Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Moderation Discussion Thread (And I hear him every night, On every street) The Moderation Discussion Thread (And I hear him every night, On every street)

09-21-2020 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
How would we know?

To me, I see no value to him posting someone's suspected Twitter account, other than to discredit/embarrass a poster. It's not like Goofy used that Twitter account to discredit any specific argument avval was making.

It is my experience people who do that will stop at nothing to continue to do that. This is the type of stuff people do and can get people fired. Simply because somebody's political positions and support is unpopular.

Goofy's claims of him not caring is contradicted by him actually caring enough to post somebody's Twitter account without their permission. Even if goofy wouldn't go that far, who is to say one of the idiots here wouldn't use that Twitter account goofy provided to try and find out who Avval is, especially if they think he is a "shitty person", and deserves "consequences".


This really has nothing to do with the Avval, but everything to do with goofy's behavior.
Ooh, ooh, I want to play. Am I "someone"?
09-21-2020 , 10:04 PM
So, wait, just so we got this straight - I am a militant nutcase who will hunt deplorables down to the ends of the earth to make them face "consequences", but I need goofy to point out this particular deplorable's twitter handle, which he found by searching for his 2+2 account name, so that I can spring into action and activate the strategy.

Have I got this about right?
09-21-2020 , 10:07 PM
How would I know?
09-21-2020 , 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula72
Is it even 100% certain that it is him? I get the exact name but there are a lot of degenerate ****s who impersonate people - usually those they don't like.
Avwal needs to come on here and confirm because otherwise seems like an inappropriate linkage between the 2 in the first place to get Goofy out of hot water for this one. I mean unless a user is promoting their twitter feed we shouldn't go ahead and link the 2 until then.
09-21-2020 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Fair enough.
<several hours of going more and more insane passes>

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
How would we know?

To me, I see no value to him posting someone's suspected Twitter account, other than to discredit/embarrass a poster. It's not like Goofy used that Twitter account to discredit any specific argument avval was making.

It is my experience people who do that will stop at nothing to continue to do that. This is the type of stuff people do and can get people fired. Simply because somebody's political positions and support is unpopular.

Goofy's claims of him not caring is contradicted by him actually caring enough to post somebody's Twitter account without their permission. Even if goofy wouldn't go that far, who is to say one of the idiots here wouldn't use that Twitter account goofy provided to try and find out who Avval is, especially if they think he is a "shitty person", and deserves "consequences".


This really has nothing to do with Avval, but everything to do with goofy's behavior. I mean, do we really want to start posting online information outside of 2 + 2 that will embarrass people?

Where has that led before?
lol wow
09-21-2020 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
People talk about liberals being snowflakes and crying over participation trophies - I'm old enough to remember DVaut digging up ikestoys' blog (which did have personal information, and was not located at twitter.com/ikestoys) that showed him lying on 2+2 about who he voted for for MI Senate or governor or something.



Fast forward a dozen years and IHIV's crying about this weak ****. Kids and their participation trophies these days!
Can anyone remember how Rapini was de-modded?
09-21-2020 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Even going to Google and searching for that would involve me caring significantly more than I do. Someone on Unstuck did that.
I wouldn't use the standards of conduct on unstuck as a yardstick about what should go on in here.
09-22-2020 , 09:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
How would we know?
We know because the powers that be around here would have said something if goofy in fact had access to private user information. They are not sympathetic to goofy's politics. I highly doubt they would cover for him if he abused access.

Quote:
To me, I see no value to him posting someone's suspected Twitter account, other than to discredit/embarrass a poster. It's not like Goofy used that Twitter account to discredit any specific argument avval was making.

It is my experience people who do that will stop at nothing to continue to do that. This is the type of stuff people do and can get people fired. Simply because somebody's political positions and support is unpopular.

Goofy's claims of him not caring is contradicted by him actually caring enough to post somebody's Twitter account without their permission. Even if goofy wouldn't go that far, who is to say one of the idiots here wouldn't use that Twitter account goofy provided to try and find out who Avval is, especially if they think he is a "shitty person", and deserves "consequences".


This really has nothing to do with Avval, but everything to do with goofy's behavior. I mean, do we really want to start posting online information outside of 2 + 2 that will embarrass people?

Where has that led before?
I haven't ever doxxed anyone, and I probably wouldn't. But keep in mind that this is the mildest sort of doxxing. If awval cared that much, I'm sure he wouldn't have had a Twitter account with the same handle.

And this isn't a case where the Twitter account contained a bunch of videos of awval dancing around in his underwear. I looked at it for 30 seconds, and it seemed reasonably consistent with his posting here -- a little Trumpier for sure but not by an order of magnitude.
09-22-2020 , 12:47 PM
Well, let's see if anything new developments shed some light on whether IHIV's posts in this thread were based on a real concern for the sanctity of "doxxing" or if he was just making up some bullshit to cry to teacher because he reaaaaaally hates liberals, shall we?

And with that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Google goofyballer and twitter.
LOL! IHIV is telling people to go dig up a picture of me and my real first name! Surely this is a massive escalation in violation of privacy and all the terrible actions he described here, yes?

(jk go read twitter.com/goofyballer all you want, I used to make good Starcraft gifs)

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
How would we know?

To me, I see no value to him posting someone's suspected Twitter account, other than to discredit/embarrass a poster. It's not like Goofy used that Twitter account to discredit any specific argument avval was making.

It is my experience people who do that will stop at nothing to continue to do that. This is the type of stuff people do and can get people fired. Simply because somebody's political positions and support is unpopular.

