Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
The Holtzclaw case looked super shady given that there was.... you know...no actual evidence against him besides the testimony of crack heads.
A) As in the testimony of crackheads which withstood defence cross to the jury's satisfaction
B) Not all testimony was by crackheads
C) Witnesses and victims come from all walks of life, even crackheads and I hope you're never on a jury if a sex worker is raped, if your comments re addicts are anything to go by.
Anyway I only mentioned rapey boy as washoe specifically mentioned transcripts as proof while not accepting such proof in another instance, so let's not derail the thread.