Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
My post here was not made to critique another poster; it was made to critique you (and the general pattern of moderation here not seeming evenhanded). [
When you said Victor poisons every thresd he posts in it sounded like a critique of another poster to me.
Quote:
I just don't get that you clearly see a blatant violation on a first post back from a ban, so much that you feel the need to comment on it, but it doesn't result in an immediate longer ban.
It's OK that you don't get it. And mods arent going to justify every decision we make just because a poster doesnt agree with it. For example, if I banned everyone who Ive received a pm from another poster telling me I should ban this guy or that, there would be almost no one left.
Quote:
I know you made a long post about the baby murder thing, but it was so long and complicated that I have forgotten anything I may have understood from reading it. I really think that the post Luciom replied to is the worst post I have seen here in a long time. Not only did make baseless horrible allegations but it had no content apart from those allegations. If that kind of thing is allowed I don't know how any other ad hominem attack could be prohibited.
I guess long is a relative term that depends on ones reading speed and attention span. And complicated is relative to reading comprehension. It's likely you didnt understand it or you wouldnt be asking about it again, so here is the abridged version:
Israel is deliberately dropping bombs on locations they know contain civilians and babies. Those civilians and babies are being killed by the thousands. Therefore, if you support Israel you support deliberately killing babies. It's the same with the genocide supporter issue. Whether or not it is genocide is being debated around the world right now. So if Israel is conducting a genocide, and you support Israel, then you support genocide. Don't like the sound of that? Then make your case as to why that logic is flawed in the topic thread. Dont expect a mod to refute it for you or punish someone for that opinion.
Quote:
The posts suggesting I kill myself were not very recent and I would have no idea how to find them.
One was from the guy who was eventually banned for talking about idolizing murderers. Another example of someone terrible for the forum who was allowed to poison it far too long.
So you just threw that in for dramatic effect, unsure if it even occurred since I returned to modding and it turns out it was done by a poster I permabanned.
In case this post is also too long and complicated for you to follow:
Mods arent going to justify their actions. We get paid (not really) to make those judgement calls in gray areas. If you feel so strongly that a mods actions are so wrong that they warrant review by the higher ups, post that in ATF. If it's just a case of the mod not doing what you would have done if you were a mod, then volunteer to be a mod so you can do it yourself or just accept that each mod makes decisions differently from each other and from how posters would do it.