facts bro. it dont matter who says it- youd defend your sibling too.

Again even if all the above is true, its not cancel culture.

not white, half asian. and this is a big but here.


its no coincidence michelle malkin is defending here and a couple other asians.

Just because someone says something on the internet [ ] facts.

This is something you really really struggle with.

You accept so much you read and see on the internet as gospel truth.

you guys saying malkin is a crazy whore becuase she supported trump is not an example of cancel culure??? give me a break pal!


also stop gaslighting!!!

What the **** are you talking about?

Im talking about what happened in this conviction.

Its not cancel culture, you are just using the term in a really broad inexact way because its kinda in the same ball park.

That's assuming anything you say is true, which given your track record is highly improbable.

everything I said is true! do your own research, double check and find me ONE THING i said NOT TRUE!


I DARE U!!

The Supreme Court already did that.

9 pussy jurors did that, as with OJ it was bad!

The Supreme Court is not nine pussy jurors.

what is it then? It was 9 jurors who f up here let me tell you...


you will learn the truth eventually and hopefully apologize to me.


here it was him and 8 more donks from the streets-

You understand that there is an appeals process in the USA?

I do and its very faulty at times, do you understand this??!?! End of discussion with you. I said everything I wanted, you seem too biased and ignorant about this subject. Ive given you several points to look into. If you refuse thats it. You have a long track record of being ignorant and stupid.

Washoe gonna washoe.

sorry bro, but with all the evidence Ive given you, you should be screaming retrial, as it is clear as daylight this was not a fair trial. way too many inconsistencies and lies. I cant take that much ignorance and unfairness.

You have not given me any evidence, my standard of evidence is more than loltubes.

oh yeah I haven't! sure! and Michelle Malkin is not a credible source, because she is republican and not only that, she is Asian, right?

Yeah that blows me away the Lefties will believe anything that Rachel or some like her say even if its been proven total PS and than ignore a guy like Mike Wallace or Brett Baier as they work for fox

Some of the most credible news worthy folks are on You Tube

Pretty amusing (or sad, I'm not entirely sure) seeing someone go HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARD in the paint for a convicted multiple-rapist.

the women in the hospital admitted she was lying as did several others. they had to throw half of the women out of court for making up bs. (thinking they hit the jackpot)

what if he didn't do it? then you are terribly wrong.

fair trial looks different and you should care about this imo.

what's funny is that his "standard" only includes people from the left, aka CNN, thus he doesn't even know what the other side is saying. living in a bubble is kinda sad imo.

you can follow and listen to anyone you like on youtube. but that's for thinking players imo. people like oak don't mind getting lied to over and over and served digestible bites on CNN only. never get the whole picture and parroting idols. cancel culture in perfection done by this one. fits perfectly it, although he vehemently denies it, lol.

I have watched less than five minutes of CNN my entire life.

Also as I stated before its not that you use loltubes as a source, its how you use it.

You take loltubes as gospel. The first loltubes you watch on a subject, that is now your opinion on that subject.

Nothing could be more ironic than you claiming you use loltubes to escape the echo chamber, loltubes is your echo chamber.

Each loltube is an echochamber, its one person giving a lecture and cherry picking evidence to support that lecture and strawmaning/misrepresenting counter arguments

Numerous posters have pointed this out to you.

Numerous times you have charged in a discussion and the result has been this:

Washoe: Watch this loltube.
Washoe: Watch this loltube.
Washoe: Watch this loltube.
Washoe: Watch this loltube.
Washoe: Watch this loltube.
Washoe: Watch this loltube.
Washoe: Sorry I was completely wrong, mods can you delete my posts.

You dont learn by your mistakes though.

Also as we have discussed before.

CNN is centre right, its a corporation that believes in neo liberal economics.

Those aren't the reasons I regard Malkin as an unreliable source. When it comes to Holtzclaw she engages in pr, not accuracy.
And as I stated before Ann Coulter is a GOP supporter and I agree with her opinion re a murder case. Doesn't mean I support her, just that I'm familiar with the case she opines on and agree with her position. Criminal cases, particularly involving murder and sexual assault transcend politics and need to be evaluated on their merits. Malkin consciously engages in innocence fraud. She's therefore worthless as a source.

I wasn't in particular referring to you. I was making a more generalization .