non-stop, anything serious and it's leave immediately--showing up drunk isn't really an option.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
I believe that every right leaning poster's post is x% to be deemed ban or infraction worthy and it has nothing to do with what the post says and the only reason some right leaning posters have not been banned more is because of a small sample size. I haven't been able to figure out the exact number, but it is something like every 1,000th post made on 2+2 the algorithm believes is from a right leaning posters a mod is notified and it is up to them to come up with an excuse to give them a ban or infraction.

How else do you explain me getting a ban for victim blaming because I mentioned widely known facts about the case and explicitly said "I don't believe breonna deserved to die for any of this"?

/end of rant & sarcasm
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
First team breonna claimed she was killed while sleeping when the police entered without knocking or identified themselves. Then they said ok she wasn't sleeping - she was awake but in bed. Then the admitted her bf shot a police officer. Then she was in her bedroom in her underwear. Then they admitted the police knocked. In the next 2-3 weeks it will be released that she was wearing clothes that almost nobody regularly sleeps in and she was in the hallway. At court the info about her drug history will come out.

The have told so my lies that they have already contradicted or admitted were lies. They aren't done backtracking.

In saying that one of the police officers is about to get whacked for non breonna stuff (think in terms of inappropriate type of stuff with the opposite sex).
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
You are a little behind on your research. Team breonna has long said that the police didn't knock or announce who they were, but now they have admitted that the police knocked quite a few times. It is likely that they won't backtrack again until this goes to court, but don't worry the facts have a way of coming out in the courtroom.

If you don't believe me about her family admitting the police knocked please read the attorney for breonna's family statement where they admit the police knocked a lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
I have not read on any website that the was fired as an EMT because she stole drugs from an ambulance. I have never been to a white supremacist website so it may be out there - I don't know.

if you read a few articles about her case you will see that it is widely known that she was accepting packages delivered to her house for her ex bf who is a known drug dealer and was arrested within 24 or 48 hours of when the police showed up at breonna's door.

Keep in mind that a lot of articles omit details that make breonna look bad - the ESPN article written today about how kenny stills got arrested protesting breonna's death mention that police shot her serving a warrent at her house but made no mention of her bf shooting a police officer before the police shot.

I wouldn't say her involvement in illegal drugs is irrelevant since none of this would have happened if she wasn't involved in them. Is your stance that she was in no way involved in illegal drugs and the police showed up at her door randomly?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
I have not written one wild claim about breonna.



You can call it victim blaming if you want, but the fact is that if she wasn't involved in the sale of illegal drugs and if she wasn't standing next to her bf while he shot a police officer in the leg she wouldn't be dead. I wish she didn't do what she did and I wish her bf didn't do what he did. I am sure her bf feels horrible for his part in her death.



Hold on. Do you think the police showed up at her door for literally no reason? Like they just randomly picked a door?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
She did get fired as a EMT for stealing drugs from an ambulance and she was helping her ex sell drugs. Just wait for the facts to come out publicly.

She was not killed for being involved in the sale of illegal drugs. She was killed because she was standing next to her bf while he shot a police officer in the leg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
Breonna Taylor was involved in the illegal sale of drugs. This is not a lie and if that type of stuffs usually comes out in courts you will hear about it.

I believe the only thing that has been released publicly regarding her involvement in drugs so far is that she was accepting packages delivered to her house and giving them to her ex boyfriend who is a known drug dealer.



I am not a member of the KKK and I don't own a white hood. Reported this post because it is an insane personal attack.

I do not support protesters going to the private homes of politicians or judges to try to intimidate them.

I drove by (down the main road which is about a block from the AGs house) and there were police cars everywhere and the police seem to have given the protesters an insane amount of time to vacate the area.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
Thread seems to be slowly dying if we are about to go 20 posts deep about a joke that started when goofy posted something really stupid.

