Welcome back Monte. I saw you took a self-imposed week long holiday.

I expect I will do a longer one later today. Reality is that the riggies/conspiracyderps here are not particularly interesting in the end, as they all pretty much parrot routine derpy content which they passively consume. Not much creativity other than at times washoe (when he goes full washoe mode). Even the Qderp is passing through routine stuff for that ultra fringy crowd.

One question I have asked a few of them, but none answer is when do they give up on the whole Trumpderp groupthink. I get how Trump empowered and enabled them, and I also get how those that create content leaped at the chance to monetize these passive consumers, but they have lost/underperformed in many election cycles now, so do they even care that their approach keeps losing? I genuinely am not sure on that, and much like how Lucky will not directly answer any question - they as a group avoid talking about how they drag down their team over and over and over.

I was a bit wrong in I genuinely thought after Trump lost an easy to win re-election in 2020 that his derps would move on. They did not, and they cost the Republicans the Senate in 2022 as they put up megaderps like Herchel Walker that could not get elected even in easy races. Even after that they have stayed loyal, so will another loss due to them in 2024 change that? No idea at this point and they aint sharing why they remain passively loyal, so I guess that will remain a mystery and I will continue to thank them for how they sabotage their own agendas.

The other area that perhaps you can broach with them is their belief or lack of belief in religion. I know your opinion on that, but I admit I do not have a clear read on the conspiracyderps in this regard. They hate science, but do they actually like religion? Not sure, and perhaps you can crack their code on that one! Congrats if you do.

Lol. Sounds like I have been deputised to carry on your good work. Big shoes to fill.

I think I'll start my practice routine by saying "All the best" out loud in the most condescending tone possible.

You know you got there when rando riggies/derps follow you around and continue forgettable conversations from months or years ago as if you should remember them like they remember you. Just shows the power of some impactful messaging where even a few simple words like "All the best" or "derp" linger with them (and often cause them to mimic it which to them is being creative). Left to their own devices with regard to marketing/slogans they usually come up with gems like vaccine fundamentalists. Kind of why nearly all of them are passive consumers, but once in a while they can be a source of legit entertainment, and they keep forcing losses in elections for candidates that support their beliefs, so they have a functional purpose as well.

All the best!

didnt think that was made up

can you define acceleration pls

As a mathematical construct, in the context of Newtonian mechanics, in the context of general relativity, or as used colloquially?

I'm pretty sure you can look up the definition of acceleration on the same internet that you are using to post on this forum.

Im pretty sure every person that has used a computer did not need you to explain to them how a search engine works.

Apparently you did.

Nonetheless, just in case: https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=acceleration+definition.

He didn't explain how google works (which would actually be interesting), he suggested (optimistically) that you could use this incredible technology on your own.

Dude probably still uses Yahoo and has a hotmail address.

What's wrong with having a Hotmail address?

Nothing, if you're over 70. Otherwise, get with the times, man.

I'm still using aol. Hotmail always seemed to be the email of all the extroverted chicks.

I have a Gmail address too obviously but I like my Hotmail address and it's my main email.

Time for a cup of warm milk and your nap, grandpa.

My aol account hasn't broken down yet so I don't need to replace it. I'm younger than you.

Ouch. Well, not in spirit, gramps.

It's the first antiderivative of jerk.

"microwave" weapons is simply an analogy for how some directed energy weapons (for which patents exist increasingly publicly) work to target specific materials in an unconventional way. A reading of Judy Wood's textbook 'Where did the towers go?' about 9/11 demonstrates how DEW were used that day. Events happening since (Lebanon for instance, and perhaps the event in question) suggest an objective of 9/11 was to showcase the availability and functionality of DEWs. Using such weapons to promote "the climate crisis" (which Nobel physics winner Clauser has stated is fake, if there is any doubt) seems a reasonable assertion.

Judy Woods's book is amazing. A real eye opener.

Do PHDs in all disciplines make you an expert in climatology?

That depends on your stance on climate change. If you believe the climate crisis is a hoax, then a PhD and/or Nobel Prize makes you an expert regardless of the field. And all the PhDs and Nobel Prize winners in directly relevant fields that believe there is a climate crisis are of course to be dismissed.

It seems 9/11 did use the same technology, you can see it from the melted cars and fire engine that were blocks away from the main towers, I'm pretty sure it was mentioned on Judy Wood's book (those Towers were literally turned into powder, how people can't see that is beyond mind-boggling).

All the houses that burned in Hawaii also turned into a white powder. If you look at pictures from drones before they close the airspace all you can see is homes turned into white ash with hardly any black, with all the trees still standing in green. We're in a war against an evil empire that's trying to control the world. People can put their head in the sand if they don't wanna hear that.

This guy did a very good analysis that more than proves those fires were not natural. It goes beyond science as we know it.


https://youtu.be/Bs3o3z0G8tw?si=Jt0J0uqQF3Gd9FDf