Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
If Garland clearly feels there may be a conflict of interest would he have not also had a special counsel for Hunter as that is a conflict either? ( sorry Cuepee)
Bottom line weather its Garland or anyone else Trumps team is going to have the same narrative. Garland failed when he didnt investigate and charge Trump months ago and now he is taking the easy road.
Everyone knew Trump was running so that is a flimsy excuse as well
The sorry is appropriate as the right wing talking points have taught you all accusations are equal and need to be treated equally.
Just because right wing nuts scream Benghazi, Hunter Biden and soon, 'investigate Fauci' and 'Impeach Mayorkas' does not mean these things deserve serous consideration, Investigative committees and Special Counsels.
There was REAL and CLEAR evidence of Trump illegality, and not just spurious accusations of such, which upon initial considerations by law enforcement doing preliminary investigations 'RISE TO THE LEVEL' of PROCEEDING to a real full fledged investigation. It is then and only THEN, that a AG or DOJ would consider whether a Special Counsel should be considered.
Honest question. Do you understand the distinction I am pointing at?
I ask that as the entire reason Trump and his right cohort want to do all these Investigations and Impeachments, etc, is they believe it will make the Derps believe 'it is all the same'. "Trump was impeached... Biden was impeached...', 'Trump was investigated... Biden was investigated...'
THey believe they can snow all the Derps to just looking at this as things partisans do as opposed to what it really was which was the Dems being forced time and again, into very sombre and regretful actions by Trump that required investigation and impeachment.