In other news BLM Louisville are still carrying on about Breonna Taylor and David Mcatee. If these are their 2 best examples of police brutality they are screwed at winning over the general public and the more and more they protest and disrupt peoples' lives the better it is for trump's odds in November. One of them was involved in the drug game and was shot after police returned fire after her bf (who she was standing next to) shot a cop and the other was shot by the national guard who were returning fire after he shot at them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
This is very simple. The police made a huge ****ing mistake and killed someone who did not deserve to die. End of discussion. The fact that bahbah focuses on Breonna Taylor and any possible notion that she's not ****ing perfect in every way is what led me to say "you sound like you think she deserved to die" and that is not ****ing projection. It's letting you know that in the midst of pretending you are somehow less biased and more impartial than the rest of us you actually look like an abject moron. bahbah pointing out anything negative regarding someone who died at the hands of a colossal ****up by the police. THE POLICE ****ED UP. They ****ed up. Why does he always go to bat for the police by seeking between the lines notions that Breonna Taylor was "no angel" and why, when Goofy and Wookie directly ask for citations so as to get to the TRUTH of the matter, do you instareply with your standard pretentious bullshit that they are ideologues who aren't interested in the truth WHEN THEY JUST ****ING ASKED FOR CITATIONS SO AS TO ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH?

bahbah says all this pretentious bullshit, huddles into this corner of level one, right wing talking point thinking, defends Trump ad nauseam. But of course he watches CNN and does not support Trump. He is the most frequent poster in the Trump thread!

You people are so full of yourselves and your woefully rigid thought that you don't even realize how stupid you sound
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
It is so, so depressing to watch people point at anything they can possibly find to justify (insert name here)'s death

Do you realize that you sound like you think Breonna Taylor deserved to die? You don't even afford her the same rights we all enjoy, innocent until proven guilty. No. She may have stolen drugs from work so **** her she gets to die

I mean it's just absolutely ****ing disgusting the way some of you posters talk. Every once in a while, one of these deaths reminds me of someone I know personally. When you get to be a part of a community, even for a few years, you see someone you know somewhere and you get a big smile when you see them randomly. Everyone has this experience. But imagine your friend made a few mistakes. Got caught up in some bullshit. Did something stupid, made trouble, derailed a path. A good path that can be refollowed with a little help. Or a break. A second chance...

...or the police just break down the ****ing door and empty the clip into your friend

You guys are ****ing terrible
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
Big LOL for whatever mod gave me a temp ban for "victim blaming" which is what I was accused of by sharing publicly known facts about breonna's case.

I said breonna was involved in the drug game because of the link that was shared here that had the transcripts of jail calls from those she was in business with telling others she was involved, her attorney acknowledged that she was not just an ex-gf to the known drug dealer the police were after (link previously provided), that the main drug dealer had packages delivered to her house that he would pick up then go straight to the trap house to drop it off (link previously provided) and the main drug dealer drove a car in her name while delivering drugs (link previously provided).

I also said she died in part because her bf shot a police officer and she was standing near him (something her bf admitted to publicly).

I directly said I don't think she deserved to die for what her and her bf did. I find it disgusting that mods and many posters here want to ignore all facts in the case for political reasons before any trial takes place and are willing to silence anyone who wants to talk about the facts. Nothing I said in this post or the one that got me banned was non-public info.
I think you should've been permanently banned years ago.

A lot of posters here should have been

In terms of "right wing" posters here, the only ones I have respect for are Howard Treesong and John21. The rest of you for the most part seem like clowns incapable of real, meaningful discussion

I can't believe I wasted so much time on this site. Two months have gone by and I see nothing has changed. You're all yelling at brick walls

The problem with right wing posters in general is that they are correct in hammering the point of personal responsibility, but that concept makes them wrong in terms of governing a country. There is a balance, a mix and context to every decision, law, interaction of police and citizen. The right simply does not know how to apply that balance evenly. The left doesn't really either, but they are not nearly as bad

What amazes me about 2+2 is the sheer inability to understand counterintuitive thinking. But I guess I should know better, 90% of poker players lose

Not understanding that there is more to it than simply just personal responsibility or herp derp don't commit crimes/follow orders you won't get shot is like continually claiming that folding is a losing play, or something that simple yet so profoundly wrong is actually the mentality one should hold for life, without even bothering to question its validity

Racial injustice doesn't get solved. It gets reduced. Every time you defend the police rather than concede they ****ed up, or blame Breonna Taylor for getting shot because apparently she's neck deep in some major drug operation, you make more permanent the lack of trust needed to bridge the gap

I have no reason to trust police if they're going to make a mistake and refuse to own up to it. To lie about events that transpire. To back fellow cops but not a person's rights. It is ****ed up that citizens do it, and deceive police and mean harm, but it is BEYOND ****ed up that police do it. They are supposed to be held to a higher standard and have my trust

I pay taxes so cops protect ME not each other. If I can't trust them, then the entire system is broken. And you sit there and defend it heavily...never at any moment truly speaking on this subject with a balance or impartiality...

