Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Rococo has a long history of being very precise with his language in this forum. When he says it's an "undisputed fact" that "The DA stated that the office believed that the confessor likely acted alone.", I expect that's precisely what he means. And that makes far more sense than Rococo implying it's an undisputed fact that Reyes acted alone, as it's quite clear just from this thread alone that it's not undisputed.
If anyone's playing word games here, it's you. But hopefully instead it's just a case of you misinterpreting Rococo's intent.
I don't play word games.
That said, I'm not overtly familiar with Rococo's posting history so yeah maybe I misinterpreted by conflating what he said with what I inferred from him - rightly or wrongly- as actually meaning. The DA
believing Reyes most likely acted alone disregards the medical evidence for multiple attackers and the fact that one pf the CP5 confessed from prison to his friend that he sexually assaulted Trisha Meili and another very strongly implied he also took part in actual rape, to a cop, by laughing "I already got mine" simply when the cop asked him why he wasn't out with his girlfriend- even if a new DA moots a subjective opinion. That's what I had issue with, but again conflated what Roc said with what I thought he meant. I do think however the onus is indeed on trolly to provide evidence they were "blatantly railroaded" as a flawed due process doesn't necessarily equate to that. Also, if trolly is making the assertion that "They did not rape that woman"- who he doesn't even bother to name- he needs to address these points, even if it's an undisputed fact that an unreliable source such as Reyes confessed to acting alone and an undisputed fact that the DA who didn't take part in the investigation at the time, expressed a belief which flew in the face of medical evidence.