I obviously know what the term means. I don't know what are referring to as a false dichotomy.

Okay, I'll bite. What type of data analysis skills are used in quantum physics and when are they required?

a) Immediate existential threat
b) No warming due to human beings

If "overwhelming majority" do not believe (b) they do not necessarily believe (a). Clauser's point is the hype around the "existential threat" is faked. This does not equate to 'climate change denial', which is a blunt tool against a man of his calibre that he cannot pass what is essentially GCSE geography in interpreting climate data.

Where did I claim that Clauser believed that humans were having no impact at all on the climate?

An attempt to read a paper by Clauser, Zeilinger et al will demonstrate the level of statistical analysis required. As opposed to interpreting a line graph.

You said I disbelieve the overwhelming majority of climate scientists and others, but believe Clauser, implying the overwhelming majority believe in immediate existential threat. But they do not. There is a range of opinion, some influenced monetarily as funding trails show. The extent to which Clauser believes human beings influence climate is non-zero, but negligible.

How does climate work on a flat Earth? Do the clouds and other weather fall off the edges? Thanks in advance.

All the best.

The overwhelming majority of climatologists (and non-climatologists) do believe that action should be taken now to address human impact on the climate. What is your basis for believing otherwise?

Yup .
The science saying climate change isn’t a thing represent like 0.03 of all science papers .

So in one instance covid at less than 1% death rate is meaningless , no need vaccine (or the chance of dying from a vaccine is les then 1% )
Switch to climate changes with less than 1% of paper says climate changes is mostly natural and non dangerous , and that same % percentage that was meaningless for covid becomes the holy grail of truth in climate changes….

Makes no sense to me how they think science works like that .

I am not questioning the brilliance of John Clause in the field of theoretical quantum physics. I was completely unaware that such a field uses mass data and data analysis. Your non-answer makes me believe this field doesn't actually involve data analysis.

Seems like your argument is that because he is smart in one area he must be smart in all areas, or at least the area you agree with his opinion on climate change.

So, if he does not regularly engage in mass data analysis, what expertise would he have in a field where data analysis is an integral feature of the work the experts perform?

I know a great electrician guy .
Probably I will ask for knee surgery from him soon .

It's not really called quantum mechanics (that's so general as to be useless as it essentially describes 90% of modern physics research) but experimental high energy/particle physics is one of the most data intensive research fields you can go into. But it's quite different I imagine, from the data analysis climate scientists need to do. Not that there is any difference between what climate scientists and the high energy physics community think about climate change.

I think Donald Trump knows the muffin man.

There is little point in citing the information. It is available, you are presumably aware of it, and you choose to ignore it.

There is no science saying anything about this. Where is the experiment?

Line graphs tho. Climate change (as in the existential crisis) is debunked with a level of acumen most ordinary people are capable of.

There is obviously a difference with the guy in question, presumably he is not part of "the community", or "the groupthink" perhaps.

Fringe conspiracy until it wasn't.

Roundup, Montesanto bought scientist and institutions.

Donald trump could walk down drury lane, shoot someone, and he wouldn't lose any voters. It's incredible.

It's not the world that is this simple.

https://www.mindthegap.ngo/harmful-s...ing%20research.

Sorry for the derail.

You have to be in the community and you can't speak against the consensus, yeah. or you get blackmailed and your funding gets frozen. look for honest scientists who tell you exactly that.

[QUOTE=Montrealcorp;58240353]https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...ent%20accurate.

Here one example

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/1...D%20IOPscience

“ Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature - IOPscience”

“ From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. ”

That’s the side you are one .
4 reviewed! papers on 3000 .

You will never hear about that again in the media, just like the Paradise, CA fire, and the toxic train derailment in OH. I have first hand information (there's also a lot of testimony to this on yt) that there's upwards of 2K children missing and unaccounted for, and still no explanation given regarding why they trapped people to their deaths. Eric West, the realtor who was able to broadcast live from there in the aftermath with his Starlink Satellite system was arrested for "violating an emergency proclamation" by showing video and pictures of the damage and he has to appear in court next month.

They also refuse to cover the real news about all the evidence coming out against Biden being bought out by outside foreign influences. Not one peep, but the media is programming everyone to believe Trump's issues are much more serious than a country and world being taken over by a communistic foreign influence (with evidence). This is how communism works, they take control of the media.

The east Palestine train wreck and lawsuit is in the news every day here, so, as usual, you don’t know wtfyata.