You should've been banned when you were continually yapping about how Breonna Taylor was "involved in drugs" and refusing to provide even a single source but a vague mention of a friend you having "knowing things"

If that is OK for discourse here, then this forum is worthless and so are the posters and moderators here who perpetuate it. I used to come here to learn. Y'all somehow morphed into pure noise over the years and it's a shame
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GodgersWOAT
If drug game becomes legal, then drug runners will do something more lucrative. Maybe trafficking people idk, but it’s going to be worse than what they’re doing now most likely. Runners gonna run.
If drugs became legal, then the illegal industry would be forced to downsize or become non existent

Some of those "runners" would just become legit businesses paying taxes (assuming governance doesn't moronically tax too high which would drive them right back underground)

Some of those "runners" would get real jobs or real education to get real jobs

I dunno what you mean by runners gonna run, but I'm pretty sure the vast majority of people who sell **** like weed would probably make more money working a healthy number of hours at a ****ing Target. You can't make serious money selling drugs without discipline and intelligence

But that is neither here nor there...We have plenty of history and data to show clearly that what we are doing is not only wrong, but beyond ****ed up. If nothing else, police waste so much time, money, and resources on it that if districts were bars they'd belong on Bar Rescue (I know the show is fake but you get my point)

Colorado was the guinea pig and it is clear the rest of the country should have followed suit by now. This country is a monumentally corrupt joke that does not care about solving problems
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
With the information in the previous link in mind, check this out:











The federal government dramatically increased spending on those at the bottom, starting in the 40's and continuing today, and the article you cited says economic inequality increased during that time. How is that possible? Not only that, the left wants to tax and spend more to "redistribute wealth"


I'm all for a safety net, but I'm under no illusion it's going to make the bottom richer, but will improve their standard/quality of life. I also know almost every dollar you give a poor person, they are eventually going to trade it to a rich person/company for a good or service, willingly and ethically, in almost all cases.
I don't want to get in a tit-for-tat here.

Governments waste and bloat and are inefficient and corrupt. No doubt about that.

Governments are going to take lots of taxpayer money regardless of party. It is just going to happen. So the goal has to be to ensure that gov't spends that money on CITIZEN priorities. If you fight that, they will gladly give it all away to special interests.

So things like Medicaid, M4A, Social Security, Infrastructure and things that build the middleclass are far better than bloating the Military Complex and other areas like corporate subsidies, and especially those areas that put very little back in the economy.

America's success and growth post WW2 is largely attributed to the building of the MIddle Class. China's success and growth the last few decades has mirrored that as more and more people have moved from poverty to the middle class.

The tip back to gutting the middleclass to the benefit of the uber rich will provide short term gain to the uber rich but damage the country and middleclass badly thus making the long term wealth of the uber rich tougher. At least in America. But then as Uber rich maybe they do not care. They can just move.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 03:24 PM
TeflonDawg: Just be more like lily-white Colorado, LDO.

Also TeflonDawg: If selling drugs becomes less profitable, the drug dealers will just go to college and learn to code.

I love it.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
TeflonDawg: Just be more like lily-white Colorado, LDO.

Also TeflonDawg: If selling drugs becomes less profitable, the drug dealers will just go to college and learn to code.

I love it.
Way to demonstrate that you can't read
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg

In terms of "right wing" posters here, the only ones I have respect for are Howard Treesong and John21.
<-- banning_modbot: I did some fundraising for <em>(D)</em> Kyrsten Sinema-->
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wet work
lol nope just a true believer. Plus like other jobs when you're the boss there's really no such thing as real time off. On a random Sunday hanging out watching football his phone is going pretty much non-stop, anything serious and it's leave immediately--showing up drunk isn't really an option.
That's actually good to know about the drink.

