Quote:
For those keeping score at home:
Not Racist -
1. Not selling/renting homes to black folk because they're black.
If it's "because they're black" it's certainly racist.
If it's "because the local black demographic in 1973 had far higher rates of property damage and rent arrears", then it becomes a viable business decision - albeit a callous one - and the claims of racism get murkier.
Would Trump have rented to black people more than whites, or even excluded whites, if the statistics were reversed? Almost certainly I would think. He's a callous bottom line businessman, not a racist.
Quote:
Racist -
1. Having an organization that supports minority Latino lawyers when A Wild Toothsayer appears during their travels in this wacky racist world.
So when white people become 49.9% of the US, they can start organizations called "The White Race" that only helps white people, and it's not racist, but at 50.1% it is?
Latinos are the largest ethnic group in Calfornia by the way, surpassing whites. Are they now racist in your view? I'm probing the absurdity of your logic with these questions.