Goofy's claims of him not caring is contradicted by him actually caring enough to post somebody's Twitter account without their permission. Even if goofy wouldn't go that far, who is to say one of the idiots here wouldn't use that Twitter account goofy provided to try and find out who Avval is, especially if they think he is a "shitty person", and deserves "consequences".


This really has nothing to do with Avval, but everything to do with goofy's behavior. I mean, do we really want to start posting online information outside of 2 + 2 that will embarrass people?


Where has that led before?
All this bleating about principles and he goes and does the exact same thing he decried, lol. Never go full HIV, it only ends in AIDS
09-22-2020 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Well, let's see if anything new developments shed some light on whether IHIV's posts in this thread were based on a real concern for the sanctity of "doxxing" or if he was just making up some bullshit to cry to teacher because he reaaaaaally hates liberals, shall we?

And with that:



LOL! IHIV is telling people to go dig up a picture of me and my real first name! Surely this is a massive escalation in violation of privacy and all the terrible actions he described here, yes?

(jk go read twitter.com/goofyballer all you want, I used to make good Starcraft gifs)



All this bleating about principles and he goes and does the exact same thing he decried, lol. Never go full HIV, it only ends in AIDS
Apparently it's not a concern of the moderators here. So, if you are going to post people's twitter accounts, I think it's only fair yours is posted. I don't want it to be this way, but apparently you do.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 09-22-2020 at 12:57 PM. Reason: tit for tat, right?
09-22-2020 , 01:18 PM
Sorry sorry I can't hear any of that over the sound of you arguing that you've just committed a cardinal sin:

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
To me, I see no value to him posting someone's suspected Twitter account, other than to discredit/embarrass a poster. It's not like Goofy IHIV used that Twitter account to discredit any specific argument avval was making.

It is my experience people who do that will stop at nothing to continue to do that. This is the type of stuff people do and can get people fired. Simply because somebody's political positions and support is unpopular.

Goofy IHIV's claims of him not caring is contradicted by him actually caring enough to post somebody's Twitter account without their permission. Even if goofy IHIV wouldn't go that far, who is to say one of the idiots here wouldn't use that Twitter account goofy IHIV provided to try and find out who Avval is, especially if they think he is a "shitty person", and deserves "consequences".


This really has nothing to do with Avval, but everything to do with goofy IHIV's behavior. I mean, do we really want to start posting online information outside of 2 + 2 that will embarrass people?

Where has that led before?
😂
09-22-2020 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Sorry sorry I can't hear any of that over the sound of you arguing that you've just committed a cardinal sin:



😂
I think I really put the shits up him with the "consequences for being a shitty person" thing.
09-22-2020 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Apparently it's not a concern of the moderators here. So, if you are going to post people's twitter accounts, I think it's only fair yours is posted. I don't want it to be this way, but apparently you do.
Goofy is going to pretend to misunderstand you saying 'if it's ok for you to do then it should be done to you' as not just making the point that's it's not a great thing to do

It's am obvious defensive play but hopefully he will think twice before doing it in future. If posters twitters are linked then eventually it will be one with doxing info - best just not to do it without permission.
09-22-2020 , 01:56 PM
JFC people, the guy used the same handle on twitter as his user name here. What is so ****ing hard to understand about that?
09-22-2020 , 01:59 PM
So what.
09-22-2020 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
So what.
So it's not doxxing in any way, shape, or form. You have an online presence. If you choose to use the same user name online for multiple public facing web sites, that's an invitation to be linked. It's like if I used this user name to post on unstuck or something, and some kindly soul decided to quote my posts from there over here. Remember when something like that happened, chez?
09-25-2020 , 10:38 AM
*************************************

Announcement:


Spoiler:



bahbahmickey exiled 6 months




*************************************
09-25-2020 , 11:09 AM
09-25-2020 , 03:01 PM
Spoiler:
I, for one, am confident that bahbah will use the time away for some thoughtful introspection and will come back an improved poster.


edit in the Spoil in order to save The Wook's reputation.

Last edited by King Spew; 09-25-2020 at 03:08 PM.
09-25-2020 , 06:41 PM
Good lord, what have I missed??
10-02-2020 , 07:43 AM
I think if a mod is going to talk **** to someone, they shouldn't ban someone for talking **** back.
10-02-2020 , 07:55 AM
Link?
10-02-2020 , 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
I think if a mod is going to talk **** to someone, they shouldn't ban someone for talking **** back.
el oh el
10-02-2020 , 11:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
I think if Trump is going to talk **** to someone, he shouldn't talk loudly over the other person for talking **** back.
FYP
10-02-2020 , 01:31 PM
I posted about the Antifa question in which the moderator and Biden deflected to white supremacy....as you can see here my post had nothing to do with Trump, but rather Biden and Wallace deflecting to white supremcy, but of course the only response the #toxiccult has is "but trump" along with **** talking):

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
You must have missed it. The initial question was to Biden about antifa and Biden brought up white supremacy and whatnot, then Wallace challenge Trump, in which he was not very clear whether he wanted to condemn them, or tell them to stop interfering in these protests, after Trump asked Wallace which group he wanted to condemn and Wallace brought up proud boys, he also never went back to Biden to ask him about antifa, or left-wing extremism.

Biden never condemned antifa or any of the left-wing extremism that's going on in Portland OR Seattle.
Here is the mod's response:




Quote:
Originally Posted by EADGBE
You’re twisting yourself in knots trying to defend Trump being unwilling to call out white supremacists (as he has been in the past).

Just stop, you are embarassing yourself.

He banned me for my response to this where I told him what to suck. I'd repost but he'd probably ban me again.

If he is going to talk ****, he need to be able to take it, but he can't, he banned me for talking **** back at him. I guess the nature of my **** talk was not appealing to him. He could not justify his decision to temp ban me.

      
m