R U sure about the roids though ?
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgiggity
repeating lies does not make them any more true
I haven't told any lies so it's all good
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
Every time you defend the police rather than concede they ****ed up, or blame Breonna Taylor for getting shot because apparently she's neck deep in some major drug operation, you make more permanent the lack of trust needed to bridge the gap
I am glad you said this, because I think this is why I was banned twice and given an infraction. You, like the mod who came down on me, are reading my posts as if I am saying Breonna was shot because she was involved in drugs. I said they showed up at her door because she was involved in drugs, but that wasn't why she got shot. What you will see in either the last or 2nd to last post before I got banned that I said was that she was shot because she was involved in drugs (that is the reason cops showed up to her house and the fact that she was involved in drugs is not my opinion, but the conclusion that the police, the judge that signed off on the warrant, the AG and nearly everyone else involved in the case came to) and because her bf shot a police officer after they entered her apartment and she was standing next to him (again, this is not my opinion, but the conclusion that the police and the AG came to).

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
I have no reason to trust police if they're going to make a mistake and refuse to own up to it. To lie about events that transpire. To back fellow cops but not a person's rights. It is ****ed up that citizens do it, and deceive police and mean harm, but it is BEYOND ****ed up that police do it. They are supposed to be held to a higher standard and have my trust

You should've been banned when you were continually yapping about how Breonna Taylor was "involved in drugs" and refusing to provide even a single source but a vague mention of a friend you having "knowing things
I think the police, at least in this case, did come clean and say they made a mistake and that is why one officer is facing jail time.

I did provide proof that she was involved with drugs. I said to click on the link ITT that had jail house transcripts and written notes from cops about the movement of her, the main drug dealer and others in group.

In conclusion, you are accusing me of 2 things I didn't do. Early on ITT I spoke of some non-public enough (some of which has come to light and other which hasn't yet), but nothing has been proven false. When I was asked to stop sharing non-public facts I did even though there is more that I know that nobody else ITT is likely to know.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Cops aren't black or white. They're blue, and they put that race above any other.
Earlier EADGBE stated- and not without merit imo- that some of Ben Shapiro's answers seem unsophisticated and precanned. Your blue comment sounds precanned also- Just a bit too pat. So I'm dismissing that.


Quote:
But don't let it be a black and a white one
'Cause they'll slam ya down to the street top
Black police showing out for the white cop
So you're a fan of anti Semites. Very strange for a far leftist...
https://www.billboard.com/articles/c...iracy-theories
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
I am glad you said this, because I think this is why I was banned twice and given an infraction. You, like the mod who came down on me, are reading my posts as if I am saying Breonna was shot because she was involved in drugs. I said they showed up at her door because she was involved in drugs, but that wasn't why she got shot. What you will see in either the last or 2nd to last post before I got banned that I said was that she was shot because she was involved in drugs (that is the reason cops showed up to her house and the fact that she was involved in drugs is not my opinion, but the conclusion that the police, the judge that signed off on the warrant, the AG and nearly everyone else involved in the case came to) and because her bf shot a police officer after they entered her apartment and she was standing next to him (again, this is not my opinion, but the conclusion that the police and the AG came to).



I think the police, at least in this case, did come clean and say they made a mistake and that is why one officer is facing jail time.

I did provide proof that she was involved with drugs. I said to click on the link ITT that had jail house transcripts and written notes from cops about the movement of her, the main drug dealer and others in group.

In conclusion, you are accusing me of 2 things I didn't do. Early on ITT I spoke of some non-public enough (some of which has come to light and other which hasn't yet), but nothing has been proven false. When I was asked to stop sharing non-public facts I did even though there is more that I know that nobody else ITT is likely to know.
bahbah's back and still posting his lies, yay.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
TeflonDawg: Just be more like lily-white Colorado, LDO.

Also TeflonDawg: If selling drugs becomes less profitable, the drug dealers will just go to college and learn to code.

I love it.
See, posts like these are why you have no value in a discussion

You're being dishonest and mischaracterizing what I said, and even worse, feel good and righteous about it. You're just full of **** and have revealed that ignorance for your entirety of posting on here and Unstuck. You're a clown and exactly what's wrong with America

I have repeatedly explained to you that your attitude is the problem. YOU are the problem. The laws need to change, and the people will follow suit

But you don't want to talk about that. You want to take my post and twist it into some bullshit intellectually dishonest meme like retort

Change your attitude and be willing to help the problem not hurt. You and every other poster who likes what you have to say. You are not wrong when you complain about some things, you are wrong about the depth and breadth of which you complain about. It doesn't just end at where you point the finger, dude, it goes beyond that and as I've said now for years, these are 20-50 years problems not 4. So either be willing to dig deep or stfu and stay out of the convo, because all you do is spew noise nobody needs to hear
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFlushDiamonds
That's actually good to know about the drink.

