Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ex-President Trump ex-President Trump

05-08-2024 , 07:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
Btw I also think Cannon should have recused herself, or be recused by the appeal court
Why? Did she miss the "how to be impartial" judge trainings?
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Why? Did she miss the "how to be impartial" judge trainings?
literally never been a judge before Trump nominated her, so yes she missed judge training lol

(i am bigly against anyone ever being a prosecutor becoming a judge and viceversa, we need checks and balances and a complete separation of accusatorial power, which is executive power, and judicial power)
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 12:40 PM
If you're innocent go for the bench trial, if you're guilty go for the jury. imo

Last edited by davmcg; 05-08-2024 at 12:48 PM. Reason: obv 10% bluffing range for both to stop being exploited
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
literally never been a judge before Trump nominated her, so yes she missed judge training lol

(i am bigly against anyone ever being a prosecutor becoming a judge and viceversa, we need checks and balances and a complete separation of accusatorial power, which is executive power, and judicial power)
The one that baffled me is no access to the witness list from the prosecution till 24 hours before and than the Stormy Daniels testimony most which seemed irrelevant.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
The one that baffled me is no access to the witness list from the prosecution till 24 hours before and than the Stormy Daniels testimony most which seemed irrelevant.
We were discussing the judge overseeing proceedings for the mar-a-lago documents case which is as biased pro trump if not more, as the judge was against trump in the NYS civil fraud case
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
The one that baffled me is no access to the witness list from the prosecution till 24 hours before and than the Stormy Daniels testimony most which seemed irrelevant.
This is not quite correct. The defense has had a potential witness list for a long time. What they don't have is notice who the prosecution plans to call on what day. The prosecution is not required to provide this. Any notification is just a courtesy.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 01:32 PM


Text I got from my brother a couple hours ago about an interaction my 73 year old middle eastern mom had at a Costco

Assuming we’re the bad people for just assuming this person was a right wing nut. Sorry blah blah Mike
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 01:35 PM
have you considered not being middle eastern though?
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 01:43 PM
It’s true. That’s definitely my bad
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
The one that baffled me is no access to the witness list from the prosecution till 24 hours before and than the Stormy Daniels testimony most which seemed irrelevant.
Without even looking, I can assure you that witness lists were exchanged. I don't know whether the prosecution was required to specify the order in which they planned to call witnesses. Maybe not.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
literally never been a judge before Trump nominated her, so yes she missed judge training lol
Most judges who are appointed to the bench in federal district court were not judges before being nominated. Moving from the state court bench to the federal bench isn't much of a thing in the U.S.

And afaik, all new federal judges go to judge school.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen
It’s true. That’s definitely my bad
That women who accosted your mom sounds psychotic. It's one thing to road rage, but it's another thing to road rage and then say to yourself, "that old lady has a nice jacket. I'm going to take it."

Very weird.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
Most judges who are appointed to the bench in federal district court were not judges before being nominated. Moving from the state court bench to the federal bench isn't much of a thing in the U.S.

And afaik, all new federal judges go to judge school.
I think COVID screwed up with that a lot
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
I think COVID screwed up with that a lot
I don't know for certain, but I highly doubt you are correct. I assume that it just went remote like everything else.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I don't know for certain, but I highly doubt you are correct. I assume that it just went remote like everything else.
which as you know means basically not doing it
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
which as you know means basically not doing it
How would he, or anyone else, know that is true?

But since you apparently have insight into this, perhaps you can share your in-depth knowledge of the remote training they went through, and why it meant "basically not doing it"?
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
How would he, or anyone else, know that is true?

But since you apparently have insight into this, perhaps you can share your in-depth knowledge of the remote training they went through, and why it meant "basically not doing it"?
the disaster of remote education caused by covid mismanagement has been documented extensively, and here we are in an even worse situation, one of courses you can actually disregard anyway if you don't care too much, just try to imagine someone who couldn't care less to attend in person if he had to, having to log in remotely to pretend she is listening, what she can learn.

but nvmnd
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
the disaster of remote education caused by covid mismanagement has been documented extensively, and here we are in an even worse situation, one of courses you can actually disregard anyway if you don't care too much, just try to imagine someone who couldn't care less to attend in person if he had to, having to log in remotely to pretend she is listening, what she can learn.

but nvmnd
Judges aren’t kids .
Want to be judges already have a pretty good grasp of what law is.
You know autodidact is a real phenomenon….

Ps: AI with virtual reality is probably the future of education at home .
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montrealcorp
Judges aren’t kids .
Want to be judges already have a pretty good grasp of what law is.
You know autodidact is a real phenomenon….

Ps: AI with virtual reality is probably the future of education at home .
they don't need to pass an exam to become federal judges
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
they don't need to pass an exam to become federal judges
So what’s the problem then ?
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 06:53 PM
One of the departments under my wife is employee development. Remote education works just fine with motivated adults.
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didace
One of the departments under my wife is employee development. Remote education works just fine with motivated adults.
sure, which isn't the ase discussed
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 07:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
sure, which isn't the ase discussed
Is there nothing you won't make up in order to pretend to be right? You're really saying that people appointed to be judges aren't motivated to learn how to judge properly?
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 07:16 PM
+1
ex-President Trump Quote
05-08-2024 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
Is there nothing you won't make up in order to pretend to be right? You're really saying that people appointed to be judges aren't motivated to learn how to judge properly?
I am saying Cannon clearly didn't give a ****, do you disagree? weren't we talking about her and her alone? did you read the long list of technical criticisms moved toward her multiple erroneous technical choices since she had her hands over the documents trial? and that's before we move toward the naked partisanship of judgement calls
ex-President Trump Quote

      
m