Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
Stop making crap up. Were does it say I would refuse to use their pronouns. If I met someone who I interacted with and they pointed out I am using the wrong pro noun I would ask them can I refer to you by your name or what pro noun they want . What I am against is a law mandating it by the government.
This is sort of like saying you acknowledge racism, but are against affirmative action
Just the concept, not saying I have a particular stance on either matter
But the question really becomes, "How do we address this?"
Sometimes in the ideal world, being against government intervention is the right thing to do, but in the real world, it turns out intervention is the better option
I'm not saying I have an opinion on this matter, I'm saying that there should be some consideration on the possibility that your idealism is suboptimal in practice. It is arguable forced recognition is a good thing, especially if it leads to less violence and segments of the population feeling like they exist and can function like human beings since the government itself is directly acknowledging them
Might even be good for the economy. After all, it's been shown how much damage, economically, racism has caused...Worth thinking about
Last edited by TeflonDawg; 05-20-2021 at 01:44 PM.
Reason: Reworded the ideal world/intervention line