R U sure about the roids though ?
With that specific person? Ya pretty sure.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey
I am glad you said this, because I think this is why I was banned twice and given an infraction. You, like the mod who came down on me, are reading my posts as if I am saying Breonna was shot because she was involved in drugs. I said they showed up at her door because she was involved in drugs, but that wasn't why she got shot. What you will see in either the last or 2nd to last post before I got banned that I said was that she was shot because she was involved in drugs (that is the reason cops showed up to her house and the fact that she was involved in drugs is not my opinion, but the conclusion that the police, the judge that signed off on the warrant, the AG and nearly everyone else involved in the case came to) and because her bf shot a police officer after they entered her apartment and she was standing next to him (again, this is not my opinion, but the conclusion that the police and the AG came to).



I think the police, at least in this case, did come clean and say they made a mistake and that is why one officer is facing jail time.

I did provide proof that she was involved with drugs. I said to click on the link ITT that had jail house transcripts and written notes from cops about the movement of her, the main drug dealer and others in group.

In conclusion, you are accusing me of 2 things I didn't do. Early on ITT I spoke of some non-public enough (some of which has come to light and other which hasn't yet), but nothing has been proven false. When I was asked to stop sharing non-public facts I did even though there is more that I know that nobody else ITT is likely to know.
You STILL don't get it

Breonna Taylor has RIGHTS

You talk about her like she has none

You talk about all her "she's no angel" evidence

And at the time, you spewed all that **** WITH NO CITES. You literally spent time trying to tell us "how criminal she is" on pure speculation. It doesn't matter if it was revealed that she's the ****ing criminal mastermind. The whole point is you didn't care to wait. All you wanted to do was keep talking about all the things that apparently in your mind justify her DEATH

You DO NOT talk about her like she's a human being who has the same rights afforded to ALL of us

It's just so amazing to me how so many people can't see it like I can. Maybe it's because I'm a minority too and have watched cops **** with people, my friends and my family, all while *******s like bahbah yap on the internet about how they were all "doing something wrong" get the **** out of here

Some of the things you said in those posts were flat out lies, bro, and you're still allowed to post here? lol this site is a joke

This is what this thread is reduced to. Noise, where I have to explain basic **** to you instead of have a real conversation about how to reduce police brutality, increase public trust, and just make a cop's job easier all around, subsequently reducing the frequency of interaction with citizens who, you know, would like to sleep in bed without getting shot to death by a bunch of incompetent ****ing cops and then getting a slap on the wrist in the process

They get to see their families. Taylor does not.

But you don't care about that. You care that she did things that are illegal and give the benefit of the doubt to the very institutions who, instead of just admitting they ****ed up, tried to smear her just to save face

And white people expect me to trust the police. How???
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
You literally spent time trying to tell us "how criminal she is" on pure speculation
Except it's not pure speculation, there is actual evidence that she was involved in the trafficking enterprise. Not as a key player or anything, that is why she was a low value target, and that is why the cops chose to knock, but she wasn't an innocent bystander. She was part of the game.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayingGamble
Except it's not pure speculation, there is actual evidence that she was involved in the trafficking enterprise. Not as a key player or anything, that is why she was a low value target, and that is why the cops chose to knock, but she wasn't an innocent bystander. She was part of the game.
No, there's not actual evidence. No, they didn't knock. Lies lies lies.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
No, there's not actual evidence. No, they didn't knock. Lies lies lies.

Believe it or not, but the police don't just go busting down random doors in the middle of the night. They got a warrant to search her apartment, ergo there was evidence that she was involved in the drug trafficking ring. Why else were they there? Just for fun? What other motive would they have for doing the raid?
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayingGamble
Believe it or not, but the police don't just go busting down random doors in the middle of the night. They got a warrant to search her apartment, ergo there was evidence that she was involved in the drug trafficking ring. Why else were they there? Just for fun? What other motive would they have for doing the raid?
They were targeting Glover, and they knew he had received packages at Taylor's place.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote
09-24-2020 , 07:21 PM
13 out of 14 witnesses said there was no knock.

Guess which 1 witness is the only one right wingers pretend exists.
Police brutality and police reform (US) Quote

      
m