No if the state becomes undemocratic, if the constitution becomes toilet paper and so on, violent political action isn't Marxist as I wrote repeatedly and you seemed to acknowledge.

You can have Marxist v Marxist confrontations but that would require other elements to call the group Marxist.

For ex china and Vietnam had a war in 1979

Plenty people regardless of their social class are anti immigration. An anti immigration stance is essentially based on ethno tribalism, again at its core.

Right. Anyone or group regardless of their ideology are marxist as soon as they resort to or advocate violence, due to Marxism also advocating violence. Which means all violent riots/groups/people are marxists. Not that Marxism isn't the only ideology that advocates violence, it's that all groups are Marxist instead...

Or maybe (and just run with me on this one for a minute), Marxism isn't the only ideology that thinks violence is justified.

Right. There is also Leninism, Stalinism, and Maoism.

It is not moral because you may have enticed a drunk and/or desperate, usually law abiding, citizen to do something bad in a moment of weakness on a late Saturday night.

But what if you lived in a town that has recently been terrorized by a band of home invaders that sometimes killed their victims? Is planning a similar sting with some buddies immoral if we assume that your money flashing in a public place will entice those pros only to enter your house with guns, and if you don't flesh them out and eliminate them, they will continue their crimes? (I realize that the police themselves would probably set something like this up. I just want to make sure that you agree that if they refused to, your life saving action would not be immoral).

(

Good boy, you are getting it

In vino veritas David, you don't become a robber while drunk if you aren't one inside. I have been drunk many times and I guess many people on this forum did as well and I don't think we ever robbed anyone in that state

do you think the government can set people up and entice them to lie under questioning?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-68810428

Australia is going to need to ban knives next.

Terrible, but imagine how many more people he could have killed with an automatic rifle.

Do malls there not have security guards? Seems like two guards with bats could have taken the guy down quickly.

If the trend catches on for a lack of readily available firearms, we'll need you to defend against any restrictions to an armed militia - whether that be nuke or Swiss Army knive - and advocate instead for mental health 'measures.'

Lord knows, that's in full swing.

And with what measure you mete... it shall be measured to you again.

Inconceivable, yo

There was clearly none nearby, neither any capable men. Unfortunately

Get behind me, Satan, with that post number.

What about a few gallons of gasoline?

What about cars?

He could have driven a hundred miles or so?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Luciom: Marxists should all be shot.

Also Luciom: Everyone who advocates for political violence is a Marxist.