Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
It's not at all clear to me that halting international travel was the most important action. I mean, just given that it's clear from how the disease has spread that the US banning travel from one country was completely ineffective, because of international travel between other countries. China stopping outbound international travel early enough might have worked better, but given how unlikely it seems that we were ever going to react quickly enough to stop the spread just via simple international travel bans it also seems to me that other measures were always going to be necessary and more important, and it would have been really useful to start taking some of them sooner.
Bearing in mind that I think this was going to be a pandemic no matter who was president at the time, and always going to be bad in the US. It's hard to say just how much better it could have been. I just don't buy the argument that the very limited travel ban is evidence of a sufficient or well planned response. It doesn't really seem like either.
This may not be the dumbest take possible but its probably the "wrongest"
The virus originated in china. It is not transmitted or spread through bird migration, wind, or some ****. It's also not crossing the ocean by rail, whale or even ship in large numbers. Cruise ships in small numbers which are easy to detect, track, and contain if you're trying
People are modeling the effects of exponential growth. Its not rocket surgery. Imagine moving the effectiveness of self isolation one step further and eliminating a significant portion of seeds. We could make a list of things from temperature/season, observing china, canada, and europe, drugs/treatment, vaccines, equipment/ventalators etc that all benefit greatly from more time
Minimizing or dismissing the restriction of air travel from china and to a lesser extent europe is so wrong I'm temped to quote makrssman but I suspect I am subject to my own set of rules